Pharmacotherapeutic actions related to drug interaction alerts - a questionnaire study among Swedish hospital interns and residents in family medicine.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Carina Tukukino, Naldy Parodi López, Johan Lönnbro, Susanna M Wallerstedt, Staffan A Svensson
{"title":"Pharmacotherapeutic actions related to drug interaction alerts - a questionnaire study among Swedish hospital interns and residents in family medicine.","authors":"Carina Tukukino, Naldy Parodi López, Johan Lönnbro, Susanna M Wallerstedt, Staffan A Svensson","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03785-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore how hospital interns and residents specialising in family medicine act on drug interaction alerts in a specific patient case, and on interaction alerts in general.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-page questionnaire, including a fictional patient case (73-year-old woman; 10 drugs in the medication list triggering 11 drug interaction alerts) and questions regarding the use of interaction alerts in general, was distributed to interns and residents during educational sessions (November‒December 2023). The respondents were instructed to consider what actions they would take \"a normal day at work\" due to the risk of interactions between the patients' drugs. In the general questions, the respondents were asked how often they access the detailed interaction information (from 1 = never to 5 = always) provided by the knowledge resource, in relation to the alert classification (D = clinically significant, should be avoided; C = clinically significant, can be handled by, e.g., dose adjustment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 55 interns and 69 residents (response rate: 98%). In the patient case, the respondents acted on a median of 4 (range: 0‒8) drugs, most often concerning repaglinide (in a D interaction alert with clopidogrel; 96% of the interns and 96% of the residents suggested action), and omeprazole (in three C interaction alerts with citalopram, clopidogrel, and levothyroxine, respectively; 71% and 83% suggested action). Among the respondents who answered the questions about how often (rated 4/5) they access more detailed information about interactions, 56 (59%) did so for D versus 29 (31%) for C alerts (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians act on drug interaction alerts selectively, and the alert classifications seem to guide how they are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"301-308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03785-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore how hospital interns and residents specialising in family medicine act on drug interaction alerts in a specific patient case, and on interaction alerts in general.

Methods: A 4-page questionnaire, including a fictional patient case (73-year-old woman; 10 drugs in the medication list triggering 11 drug interaction alerts) and questions regarding the use of interaction alerts in general, was distributed to interns and residents during educational sessions (November‒December 2023). The respondents were instructed to consider what actions they would take "a normal day at work" due to the risk of interactions between the patients' drugs. In the general questions, the respondents were asked how often they access the detailed interaction information (from 1 = never to 5 = always) provided by the knowledge resource, in relation to the alert classification (D = clinically significant, should be avoided; C = clinically significant, can be handled by, e.g., dose adjustment).

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 55 interns and 69 residents (response rate: 98%). In the patient case, the respondents acted on a median of 4 (range: 0‒8) drugs, most often concerning repaglinide (in a D interaction alert with clopidogrel; 96% of the interns and 96% of the residents suggested action), and omeprazole (in three C interaction alerts with citalopram, clopidogrel, and levothyroxine, respectively; 71% and 83% suggested action). Among the respondents who answered the questions about how often (rated 4/5) they access more detailed information about interactions, 56 (59%) did so for D versus 29 (31%) for C alerts (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Physicians act on drug interaction alerts selectively, and the alert classifications seem to guide how they are used.

与药物相互作用警报相关的药物治疗行动--瑞典医院全科实习生和住院医师问卷调查研究。
目的:探讨专门从事家庭医学的医院实习生和住院医生如何处理特定患者病例中的药物相互作用警报,以及一般的相互作用警报。方法:一份4页的调查问卷,包括一个虚构的患者病例(73岁女性;在培训期间(2023年11月至12月),向实习生和住院医生分发了药物清单中触发11个药物相互作用警报的10种药物,以及关于一般使用相互作用警报的问题。受访者被指示考虑他们在“正常工作的一天”会采取什么行动,因为病人的药物之间存在相互作用的风险。在一般问题中,受访者被问及他们访问知识资源提供的详细交互信息的频率(从1 =从不到5 =总是),与警报分类(D =临床显著,应避免;C =临床显著,可通过调整剂量等方式处理)。结果:共有55名实习生和69名住院医师完成问卷调查,回复率为98%。在患者病例中,应答者使用的药物中位数为4种(范围:0-8),最常见的是瑞格列奈(与氯吡格雷相互作用警报为D级;96%的实习生和96%的住院医生建议采取行动)和奥美拉唑(分别与西酞普兰、氯吡格雷和左旋甲状腺素的三个C级相互作用警报;71%和83%建议采取行动)。在回答他们访问相互作用更详细信息的频率(评分为4/5)问题的受访者中,56人(59%)对D级警报这样做,而29人(31%)对C级警报这样做(P结论:医生有选择性地对药物相互作用警报采取行动,警报分类似乎指导了如何使用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信