Comparing the effect of haptonomy and CBT-based counseling on childbirth experience and postpartum depression of women with high fear of childbirth: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1075_23
Zahra Alivand, Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh, Sevil Hakimi, Khalil Esmaeilpour, Esmat Mehrabi
{"title":"Comparing the effect of haptonomy and CBT-based counseling on childbirth experience and postpartum depression of women with high fear of childbirth: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Zahra Alivand, Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh, Sevil Hakimi, Khalil Esmaeilpour, Esmat Mehrabi","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1075_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of childbirth (FOC) leads to the perception of more pain and a negative childbirth experience. Negative childbirth experience is related to postpartum depression. This study aimed to compare the effect of haptonomy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on the childbirth experience and postpartum depression of women with high FOC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was performed on 99 primigravida women referred to health centers in Tabriz, Iran, from January to August 2022. Participants with Wijma score above 65 were assigned into three groups using block randomization. One of the intervention groups (<i>n</i> = 33) received eight sessions of CBT from gestational age of 24-28 weeks and the other group (<i>n</i> = 33) received haptonomy during five sessions once a week. The control group (<i>n</i> = 33) received routine care. The data were collected using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, and childbirth experiences questionnaire version 2.0 and were analyzed using ANOVA and ANCOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of childbirth experience in the CBT and haptonomy groups was 70.67 (13.70) and 70.63 (14.48), respectively, which was more than that in the control group 61.63 (14.11) (<i>P</i> = 0.01). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the intervention groups (<i>P</i> = 1.000). There wasn't significant difference in the mean score of postpartum depression among CBT 7.59 (3.03), haptonomy 7.47 (4.49), and control 9.71 (3.05) groups (<i>P</i> = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both CBT and haptonomy improved the childbirth experience, but did not affect postpartum depression. Considering the lack of significant difference between the CBT and haptonomy intervention groups in terms of childbirth experience and given that haptonomy intervention is employed by midwives with no need for CBT counseling skills and can be presented in fewer sessions than CBT, it can be used as a preferred intervention approach by midwives in the care of pregnant women with FOC to improve the childbirth experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1075_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fear of childbirth (FOC) leads to the perception of more pain and a negative childbirth experience. Negative childbirth experience is related to postpartum depression. This study aimed to compare the effect of haptonomy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on the childbirth experience and postpartum depression of women with high FOC.

Materials and methods: This randomized controlled trial was performed on 99 primigravida women referred to health centers in Tabriz, Iran, from January to August 2022. Participants with Wijma score above 65 were assigned into three groups using block randomization. One of the intervention groups (n = 33) received eight sessions of CBT from gestational age of 24-28 weeks and the other group (n = 33) received haptonomy during five sessions once a week. The control group (n = 33) received routine care. The data were collected using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, and childbirth experiences questionnaire version 2.0 and were analyzed using ANOVA and ANCOVA.

Results: The mean score of childbirth experience in the CBT and haptonomy groups was 70.67 (13.70) and 70.63 (14.48), respectively, which was more than that in the control group 61.63 (14.11) (P = 0.01). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the intervention groups (P = 1.000). There wasn't significant difference in the mean score of postpartum depression among CBT 7.59 (3.03), haptonomy 7.47 (4.49), and control 9.71 (3.05) groups (P = 0.09).

Conclusions: Both CBT and haptonomy improved the childbirth experience, but did not affect postpartum depression. Considering the lack of significant difference between the CBT and haptonomy intervention groups in terms of childbirth experience and given that haptonomy intervention is employed by midwives with no need for CBT counseling skills and can be presented in fewer sessions than CBT, it can be used as a preferred intervention approach by midwives in the care of pregnant women with FOC to improve the childbirth experience.

比较合欢疗法和基于 CBT 的心理咨询对分娩高度恐惧妇女的分娩体验和产后抑郁的影响:随机临床试验。
背景:分娩恐惧(FOC)导致更多的疼痛感和消极的分娩体验。消极的分娩经历与产后抑郁症有关。本研究旨在比较幸福疗法和认知行为疗法(CBT)对高FOC妇女分娩体验和产后抑郁的影响。材料和方法:这项随机对照试验于2022年1月至8月在伊朗大不里士的保健中心对99名初诊妇女进行。Wijma评分在65分以上的参与者采用分组随机法分为三组。其中一组(n = 33)从胎龄24-28周开始接受8次CBT治疗,另一组(n = 33)每周接受1次,共5次。对照组(n = 33)接受常规护理。数据采用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表和分娩经历问卷2.0版收集,并采用方差分析和方差分析。结果:CBT组分娩经验平均得分为70.67分(13.70分),快乐疗法组分娩经验平均得分为70.63分(14.48分),明显高于对照组61.63分(14.11分)(P = 0.01)。但干预组间差异无统计学意义(P = 1.000)。CBT组产后抑郁平均得分为7.59分(3.03分),快乐组为7.47分(4.49分),对照组为9.71分(3.05分),差异均无统计学意义(P = 0.09)。结论:CBT和快乐疗法均能改善分娩体验,但对产后抑郁无影响。考虑到CBT和快乐疗法干预组在分娩体验方面没有显著差异,并且快乐疗法干预由助产士使用,不需要CBT咨询技能,并且可以比CBT提供更少的疗程,因此它可以作为助产士护理FOC孕妇的首选干预方法,以改善分娩体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信