Perinatal Outcomes in Siblings from Different Conception Methods: In Vitro Fertilization with Autologous Oocyte or Donor Egg vs. Unassisted Medical Conception.
Hila Shalev-Ram, Anat Hershko Klement, Einat Haikin-Herzberger, Mattan Levi, Roni Rahav-Koren, Amir Wiser, Netanella Miller
{"title":"Perinatal Outcomes in Siblings from Different Conception Methods: In Vitro Fertilization with Autologous Oocyte or Donor Egg vs. Unassisted Medical Conception.","authors":"Hila Shalev-Ram, Anat Hershko Klement, Einat Haikin-Herzberger, Mattan Levi, Roni Rahav-Koren, Amir Wiser, Netanella Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the perinatal outcomes of children born from different conception methods: in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous oocytes or IVF with donor egg versus those conceived without medical assistance by using a sibling analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study conducted using electronic medical record data from 2000 through 2018, of a national healthcare organization.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The cohort included mothers who had two pregnancies and their children. Cohort A compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted first conception followed by an IVF conception. Cohort B compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted conception followed by a second pregnancy from oocyte donation.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal outcomes, including small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth (PTB) <37weeks were investigated. Secondary outcomes included low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), and large for gestational age (LGA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohort A comprised women who had 2 medically unassisted pregnancies and those with 1 medically unassisted pregnancy followed by IVF (n=1080 in each). Gestational age at delivery for the second conception was significantly lower in the unassisted + IVF group compared to the medically unassisted group (38.1 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 39.1 ± 1.4 weeks, p=0.001). The unassisted + IVF group had higher rates of prematurity <37 weeks (12% vs. 3.5%, p=0.001) and SGA compared to the medically unassisted group (5.4% vs. 3.4%, p=0.048). The adjusted OR (aOR) for PTB was 3.32 (95% CI, 2.11 to 5.29) and for SGA aOR 1.88 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.32.) Cohort B included 94 women in each group. No differences were found between the medically unassisted and medically unassisted + donor egg groups regarding PTB <37 weeks (p=0.52) and SGA (p=0.32). The rate of LGA was higher in the egg donation group (24% vs. 16.5%, p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This sibling analysis suggests that IVF pregnancies with autologous eggs are more susceptible to PTB, LBW, VLBW, and SGA, while donor egg pregnancies appear relatively unaffected, except for higher rate of LGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To study the perinatal outcomes of children born from different conception methods: in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous oocytes or IVF with donor egg versus those conceived without medical assistance by using a sibling analysis.
Design: Retrospective cohort study conducted using electronic medical record data from 2000 through 2018, of a national healthcare organization.
Subjects: The cohort included mothers who had two pregnancies and their children. Cohort A compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted first conception followed by an IVF conception. Cohort B compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted conception followed by a second pregnancy from oocyte donation.
Exposure: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal outcomes, including small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth (PTB) <37weeks were investigated. Secondary outcomes included low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), and large for gestational age (LGA).
Results: Cohort A comprised women who had 2 medically unassisted pregnancies and those with 1 medically unassisted pregnancy followed by IVF (n=1080 in each). Gestational age at delivery for the second conception was significantly lower in the unassisted + IVF group compared to the medically unassisted group (38.1 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 39.1 ± 1.4 weeks, p=0.001). The unassisted + IVF group had higher rates of prematurity <37 weeks (12% vs. 3.5%, p=0.001) and SGA compared to the medically unassisted group (5.4% vs. 3.4%, p=0.048). The adjusted OR (aOR) for PTB was 3.32 (95% CI, 2.11 to 5.29) and for SGA aOR 1.88 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.32.) Cohort B included 94 women in each group. No differences were found between the medically unassisted and medically unassisted + donor egg groups regarding PTB <37 weeks (p=0.52) and SGA (p=0.32). The rate of LGA was higher in the egg donation group (24% vs. 16.5%, p=0.02).
Conclusions: This sibling analysis suggests that IVF pregnancies with autologous eggs are more susceptible to PTB, LBW, VLBW, and SGA, while donor egg pregnancies appear relatively unaffected, except for higher rate of LGA.
期刊介绍:
Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.