Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Percutaneous Extracapsular Transverse Cervical Metatarsal Osteotomy in a Hallux Valgus Sawbone Model.
Pablo Wagner, Emilio Wagner, Miguel Pinochet, David Salinas, Peter Lam
{"title":"Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Percutaneous Extracapsular Transverse Cervical Metatarsal Osteotomy in a Hallux Valgus Sawbone Model.","authors":"Pablo Wagner, Emilio Wagner, Miguel Pinochet, David Salinas, Peter Lam","doi":"10.1177/24730114241303768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited literature available that provide information about fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomies. Our objective was to evaluate the strength of different fixation methods for a percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal (PTCM) osteotomy in a sawbone model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty solid foam sawbone foot models were used. Percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal osteotomies were performed and fixed in a standardized fashion in 6 different groups: (1) one 4.0-mm screw; (2) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) parallel screws; (3) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) divergent screws; (4) same as group 3, but with lateral metatarsal head cortex purchase with the 4.0-mm screw; (5) same as group 4, but with two 4.0-mm screws; (6) same as group 5, but with two 3.5-mm screws. Cyclic and load to failure testing were performed applying a plantar load to the metatarsal head. The measured variables were stiffness and force needed to create deformity using a Zwick Roell Universal Testing Machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 failed as a result of rotational instability in cyclic testing. In load to failure testing, group 3 did not achieve difference compared with group 2 (<i>P</i> = .09) (181 vs 131 N). Group 4 was stronger (<i>P</i> = .02) (250 N) than groups 1-3. Group 5 did not show differences relative to group 4 (<i>P</i> = .1) (223 N). Group 6 was stronger only than groups 1 and 2 (<i>P</i> = .01) (193 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sawbones-based study, we found that the use of two 4.0-mm screws or use of a 3.0-mm screw and a 4.0-mm screw with lateral first metatarsal head cortical purchase was superior to other screw configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"9 4","pages":"24730114241303768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241303768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is limited literature available that provide information about fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomies. Our objective was to evaluate the strength of different fixation methods for a percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal (PTCM) osteotomy in a sawbone model.
Methods: Thirty solid foam sawbone foot models were used. Percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal osteotomies were performed and fixed in a standardized fashion in 6 different groups: (1) one 4.0-mm screw; (2) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) parallel screws; (3) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) divergent screws; (4) same as group 3, but with lateral metatarsal head cortex purchase with the 4.0-mm screw; (5) same as group 4, but with two 4.0-mm screws; (6) same as group 5, but with two 3.5-mm screws. Cyclic and load to failure testing were performed applying a plantar load to the metatarsal head. The measured variables were stiffness and force needed to create deformity using a Zwick Roell Universal Testing Machine.
Results: Group 1 failed as a result of rotational instability in cyclic testing. In load to failure testing, group 3 did not achieve difference compared with group 2 (P = .09) (181 vs 131 N). Group 4 was stronger (P = .02) (250 N) than groups 1-3. Group 5 did not show differences relative to group 4 (P = .1) (223 N). Group 6 was stronger only than groups 1 and 2 (P = .01) (193 N).
Conclusion: In this sawbones-based study, we found that the use of two 4.0-mm screws or use of a 3.0-mm screw and a 4.0-mm screw with lateral first metatarsal head cortical purchase was superior to other screw configurations.