Efficacy and Safety of Cagrilintide Alone and in Combination with Semaglutide (Cagrisema) as Anti-Obesity Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, B G Harish, Meha Sharma, Ameya Joshi, Basavanagowdappa Hathur, Abm Kamrul-Hasan
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Cagrilintide Alone and in Combination with Semaglutide (Cagrisema) as Anti-Obesity Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, B G Harish, Meha Sharma, Ameya Joshi, Basavanagowdappa Hathur, Abm Kamrul-Hasan","doi":"10.4103/ijem.ijem_45_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No meta-analysis has analysed role of cagrilintide as weight-loss medication in obese individuals. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving obese individuals receiving cagrilintide or cagrilintide-2.4 mg with semaglutide-2.4 mg combination (Cagrisema) compared to placebo/active comparator. Primary outcomes were changes in body weight; secondary outcomes were alterations in glycemia, lipids, and adverse events. From 678 articles, data from 3 RCTs involving 430 individuals were analysed. At 20-32 weeks, patients receiving Cagrisema weekly had significantly greater percentage [mean difference (MD)-9.07% (95%CI: -11.91, -6.23); <i>P</i> < 0.00001;<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 96%] and absolute [MD-9.11 kg (95%CI: -12.84, -5.39); <i>P</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 98%] weight-loss, compared to semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly. At 26-32 weeks, cagrilintide 2.4 mg had a similar percentage [MD - 1.83% (95%CI: -4.08, -0.42); <i>P</i> = 0.11; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 98%] and absolute [MD - 1.88 kg (95%CI: -4.23,0.47); <i>P</i> = 0.12; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 98%] weight-loss, compared to semaglutide/liraglutide. Treatment-emergent and serious adverse events were comparable between groups. Gastrointestinal adverse events and vomiting were significantly higher with Cagrisema compared to semaglutide. Vomiting was significantly lower with cagrilintide compared to semaglutide/liraglutide. Cagrisema outperforms semaglutide regarding weight loss. Cagrilintide shows comparable weight loss to semaglutide/liraglutide with significantly lower vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":13353,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"28 5","pages":"436-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11642503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_45_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No meta-analysis has analysed role of cagrilintide as weight-loss medication in obese individuals. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving obese individuals receiving cagrilintide or cagrilintide-2.4 mg with semaglutide-2.4 mg combination (Cagrisema) compared to placebo/active comparator. Primary outcomes were changes in body weight; secondary outcomes were alterations in glycemia, lipids, and adverse events. From 678 articles, data from 3 RCTs involving 430 individuals were analysed. At 20-32 weeks, patients receiving Cagrisema weekly had significantly greater percentage [mean difference (MD)-9.07% (95%CI: -11.91, -6.23); P < 0.00001;I 2 = 96%] and absolute [MD-9.11 kg (95%CI: -12.84, -5.39); P < 0.00001; I 2 = 98%] weight-loss, compared to semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly. At 26-32 weeks, cagrilintide 2.4 mg had a similar percentage [MD - 1.83% (95%CI: -4.08, -0.42); P = 0.11; I 2 = 98%] and absolute [MD - 1.88 kg (95%CI: -4.23,0.47); P = 0.12; I 2 = 98%] weight-loss, compared to semaglutide/liraglutide. Treatment-emergent and serious adverse events were comparable between groups. Gastrointestinal adverse events and vomiting were significantly higher with Cagrisema compared to semaglutide. Vomiting was significantly lower with cagrilintide compared to semaglutide/liraglutide. Cagrisema outperforms semaglutide regarding weight loss. Cagrilintide shows comparable weight loss to semaglutide/liraglutide with significantly lower vomiting.

单独使用卡格列奈以及与塞马鲁肽(卡格列塞马)联合使用作为抗肥胖药物的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析》。
没有荟萃分析分析卡格列奈作为减肥药物对肥胖者的作用。研究人员在电子数据库中搜索了肥胖患者接受卡格列奈或卡格列奈-2.4 毫克与赛马鲁肽-2.4 毫克复方制剂(Cagrisema)治疗与安慰剂/活性对比剂治疗的 RCT 研究。主要结果是体重变化;次要结果是血糖、血脂和不良事件的变化。从 678 篇文章中,对涉及 430 人的 3 项 RCT 的数据进行了分析。在20-32周时,每周接受卡格列塞马治疗的患者的体重减轻百分比[平均差(MD)-9.07% (95%CI: -11.91, -6.23);P < 0.00001;I 2 = 96%]和绝对值[MD-9.11 kg (95%CI: -12.84, -5.39);P < 0.00001;I 2 = 98%]均显著高于每周接受2.4 mg semaglutide治疗的患者。在26-32周时,卡格列奈2.4毫克的体重减轻百分比[MD - 1.83% (95%CI: -4.08, -0.42);P = 0.11;I 2 = 98%]和绝对值[MD - 1.88 kg (95%CI: -4.23,0.47); P = 0.12;I 2 = 98%]与semaglutide/liraglutide相似。各组间的治疗突发事件和严重不良事件不相上下。与塞马鲁肽相比,卡格列塞马的胃肠道不良事件和呕吐明显较多。与semaglutide/liraglutide相比,卡格列净的呕吐率明显降低。卡格列塞马的减重效果优于semaglutide。卡格列奈的减重效果与舍马鲁肽/利拉鲁肽相当,但呕吐明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism (IJEM) aims to function as the global face of Indian endocrinology research. It aims to act as a bridge between global and national advances in this field. The journal publishes thought-provoking editorials, comprehensive reviews, cutting-edge original research, focused brief communications and insightful letters to editor. The journal encourages authors to submit articles addressing aspects of science related to Endocrinology and Metabolism in particular Diabetology. Articles related to Clinical and Tropical endocrinology are especially encouraged. Sub-topic based Supplements are published regularly. This allows the journal to highlight issues relevant to Endocrine practitioners working in India as well as other countries. IJEM is free access in the true sense of the word, (it charges neither authors nor readers) and this enhances its global appeal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信