Effect and impression of structured feedback in formative assessment of medical undergraduates of Eastern India.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1923_23
Sanghamitra Chakraborty, Sunita Vagha, Sebanti Chakrabarty
{"title":"Effect and impression of structured feedback in formative assessment of medical undergraduates of Eastern India.","authors":"Sanghamitra Chakraborty, Sunita Vagha, Sebanti Chakrabarty","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1923_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feedback, the integral component of formative assessment, should be timely, specific, and methodical. Feedback is a stop-gap that helps the learner to assess their performance and reinforce their desire to learn. This study was conducted to explore the effectiveness of feedback in improving the performance of medical undergraduates in formative assessment and assessment of perceptions of students about feedback. This comparative interventional study was conducted to monitor the improvement in formative assessment scores after the structured feedback. Medical undergraduates of phase1 (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) Batch 2022-2023) of Bankura Sammilani Medical College and Hospital were included as the study participants. The proportion of students having scores <50% and >50% between the two formative assessments were compared using the Chi-square test. A questionnaire in the Likert scale was devised to assess the perception of students regarding quality of feedback and analyzed by Tastle and Wierman formula. The number of students scoring > 50% as well as their mean formative assessment scores increased significantly after feedback (<i>P</i> = 0.0009). The majority of the students proclaimed that feedback was non-judgmental and motivated for the study. Feedback motivated students to assess their deficits and encouraged the desire to study to overcome the lacunae. The majority of the students (65.9%) strongly voiced that the feedback was effective, valuable, and non-judgmental.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1923_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feedback, the integral component of formative assessment, should be timely, specific, and methodical. Feedback is a stop-gap that helps the learner to assess their performance and reinforce their desire to learn. This study was conducted to explore the effectiveness of feedback in improving the performance of medical undergraduates in formative assessment and assessment of perceptions of students about feedback. This comparative interventional study was conducted to monitor the improvement in formative assessment scores after the structured feedback. Medical undergraduates of phase1 (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) Batch 2022-2023) of Bankura Sammilani Medical College and Hospital were included as the study participants. The proportion of students having scores <50% and >50% between the two formative assessments were compared using the Chi-square test. A questionnaire in the Likert scale was devised to assess the perception of students regarding quality of feedback and analyzed by Tastle and Wierman formula. The number of students scoring > 50% as well as their mean formative assessment scores increased significantly after feedback (P = 0.0009). The majority of the students proclaimed that feedback was non-judgmental and motivated for the study. Feedback motivated students to assess their deficits and encouraged the desire to study to overcome the lacunae. The majority of the students (65.9%) strongly voiced that the feedback was effective, valuable, and non-judgmental.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信