Demographic and Treatment Analysis of Periosteal Osteosarcoma

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70086
Michael C. Larkins
{"title":"Demographic and Treatment Analysis of Periosteal Osteosarcoma","authors":"Michael C. Larkins","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Periosteal osteosarcoma (PO) is a rare bone cancer that makes up between 1% and 6% of osteosarcomas. No epidemiological survey of the United States has been conducted to study this disease, and most of the literature is limited to single-center analyses and case reports. We seek to perform the first such assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was queried for patients with primary PO (ICD-O-3 code 9193/3). Analysis of demographic, disease, and treatment variables was conducted via Fisher's exact test and 20-year cause-specific survival (20y CSS) was assessed via logrank analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-four patients with PO were identified; median age was 20–24 years at diagnosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated surgery provided 20y CSS benefit (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.040) while chemotherapy (CTX) did not (<i>p</i> = 0.29); however, given the limited number of events (<i>n</i> = 11), recalculation of Cox regression for each variable demonstrated significance only with race (<i>p</i> = 0.026). Younger patients were more likely to be diagnosed with PO of the appendicular skeleton compared to the axial skeleton (<i>p</i> = 0.038). Mean survival time was greater among patients diagnosed with appendicular PO (16.0 years [14.2, 17.9]) compared to axial PO (10.9 years [9.5, 12.4]). Stage-stratified survival analysis demonstrated surgery alone was non-inferior to surgery with the addition of CTX (local disease: <i>p</i> = 0.37; regional disease: <i>p</i> = 0.85).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Axial PO is associated with decreased mean 20y CSS compared to appendicular PO, though in general, appendicular PO is more common than axial PO. In keeping with current literature, treatment of PO with CTX in addition to surgery should be reserved for high-risk patients, though its use in the treatment of PO is questionable.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Periosteal osteosarcoma (PO) is a rare bone cancer that makes up between 1% and 6% of osteosarcomas. No epidemiological survey of the United States has been conducted to study this disease, and most of the literature is limited to single-center analyses and case reports. We seek to perform the first such assessment.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was queried for patients with primary PO (ICD-O-3 code 9193/3). Analysis of demographic, disease, and treatment variables was conducted via Fisher's exact test and 20-year cause-specific survival (20y CSS) was assessed via logrank analysis.

Results

Fifty-four patients with PO were identified; median age was 20–24 years at diagnosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated surgery provided 20y CSS benefit (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.08, p = 0.040) while chemotherapy (CTX) did not (p = 0.29); however, given the limited number of events (n = 11), recalculation of Cox regression for each variable demonstrated significance only with race (p = 0.026). Younger patients were more likely to be diagnosed with PO of the appendicular skeleton compared to the axial skeleton (p = 0.038). Mean survival time was greater among patients diagnosed with appendicular PO (16.0 years [14.2, 17.9]) compared to axial PO (10.9 years [9.5, 12.4]). Stage-stratified survival analysis demonstrated surgery alone was non-inferior to surgery with the addition of CTX (local disease: p = 0.37; regional disease: p = 0.85).

Conclusion

Axial PO is associated with decreased mean 20y CSS compared to appendicular PO, though in general, appendicular PO is more common than axial PO. In keeping with current literature, treatment of PO with CTX in addition to surgery should be reserved for high-risk patients, though its use in the treatment of PO is questionable.

Abstract Image

骨膜骨肉瘤的人口统计学和治疗分析
背景和目的:骨膜骨肉瘤(PO)是一种罕见的骨癌,占骨肉瘤的 1%-6%。美国尚未对这种疾病进行流行病学调查,大多数文献仅限于单中心分析和病例报告。我们试图进行首次此类评估:方法:我们向监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划查询了原发性 PO(ICD-O-3 编码 9193/3)患者的情况。通过费雪精确检验对人口统计学、疾病和治疗变量进行了分析,并通过对数秩分析评估了20年病因特异性生存率(20年CSS):结果:共发现 54 名 PO 患者;诊断时的中位年龄为 20-24 岁。多变量分析表明,手术可使患者获得20年CSS生存率(危险比[HR] = 0.08,p = 0.040),而化疗(CTX)则没有(p = 0.29);然而,由于事件数量有限(n = 11),对每个变量重新进行Cox回归计算后发现,只有种族因素具有显著性(p = 0.026)。与轴向骨骼相比,更年轻的患者更有可能被诊断为阑尾骨骼 PO(p = 0.038)。被确诊为阑尾PO的患者的平均生存时间(16.0年 [14.2,17.9])比被确诊为轴向PO的患者(10.9年 [9.5,12.4])长。分期生存分析表明,单纯手术治疗效果不优于加用CTX的手术治疗(局部疾病:P = 0.37;区域性疾病:P = 0.85):结论:与阑尾PO相比,轴向PO与平均20年CSS下降有关,但总体而言,阑尾PO比轴向PO更常见。根据目前的文献,高危患者应在手术的基础上使用 CTX 治疗 PO,但 CTX 在 PO 治疗中的应用尚存疑问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信