Mortality after concurrent treatment with gabapentin and opioids in older adults with spine diagnoses.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003448
Laura S Gold, Patrick J Heagerty, Ryan N Hansen, Janna L Friedly, Sandra K Johnston, Richard A Deyo, Michele Curatolo, Judith A Turner, Sean D Rundell, Katherine Wysham, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Pradeep Suri
{"title":"Mortality after concurrent treatment with gabapentin and opioids in older adults with spine diagnoses.","authors":"Laura S Gold, Patrick J Heagerty, Ryan N Hansen, Janna L Friedly, Sandra K Johnston, Richard A Deyo, Michele Curatolo, Judith A Turner, Sean D Rundell, Katherine Wysham, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Pradeep Suri","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Given the negative impact of opioid use on population health, prescriptions for alternative pain-relieving medications, including gabapentin, have increased. We wanted to determine whether people who filled gabapentin and opioid prescriptions concurrently (\"gabapentin + opioids\") had greater mortality than those who filled an active control medication (tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs] or duloxetine) and opioids concurrently (\"TCAs/duloxetine + opioids\"). In this population-based, propensity score-matched cohort study, we identified Medicare beneficiaries with spine-related diagnoses from 2017 to 2019. We compared people treated with gabapentin + opioids (n = 67,133) to people treated with TCAs/duloxetine + opioids (n = 67,133) who were matched on demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was mortality at any time, and a secondary outcome was occurrence of a major medical complication at any time. Among 134,266 participants (median age 73.4 years; 66.7% female), 2360 died before the end of follow-up. No difference in mortality was observed between groups (adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for gabapentin + opioids 0.98 [0.90-1.06]; P = 0.63). However, people treated with gabapentin + opioids were at slightly increased risk of a major medical complication (1.02 [1.00-1.04]; P = 0.03) compared to those treated with TCAs/duloxetine + opioids. Results were similar in analyses (1) restricted to ≤30-day follow-up and (2) that required ≥2 fills of each prescription. When treating pain in older adults taking opioids, the addition of gabapentin did not increase mortality risk relative to addition of TCAs or duloxetine.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"e51-e59"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Given the negative impact of opioid use on population health, prescriptions for alternative pain-relieving medications, including gabapentin, have increased. We wanted to determine whether people who filled gabapentin and opioid prescriptions concurrently ("gabapentin + opioids") had greater mortality than those who filled an active control medication (tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs] or duloxetine) and opioids concurrently ("TCAs/duloxetine + opioids"). In this population-based, propensity score-matched cohort study, we identified Medicare beneficiaries with spine-related diagnoses from 2017 to 2019. We compared people treated with gabapentin + opioids (n = 67,133) to people treated with TCAs/duloxetine + opioids (n = 67,133) who were matched on demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was mortality at any time, and a secondary outcome was occurrence of a major medical complication at any time. Among 134,266 participants (median age 73.4 years; 66.7% female), 2360 died before the end of follow-up. No difference in mortality was observed between groups (adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for gabapentin + opioids 0.98 [0.90-1.06]; P = 0.63). However, people treated with gabapentin + opioids were at slightly increased risk of a major medical complication (1.02 [1.00-1.04]; P = 0.03) compared to those treated with TCAs/duloxetine + opioids. Results were similar in analyses (1) restricted to ≤30-day follow-up and (2) that required ≥2 fills of each prescription. When treating pain in older adults taking opioids, the addition of gabapentin did not increase mortality risk relative to addition of TCAs or duloxetine.

患有脊柱疾病的老年人同时接受加巴喷丁和阿片类药物治疗后的死亡率。
摘要:鉴于阿片类药物使用对人群健康的负面影响,包括加巴喷丁在内的替代止痛药的处方有所增加。我们想确定同时服用加巴喷丁和阿片类药物(“加巴喷丁+阿片类药物”)的患者是否比同时服用积极对照药物(三环抗抑郁药[TCAs]或度洛西汀)和阿片类药物(“TCAs/度洛西汀+阿片类药物”)的患者死亡率更高。在这项基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究中,我们确定了2017年至2019年脊柱相关诊断的医疗保险受益人。我们比较了加巴喷丁+阿片类药物治疗的患者(n = 67133)和TCAs/度洛西汀+阿片类药物治疗的患者(n = 67133),他们在人口统计学和临床因素上是匹配的。主要结局是任何时候的死亡率,次要结局是任何时候发生的主要医疗并发症。134,266名参与者(中位年龄73.4岁;66.7%女性),随访结束前死亡2360例。两组间死亡率无差异(加巴喷丁+阿片类药物的校正风险比和95%置信区间为0.98 [0.90-1.06];P = 0.63)。然而,加巴喷丁+阿片类药物治疗的患者发生主要医学并发症的风险略有增加(1.02 [1.00-1.04];P = 0.03),与TCAs/度洛西汀+阿片类药物治疗组相比。分析结果相似:(1)限于≤30天的随访,(2)每个处方需要≥2次填充。在治疗服用阿片类药物的老年人疼痛时,加巴喷丁的添加并不会增加TCAs或度洛西汀的死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信