Altered placental phenotype and increased risk of placental pathology in fetal spina bifida: A matched case-control study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Marina White, David Grynspan, Jayden Arif-Pardy, Tim Van Mieghem, Kristin L Connor
{"title":"Altered placental phenotype and increased risk of placental pathology in fetal spina bifida: A matched case-control study.","authors":"Marina White, David Grynspan, Jayden Arif-Pardy, Tim Van Mieghem, Kristin L Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.placenta.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spina bifida (SB) remains one of the most common congenital anomalies and associates with significant comorbidities in the fetus, which may, in part, be driven by placental maldevelopment. We hypothesised that placental pathologies would be more prevalent in fetuses with SB compared to fetuses without congenital anomalies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Placental pathology and transcriptome were evaluated for fetuses with isolated open SB born preterm (cases; n = 12) and control fetuses without congenital anomalies (n = 22) born at full term (FT) or preterm (PT). We evaluated associations between study group and placental histopathology, and between placental histopathology and gene expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Placental weight was lower in cases than PT controls (median [IQR]: 263 g [175, 370] vs. 455 g [378, 560], p = 0.001). Placental villi structural phenotype was different in cases, where proportion of immature intermediate villi was higher in cases than PT controls (32.5 % [6.3, 56.3] vs. 10 % [5, 13.8], p = 0.01), but cases and FT controls had similar proportions of mature intermediate (10 % [5, 10] vs. 10 % [8.75, 11.25]) and terminal villi (22.5 % [11.3, 43.8] vs. 30 % [20, 36.3]), and similar odds of having many syncytial knots (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6 [0.2, 369]). Case placentae also had higher odds of having many Hofbauer cells (aOR = 16.2 [1.4, 580], p = 0.02) and a thick syncytial membrane (aOR = 146 [3, 3.46e5], p = 0.007). Gene expression in immune/inflammatory processes, spinal cord injury, and Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways were associated with placental maturity in cases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Improved knowledge on placental phenotypes in SB increases our understanding of mechanisms that may drive comorbidities, and may ultimately inform efforts to reduce offspring morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20203,"journal":{"name":"Placenta","volume":"159 ","pages":"107-118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Placenta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2024.12.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spina bifida (SB) remains one of the most common congenital anomalies and associates with significant comorbidities in the fetus, which may, in part, be driven by placental maldevelopment. We hypothesised that placental pathologies would be more prevalent in fetuses with SB compared to fetuses without congenital anomalies.

Methods: Placental pathology and transcriptome were evaluated for fetuses with isolated open SB born preterm (cases; n = 12) and control fetuses without congenital anomalies (n = 22) born at full term (FT) or preterm (PT). We evaluated associations between study group and placental histopathology, and between placental histopathology and gene expression.

Results: Placental weight was lower in cases than PT controls (median [IQR]: 263 g [175, 370] vs. 455 g [378, 560], p = 0.001). Placental villi structural phenotype was different in cases, where proportion of immature intermediate villi was higher in cases than PT controls (32.5 % [6.3, 56.3] vs. 10 % [5, 13.8], p = 0.01), but cases and FT controls had similar proportions of mature intermediate (10 % [5, 10] vs. 10 % [8.75, 11.25]) and terminal villi (22.5 % [11.3, 43.8] vs. 30 % [20, 36.3]), and similar odds of having many syncytial knots (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6 [0.2, 369]). Case placentae also had higher odds of having many Hofbauer cells (aOR = 16.2 [1.4, 580], p = 0.02) and a thick syncytial membrane (aOR = 146 [3, 3.46e5], p = 0.007). Gene expression in immune/inflammatory processes, spinal cord injury, and Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways were associated with placental maturity in cases.

Discussion: Improved knowledge on placental phenotypes in SB increases our understanding of mechanisms that may drive comorbidities, and may ultimately inform efforts to reduce offspring morbidity and mortality.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Placenta
Placenta 医学-发育生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Placenta publishes high-quality original articles and invited topical reviews on all aspects of human and animal placentation, and the interactions between the mother, the placenta and fetal development. Topics covered include evolution, development, genetics and epigenetics, stem cells, metabolism, transport, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, cell and molecular biology, and developmental programming. The Editors welcome studies on implantation and the endometrium, comparative placentation, the uterine and umbilical circulations, the relationship between fetal and placental development, clinical aspects of altered placental development or function, the placental membranes, the influence of paternal factors on placental development or function, and the assessment of biomarkers of placental disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信