The Nature of Shared Traumatic Experiences: When, How, and How Often Do We Share Trauma With Others?

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nadine P Hutchison, Emma F Thomas, Melanie K T Takarangi
{"title":"The Nature of Shared Traumatic Experiences: When, How, and How Often Do We Share Trauma With Others?","authors":"Nadine P Hutchison, Emma F Thomas, Melanie K T Takarangi","doi":"10.1177/00332941241301357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Across two studies, we investigated when, how, and how often people share traumatic events (<i>N</i> = 1008). In Study 1, most participants (78.5%) perceived their most stressful/traumatic event as shared primarily due to knowing others were present during the event (physical sharing), knowing/believing others had experienced or could experience a similar event (relational sharing), discussing the event with others (verbal sharing), or having the same emotions about the event as others (emotional sharing). In Study 2, we assessed the frequency and characteristics of these forms of sharing along with attitudinal sharing (same attitudes/beliefs/opinions about the event) and perpetrator sharing (perpetrator involved in the event). Nearly all participants (98.6%-99.4%) shared their most stressful/traumatic event with others in some way. Our findings demonstrate that people <i>commonly</i> share a <i>range of</i> traumatic events in various <i>unique</i> ways. This framework can inform and guide research addressing the impacts of these diverging forms of sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941241301357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241301357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across two studies, we investigated when, how, and how often people share traumatic events (N = 1008). In Study 1, most participants (78.5%) perceived their most stressful/traumatic event as shared primarily due to knowing others were present during the event (physical sharing), knowing/believing others had experienced or could experience a similar event (relational sharing), discussing the event with others (verbal sharing), or having the same emotions about the event as others (emotional sharing). In Study 2, we assessed the frequency and characteristics of these forms of sharing along with attitudinal sharing (same attitudes/beliefs/opinions about the event) and perpetrator sharing (perpetrator involved in the event). Nearly all participants (98.6%-99.4%) shared their most stressful/traumatic event with others in some way. Our findings demonstrate that people commonly share a range of traumatic events in various unique ways. This framework can inform and guide research addressing the impacts of these diverging forms of sharing.

分享创伤经历的本质:我们何时、如何以及多久与他人分享创伤?
在两项研究中,我们调查了人们分享创伤性事件的时间、方式和频率(N = 1008)。在研究1中,大多数参与者(78.5%)认为他们最紧张/创伤的事件是共享的,主要是因为知道其他人在事件发生时在场(身体分享),知道/相信其他人经历或可能经历类似的事件(关系分享),与他人讨论事件(言语分享),或者对事件有相同的情绪(情感分享)。在研究2中,我们评估了这些分享形式的频率和特征,以及态度分享(对事件的相同态度/信念/意见)和行为人分享(参与事件的行为人)。几乎所有的参与者(98.6%-99.4%)都以某种方式与他人分享了他们最紧张/创伤的事件。我们的研究结果表明,人们通常以各种独特的方式分享一系列创伤性事件。这个框架可以为解决这些不同的共享形式的影响的研究提供信息和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信