Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S485781
Ying Liang, Jianlei Xia, Wenting Huo, Bangjie Liu, Zhangyu Wang, Yanbing Ding, Keyan Wu
{"title":"Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ying Liang, Jianlei Xia, Wenting Huo, Bangjie Liu, Zhangyu Wang, Yanbing Ding, Keyan Wu","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S485781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term \"GERD.\" Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"5927-5939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S485781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.

Background: Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.

Design: A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.

Methods: In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.

Results: A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.

Conclusion: This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.

Relevance to clinical practice: By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.

TikTok 和 Bilibili 上有关胃食管反流病的视频质量评估和分析:横断面研究。
目的和目标评估 TikTok 和 Bilibili.Background 上胃食管反流病(GERD)视频的内容质量和可靠性:背景:由于许多胃食管反流病患者使用当前的网络平台搜索健康信息,因此有必要评估社交媒体上胃食管反流病视频的质量。TikTok和Bilibili上有许多胃食管反流病视频,但这些视频中的信息质量仍不得而知:设计:在两个视频平台上进行横向调查:2023 年 11 月,我们以 "胃食管反流病 "为搜索关键词,在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上检索了 200 个视频。我们提取了视频的基本信息,对内容进行了编码,并确定了视频来源。两名独立评分员使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准标准、修改后的 DISCERN(mDISCERN)标准和全球质量评分(GQS)工具对每个视频的质量进行评估:结果:共收集到 156 个视频。TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的大多数视频都来自消化科医生。TikTok 的胃食管反流视频质量和可靠性均高于 Bilibili。两个平台的 mDISCERN 和 GQS 分数与持续时间呈正相关,GQS 分数与收藏和分享呈正相关。Bilibili 的 JAMA 分数与时间同步评论呈负相关,而 TikTok 的 JAMA 分数与上传天数呈负相关:本研究表明,作为胃食管反流病科学信息的来源,TikTok 和 Bilibili 的内容质量得分一般,患者应谨慎识别和选择观看 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上与胃食管反流病相关的视频:通过对两个平台上有关胃食管反流病的视频质量进行评估,可为临床健康教育干预提供新思路,并为提高视频质量水平提供相关依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信