Pharmacotherapeutic actions related to drug interaction alerts - a questionnaire study among Swedish hospital interns and residents in family medicine.
Carina Tukukino, Naldy Parodi López, Johan Lönnbro, Susanna M Wallerstedt, Staffan A Svensson
{"title":"Pharmacotherapeutic actions related to drug interaction alerts - a questionnaire study among Swedish hospital interns and residents in family medicine.","authors":"Carina Tukukino, Naldy Parodi López, Johan Lönnbro, Susanna M Wallerstedt, Staffan A Svensson","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03785-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore how hospital interns and residents specialising in family medicine act on drug interaction alerts in a specific patient case, and on interaction alerts in general.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-page questionnaire, including a fictional patient case (73-year-old woman; 10 drugs in the medication list triggering 11 drug interaction alerts) and questions regarding the use of interaction alerts in general, was distributed to interns and residents during educational sessions (November‒December 2023). The respondents were instructed to consider what actions they would take \"a normal day at work\" due to the risk of interactions between the patients' drugs. In the general questions, the respondents were asked how often they access the detailed interaction information (from 1 = never to 5 = always) provided by the knowledge resource, in relation to the alert classification (D = clinically significant, should be avoided; C = clinically significant, can be handled by, e.g., dose adjustment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 55 interns and 69 residents (response rate: 98%). In the patient case, the respondents acted on a median of 4 (range: 0‒8) drugs, most often concerning repaglinide (in a D interaction alert with clopidogrel; 96% of the interns and 96% of the residents suggested action), and omeprazole (in three C interaction alerts with citalopram, clopidogrel, and levothyroxine, respectively; 71% and 83% suggested action). Among the respondents who answered the questions about how often (rated 4/5) they access more detailed information about interactions, 56 (59%) did so for D versus 29 (31%) for C alerts (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians act on drug interaction alerts selectively, and the alert classifications seem to guide how they are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"301-308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03785-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To explore how hospital interns and residents specialising in family medicine act on drug interaction alerts in a specific patient case, and on interaction alerts in general.
Methods: A 4-page questionnaire, including a fictional patient case (73-year-old woman; 10 drugs in the medication list triggering 11 drug interaction alerts) and questions regarding the use of interaction alerts in general, was distributed to interns and residents during educational sessions (November‒December 2023). The respondents were instructed to consider what actions they would take "a normal day at work" due to the risk of interactions between the patients' drugs. In the general questions, the respondents were asked how often they access the detailed interaction information (from 1 = never to 5 = always) provided by the knowledge resource, in relation to the alert classification (D = clinically significant, should be avoided; C = clinically significant, can be handled by, e.g., dose adjustment).
Results: The questionnaire was completed by 55 interns and 69 residents (response rate: 98%). In the patient case, the respondents acted on a median of 4 (range: 0‒8) drugs, most often concerning repaglinide (in a D interaction alert with clopidogrel; 96% of the interns and 96% of the residents suggested action), and omeprazole (in three C interaction alerts with citalopram, clopidogrel, and levothyroxine, respectively; 71% and 83% suggested action). Among the respondents who answered the questions about how often (rated 4/5) they access more detailed information about interactions, 56 (59%) did so for D versus 29 (31%) for C alerts (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Physicians act on drug interaction alerts selectively, and the alert classifications seem to guide how they are used.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed.
Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor.
Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves
-a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or
-methods that are original in some basic sense, or
-a highly unexpected outcome, or
-conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.