De-Escalating Surgery in Merkel Cell Carcinoma With Clinical Nodal Disease.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Neha Shafique, Emily Ertmann, Gabriella N Tortorello, Cimarron E Sharon, Giorgos C Karakousis, John T Miura
{"title":"De-Escalating Surgery in Merkel Cell Carcinoma With Clinical Nodal Disease.","authors":"Neha Shafique, Emily Ertmann, Gabriella N Tortorello, Cimarron E Sharon, Giorgos C Karakousis, John T Miura","doi":"10.1002/jso.28037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a radiosensitive aggressive skin cancer that spreads via the lymphatics. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal management of the nodal basin for patients with MCC with clinically positive nodes. We study the efficacy of single node excision (SNE) as an alternative to a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) in patients with limited nodal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with MCC with clinical nodal disease who underwent resection in the form of either SNE or TLND using the National Cancer Database. The association between type of surgery and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1835 patients met all inclusion criteria with 281 patients undergoing SNE and the remainder undergoing TLND. Patients receiving SNE and TLND were equally likely to receive radiation to the nodal basin (SNE 44.5% vs. TLND 48.5%, p = 0.22). There was no difference in 5-year OS between patients who received SNE versus TLND (SNE 43.9% vs. TLND 44.7%, p = 0.36). This persisted in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model in which receipt of SNE remained not significantly associated with survival after adjusting for clinical and treatment factors including receipt of radiation (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42, p = 0.11). In patients undergoing SNE with radiation, 5-year OS was 54.4% (95% CI 44.1-63.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TLND is not associated with a survival advantage over SNE. Further prospective study into patterns of recurrence and safety of SNE is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a radiosensitive aggressive skin cancer that spreads via the lymphatics. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal management of the nodal basin for patients with MCC with clinically positive nodes. We study the efficacy of single node excision (SNE) as an alternative to a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) in patients with limited nodal disease.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with MCC with clinical nodal disease who underwent resection in the form of either SNE or TLND using the National Cancer Database. The association between type of surgery and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: 1835 patients met all inclusion criteria with 281 patients undergoing SNE and the remainder undergoing TLND. Patients receiving SNE and TLND were equally likely to receive radiation to the nodal basin (SNE 44.5% vs. TLND 48.5%, p = 0.22). There was no difference in 5-year OS between patients who received SNE versus TLND (SNE 43.9% vs. TLND 44.7%, p = 0.36). This persisted in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model in which receipt of SNE remained not significantly associated with survival after adjusting for clinical and treatment factors including receipt of radiation (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42, p = 0.11). In patients undergoing SNE with radiation, 5-year OS was 54.4% (95% CI 44.1-63.6).

Conclusions: TLND is not associated with a survival advantage over SNE. Further prospective study into patterns of recurrence and safety of SNE is needed.

对有临床结节病的梅克尔细胞癌进行去鳞手术
背景:梅克尔细胞癌(MCC)是一种对放射线敏感的侵袭性皮肤癌,可通过淋巴管扩散。对于临床结节阳性的梅克尔细胞癌患者,结节盆地的最佳治疗方法尚不确定。我们研究了单结节切除术(SNE)作为治疗性淋巴结清扫术(TLND)的替代方案,对结节病变有限的患者的疗效:我们利用全国癌症数据库对临床上有结节病、接受了单结节切除术或治疗性淋巴结清扫术的 MCC 患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Cox 比例危险模型估算了手术类型与总生存期(OS)之间的关系:1835名患者符合所有纳入标准,其中281名患者接受了SNE手术,其余患者接受了TLND手术。接受SNE和TLND的患者接受结节盆地放射治疗的可能性相同(SNE 44.5% vs. TLND 48.5%, p = 0.22)。接受SNE和TLND的患者在5年生存率上没有差异(SNE 43.9% vs. TLND 44.7%,p = 0.36)。这种情况在多变量考克斯比例危险模型中依然存在,在调整了包括接受放射治疗在内的临床和治疗因素后,接受SNE与生存率仍无明显关系(危险比[HR] 1.17,95% CI 0.96-1.42,p = 0.11)。在接受放射治疗的 SNE 患者中,5 年 OS 为 54.4% (95% CI 44.1-63.6):结论:TLND与SNE相比不具有生存优势。需要对 SNE 的复发模式和安全性进行进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信