Heart Transplant Centers With and Without Liver Transplant Programs: Analysis of Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Metrics.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Faizaan Siddique, Sanath Patil, Keshava Rajagopal, John W Entwistle, Rohinton J Morris, Adam Bodzin, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
{"title":"Heart Transplant Centers With and Without Liver Transplant Programs: Analysis of Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Metrics.","authors":"Faizaan Siddique, Sanath Patil, Keshava Rajagopal, John W Entwistle, Rohinton J Morris, Adam Bodzin, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We studied the relationship between heart transplant centers with and without liver transplant programs regarding volume, waitlist duration, waitlist survival, and 1-y posttransplant survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were acquired in July 2023 and represented transplant centers with adult organ transplant volumes in the United States over the past year. This system involved a five-tier ranking system from one to five, where tier one programs had the lowest rating and tier five programs had the highest rating.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among heart transplant centers, there were 37 (29.6%) heart-only centers and 88 (70.4%) heart-liver centers. Median heart transplant volume was greater in heart-liver centers (28 [interquartile range: 18-47]) relative to heart-only centers (10 [2-20]; P < 0.001). Median heart waitlist duration rating was higher among heart-liver centers (3 [2-4] versus 2 [2-3]; P = 0.05). A higher waitlist duration rating was associated with greater annual transplant volume (P < 0.001). Waitlist survival rating distributions were similar across heart-only and heart-liver centers (3 [2-4] versus 4 [2-4]; P = 0.33). No significant association was observed between heart transplant volume and waitlist survival rating (P = 0.52). Median posttransplant survival rating between the two transplant center types was also comparable (3 [2-4] versus 3 [2-4]; P = 0.43). A higher posttransplant survival rating was associated with higher transplant volume (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heart transplant centers with concomitant liver transplant programs have a superior waitlist duration rating as well as higher overall transplant volumes when compared with heart-only transplant centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"305 ","pages":"131-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We studied the relationship between heart transplant centers with and without liver transplant programs regarding volume, waitlist duration, waitlist survival, and 1-y posttransplant survival.

Methods: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were acquired in July 2023 and represented transplant centers with adult organ transplant volumes in the United States over the past year. This system involved a five-tier ranking system from one to five, where tier one programs had the lowest rating and tier five programs had the highest rating.

Results: Among heart transplant centers, there were 37 (29.6%) heart-only centers and 88 (70.4%) heart-liver centers. Median heart transplant volume was greater in heart-liver centers (28 [interquartile range: 18-47]) relative to heart-only centers (10 [2-20]; P < 0.001). Median heart waitlist duration rating was higher among heart-liver centers (3 [2-4] versus 2 [2-3]; P = 0.05). A higher waitlist duration rating was associated with greater annual transplant volume (P < 0.001). Waitlist survival rating distributions were similar across heart-only and heart-liver centers (3 [2-4] versus 4 [2-4]; P = 0.33). No significant association was observed between heart transplant volume and waitlist survival rating (P = 0.52). Median posttransplant survival rating between the two transplant center types was also comparable (3 [2-4] versus 3 [2-4]; P = 0.43). A higher posttransplant survival rating was associated with higher transplant volume (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Heart transplant centers with concomitant liver transplant programs have a superior waitlist duration rating as well as higher overall transplant volumes when compared with heart-only transplant centers.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信