Hurdle Approach to Simulate Corn Wet Milling Inactivation of Undesirable Microorganisms: A Pilot Scale Microbial Challenge Study Using Salmonella Surrogate Enterococcus faecium.

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Erin Kealey, Madeline Shick, Minho Kim, Ruben Chavez, Gordon Shetley, David Stenger, Kirk A Perreau, Allison Cooke, Cecil Barnett-Neefs, Matthew J Stasiewicz
{"title":"Hurdle Approach to Simulate Corn Wet Milling Inactivation of Undesirable Microorganisms: A Pilot Scale Microbial Challenge Study Using Salmonella Surrogate Enterococcus faecium.","authors":"Erin Kealey, Madeline Shick, Minho Kim, Ruben Chavez, Gordon Shetley, David Stenger, Kirk A Perreau, Allison Cooke, Cecil Barnett-Neefs, Matthew J Stasiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Corn wet milling (CWM) and corn starch flash drying processing conditions reduce undesirable microorganisms, such as Salmonella.Finished products are historically safe, with intrinsic properties such as low water activity inhibiting microbial growth. Corn processors could use quantified levels of reduction in this study of Salmonella surrogate Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) to update their food safety plans. Industry-relevant conditions for CWM processes were recreated at pilot or lab scale for 3 unit operations: (1) steeping treatment in sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) with low (750 ppm SO<sub>2</sub>, 20 hours, 43.3°C), medium (1,500 ppm SO<sub>2</sub>, 30 hours, 48.9°C), and high (2,200 ppm SO<sub>2</sub>, 40 hours, 53.3°C) treatment conditions; (2) hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) treatment tested on bench scale with a factorial design (pH 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentrations (0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15% (w/w)), and temperatures (32, 38, and 46°C) for 3 and 6 hours; (3) flash drying treatment at 4 different temperatures (149, 177, 204, and 232°C) with 2 different inoculation methods. E. faecium was reduced during each of these unit operations. By the end of each steeping treatment E. faecium was consistently below the limit of quantitation (LOQ), meaning > 6.5 log CFU/mL reduction in steep water, and > 3.7 log CFU/g reduction in ground corn. The peroxide step had a reduction range from 0.03 log CFU/mL in the control group (0% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> added) to >6 log CFU/mL observed in the high-intensity treatment of corn starch slurry. Flash drying had a reduction range from 1.7 to 2.7 log CFU/g. There was also no biologically meaningful change (<1 log CFU/g reduction) of E. faecium counts during an 8-week survival study of the dried final product. This hurdle approach study shows that existing CWM conditions are effective for Salmonella surrogate reduction through processing into finished starch and provides quantified E. faecium reductions for use in of food safety plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corn wet milling (CWM) and corn starch flash drying processing conditions reduce undesirable microorganisms, such as Salmonella.Finished products are historically safe, with intrinsic properties such as low water activity inhibiting microbial growth. Corn processors could use quantified levels of reduction in this study of Salmonella surrogate Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) to update their food safety plans. Industry-relevant conditions for CWM processes were recreated at pilot or lab scale for 3 unit operations: (1) steeping treatment in sulfur dioxide (SO2) with low (750 ppm SO2, 20 hours, 43.3°C), medium (1,500 ppm SO2, 30 hours, 48.9°C), and high (2,200 ppm SO2, 40 hours, 53.3°C) treatment conditions; (2) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) treatment tested on bench scale with a factorial design (pH 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5), H2O2 concentrations (0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15% (w/w)), and temperatures (32, 38, and 46°C) for 3 and 6 hours; (3) flash drying treatment at 4 different temperatures (149, 177, 204, and 232°C) with 2 different inoculation methods. E. faecium was reduced during each of these unit operations. By the end of each steeping treatment E. faecium was consistently below the limit of quantitation (LOQ), meaning > 6.5 log CFU/mL reduction in steep water, and > 3.7 log CFU/g reduction in ground corn. The peroxide step had a reduction range from 0.03 log CFU/mL in the control group (0% H2O2 added) to >6 log CFU/mL observed in the high-intensity treatment of corn starch slurry. Flash drying had a reduction range from 1.7 to 2.7 log CFU/g. There was also no biologically meaningful change (<1 log CFU/g reduction) of E. faecium counts during an 8-week survival study of the dried final product. This hurdle approach study shows that existing CWM conditions are effective for Salmonella surrogate reduction through processing into finished starch and provides quantified E. faecium reductions for use in of food safety plans.

模拟玉米湿磨失活不良微生物的 "绊脚石 "方法:使用沙门氏菌替代粪肠球菌进行的试验规模微生物挑战研究。
玉米湿磨(CWM)和玉米淀粉闪蒸干燥加工条件可减少沙门氏菌等不良微生物。玉米加工商可以利用本研究中沙门氏菌替代物屎肠球菌(E. faecium)的量化减少水平来更新其食品安全计划。在中试或实验室规模上重新创建了 3 个单元操作中与工业相关的 CWM 过程条件:(1)在二氧化硫 (SO2) 中进行浸泡处理,处理条件分别为低(750 ppm SO2,20 小时,43.3°C)、中(1,500 ppm SO2,30 小时,48.9°C)和高(2,200 ppm SO2,40 小时,53.3°C)处理条件;(2)过氧化氢(H2O2)处理,采用因子设计(pH 值 3.5、4.0 和 4.5)、H2O2 浓度(0.05%、0.10%、0.15%(w/w))和温度(32、38 和 46°C),分别处理 3 和 6 小时;(3)在 4 种不同温度(149、177、204 和 232°C)和 2 种不同接种方法下进行闪蒸干燥处理。在每个单元操作过程中,粪肠球菌的数量都有所减少。在每次浸泡处理结束时,粪肠球菌的数量始终低于定量限 (LOQ),即在浸泡水中减少 > 6.5 log CFU/mL,在磨碎的玉米中减少 > 3.7 log CFU/g。过氧化物步骤的减少范围从对照组(添加 0% H2O2)的 0.03 log CFU/mL 到玉米淀粉浆高强度处理中观察到的 >6 log CFU/mL。闪蒸干燥的减少范围为 1.7 至 2.7 log CFU/g。也没有发生有生物意义的变化 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信