Comparing hoarseness and sore throat after extubation at different endotracheal cuff pressures: A double-blinded clinical trial.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_953_23
Azar Arabkhazaie, Zahra Sadeghi Noghabi, Mehrsa Basiri Moghadam, Mohsen Saheban Maleki, Hossein Aalami
{"title":"Comparing hoarseness and sore throat after extubation at different endotracheal cuff pressures: A double-blinded clinical trial.","authors":"Azar Arabkhazaie, Zahra Sadeghi Noghabi, Mehrsa Basiri Moghadam, Mohsen Saheban Maleki, Hossein Aalami","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_953_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sore throat and hoarseness are two common complications of intubation in patients with general anesthesia. This research aimed to compare the effect of different endotracheal cuff pressures on sore throat and hoarseness after general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present double-blinded clinical trial was conducted on 45 patients who are candidates for surgery with general anesthesia in autumn and winter 2021. The participants were divided into three groups of 15 through a permuted block randomization. The 20-24 cm H2O (level of pressure) group was labeled as A, and the 25-29 cm H2O group B and the 30-34 cm H2O group was known as group C. All the patients were operated. The endotracheal intubation was done for men with tubes #8-8.5 and for women with tubes 7-7.5. The presence and severity sore throat and the hoarseness after operation were checked by a nurse after recovery. Data were recorded in a researcher-made checklist. The data were analyzed in SPSS 19. <i>P</i> <0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the majority of participants suffered a slight hoarseness within the 1<sup>st</sup> hour (73.3%), 12<sup>th</sup> hour (91.1%), and 24<sup>th</sup> hour (100%) after recovery. Similarly, most participants experienced a slight hoarseness in the 1<sup>st</sup> hour (57.8%), 12<sup>th</sup> hour (71.1%), and 24<sup>th</sup> hour (91.1%) after recovery. Kruskal-Wallis test results showed no statistically significant correlation between hoarseness and the level of endotracheal cuff pressure in the three groups (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of the present study, despite the fact that the range of 20 to 34 cm of water is a safe and risk-free range in terms of causing sore throat and hoarseness, and there was no difference between the pressures in the three groups, but at higher pressure (groups 2 and 3), the amount of sore throat and hoarseness was more and there was a statistically significant difference at different times within group. Therefore, as much as possible, the amount of pressure should be adjusted according to the need and avoid applying excess pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_953_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sore throat and hoarseness are two common complications of intubation in patients with general anesthesia. This research aimed to compare the effect of different endotracheal cuff pressures on sore throat and hoarseness after general anesthesia.

Materials and methods: The present double-blinded clinical trial was conducted on 45 patients who are candidates for surgery with general anesthesia in autumn and winter 2021. The participants were divided into three groups of 15 through a permuted block randomization. The 20-24 cm H2O (level of pressure) group was labeled as A, and the 25-29 cm H2O group B and the 30-34 cm H2O group was known as group C. All the patients were operated. The endotracheal intubation was done for men with tubes #8-8.5 and for women with tubes 7-7.5. The presence and severity sore throat and the hoarseness after operation were checked by a nurse after recovery. Data were recorded in a researcher-made checklist. The data were analyzed in SPSS 19. P <0.05 was considered.

Results: The results revealed that the majority of participants suffered a slight hoarseness within the 1st hour (73.3%), 12th hour (91.1%), and 24th hour (100%) after recovery. Similarly, most participants experienced a slight hoarseness in the 1st hour (57.8%), 12th hour (71.1%), and 24th hour (91.1%) after recovery. Kruskal-Wallis test results showed no statistically significant correlation between hoarseness and the level of endotracheal cuff pressure in the three groups (P > .05).

Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, despite the fact that the range of 20 to 34 cm of water is a safe and risk-free range in terms of causing sore throat and hoarseness, and there was no difference between the pressures in the three groups, but at higher pressure (groups 2 and 3), the amount of sore throat and hoarseness was more and there was a statistically significant difference at different times within group. Therefore, as much as possible, the amount of pressure should be adjusted according to the need and avoid applying excess pressure.

不同气管插管袖带压力下拔管后声音嘶哑和咽喉疼痛的比较:双盲临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信