Wishful perceiving: A value-based bias for perception of close others.

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Shir Ginosar Yaari, Dana Katsoty, Anat Bardi, Daniela Barni, Ewa Skimina, Jan Cieciuch, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Markku J Verkasalo, Ariel Knafo-Noam
{"title":"Wishful perceiving: A value-based bias for perception of close others.","authors":"Shir Ginosar Yaari, Dana Katsoty, Anat Bardi, Daniela Barni, Ewa Skimina, Jan Cieciuch, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Markku J Verkasalo, Ariel Knafo-Noam","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Why do people not perceive their close others accurately, although they have ample information about them? We propose that one reason for such errors may be bias based on personal values. Personal values may serve as schemas defining what people see as positive, and thus affect perceptions of others' behavior, values, and traits. We propose that, in close relationships, people see others as sharing their own values. Six studies (<i>N</i> = 2,225; four preregistered analyses and one preregistered study) tested this bias. Perceivers reported their personal values and the perceived values, behaviors, or traits of a close other (target), while the target also reported on the same values, behaviors, or traits. Personal values significantly and positively related to perception of close others' values and behaviors, while controlling for the real targets' value/behavior. Results were replicated for spouses, romantic partners, children, parents, and friends. Some evidence also supports the idea that the bias is stronger for relationships of better quality. Implications for relationship quality are discussed, as well as implications for the adaptive properties of this bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do people not perceive their close others accurately, although they have ample information about them? We propose that one reason for such errors may be bias based on personal values. Personal values may serve as schemas defining what people see as positive, and thus affect perceptions of others' behavior, values, and traits. We propose that, in close relationships, people see others as sharing their own values. Six studies (N = 2,225; four preregistered analyses and one preregistered study) tested this bias. Perceivers reported their personal values and the perceived values, behaviors, or traits of a close other (target), while the target also reported on the same values, behaviors, or traits. Personal values significantly and positively related to perception of close others' values and behaviors, while controlling for the real targets' value/behavior. Results were replicated for spouses, romantic partners, children, parents, and friends. Some evidence also supports the idea that the bias is stronger for relationships of better quality. Implications for relationship quality are discussed, as well as implications for the adaptive properties of this bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

一厢情愿的感知:基于价值的对亲密他人的认知偏差。
为什么人们虽然掌握了关于亲密他人的大量信息,却不能准确地感知他们呢?我们认为,造成这种错误的原因之一可能是基于个人价值观的偏见。个人价值观可以作为一种图式,定义人们认为积极的事物,从而影响对他人行为、价值观和特质的感知。我们认为,在亲密关系中,人们会将他人视为分享自己的价值观。六项研究(N = 2,225; 四项预先登记的分析和一项预先登记的研究)对这一偏差进行了测试。感知者报告了他们的个人价值观和亲密他人(目标)的感知价值观、行为或特征,而目标也报告了相同的价值观、行为或特征。在控制真实目标的价值观/行为的情况下,个人价值观与对亲密他人价值观和行为的感知有明显的正相关。结果在配偶、恋爱伴侣、子女、父母和朋友身上得到了验证。一些证据还支持这样一种观点,即对于质量较高的关系,偏差会更大。本文讨论了这种偏差对人际关系质量的影响,以及对其适应性的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信