Harilaos S Ginis, Spyridon Tsoukalas, Dimitrios Christaras, Pablo Artal
{"title":"Visually relevant on-bench through-focus analysis of intraocular lenses.","authors":"Harilaos S Ginis, Spyridon Tsoukalas, Dimitrios Christaras, Pablo Artal","doi":"10.1364/BOE.540034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cataract surgery involves the implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) to replace the opacified crystalline lens. Monofocal IOLs, the most common type, are intended to have the eye in focus at a given distance, usually at infinity. Simultaneous vision IOLs (SVIOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) aim to minimize postoperative dependence on spectacles by providing either multiple foci or an extended depth of focus. These lenses utilize a variety of diffractive and refractive designs to achieve varied focal depths. While common optical testing methods based on the IOL's modulation transfer function (MTF) or resolving power at best focus are essential for quality control, they do not fully address the lenses' performance requirements in daily visual tasks such as reading in a variety of distances. The purpose of this work was to introduce a visually relevant on-bench test method, which includes an image analysis technique and a visual acuity-related image quality metric, to evaluate the through-focus performance of different commercially available IOLs. This method consists of recording a series of optotype images in a realistic eye model with the IOL, adjusting the stimulus vergence through a focus-tunable lens. We compare the results obtained with mono-focal, enhanced mono-focal, EDOF, and (diffractive) trifocal IOLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8969,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical optics express","volume":"15 12","pages":"7056-7065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11640569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical optics express","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.540034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cataract surgery involves the implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) to replace the opacified crystalline lens. Monofocal IOLs, the most common type, are intended to have the eye in focus at a given distance, usually at infinity. Simultaneous vision IOLs (SVIOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) aim to minimize postoperative dependence on spectacles by providing either multiple foci or an extended depth of focus. These lenses utilize a variety of diffractive and refractive designs to achieve varied focal depths. While common optical testing methods based on the IOL's modulation transfer function (MTF) or resolving power at best focus are essential for quality control, they do not fully address the lenses' performance requirements in daily visual tasks such as reading in a variety of distances. The purpose of this work was to introduce a visually relevant on-bench test method, which includes an image analysis technique and a visual acuity-related image quality metric, to evaluate the through-focus performance of different commercially available IOLs. This method consists of recording a series of optotype images in a realistic eye model with the IOL, adjusting the stimulus vergence through a focus-tunable lens. We compare the results obtained with mono-focal, enhanced mono-focal, EDOF, and (diffractive) trifocal IOLs.
期刊介绍:
The journal''s scope encompasses fundamental research, technology development, biomedical studies and clinical applications. BOEx focuses on the leading edge topics in the field, including:
Tissue optics and spectroscopy
Novel microscopies
Optical coherence tomography
Diffuse and fluorescence tomography
Photoacoustic and multimodal imaging
Molecular imaging and therapies
Nanophotonic biosensing
Optical biophysics/photobiology
Microfluidic optical devices
Vision research.