The Moderating Role of Online Awareness in the Association between Strategy Use and Performance Accuracy on a Test of Functional Cognition in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Daniel Salazar-Frías, María Jesús Funes, Ana Clara Szot, Lucía Laffarga, Alba Navarro-Egido, María Rodríguez-Bailón
{"title":"The Moderating Role of Online Awareness in the Association between Strategy Use and Performance Accuracy on a Test of Functional Cognition in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury.","authors":"Daniel Salazar-Frías, María Jesús Funes, Ana Clara Szot, Lucía Laffarga, Alba Navarro-Egido, María Rodríguez-Bailón","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Deficits in online self-awareness (SA) are common after acquired brain injury (ABI), leading to safety concerns and impacting daily activities and rehabilitation outcomes. Early identification is recommended as a critical first step in cognitive rehabilitation following ABI. The aim of this observational study was to examine differences in online SA and strategy use between individuals with ABI and healthy controls. It also investigated whether online SA moderates the relationship between strategy use and performance accuracy on a test designed to assess cognitive-functional deficits.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>80 individuals with ABI and 76 controls completed the Spanish Weekly Calendar Planning Activity-10. Measures of online SA included strategy use and self-recognized errors assessed during task. An after-task interview assessed individuals' self-evaluation of task difficulty and accuracy of performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with ABI performed worse than controls on most measures of online SA. They were less likely to self-recognize errors and use self-monitoring strategies. They also tended to overestimate their performance and showed greater discrepancy between self-rated and actual performance. Moderation analyses show that better performance was significantly associated with greater strategy use among ABI individuals who were aware of their performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online SA appears to moderate the use of cognitive strategies during functional cognitive performance after ABI. Therefore, it is important to include assessments of online SA and strategy use for individuals with ABI. Furthermore, these findings highlight the importance of focusing on SA and self-generated strategies as key goals of cognitive rehabilitation aimed at improving daily functioning after ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Deficits in online self-awareness (SA) are common after acquired brain injury (ABI), leading to safety concerns and impacting daily activities and rehabilitation outcomes. Early identification is recommended as a critical first step in cognitive rehabilitation following ABI. The aim of this observational study was to examine differences in online SA and strategy use between individuals with ABI and healthy controls. It also investigated whether online SA moderates the relationship between strategy use and performance accuracy on a test designed to assess cognitive-functional deficits.

Method: 80 individuals with ABI and 76 controls completed the Spanish Weekly Calendar Planning Activity-10. Measures of online SA included strategy use and self-recognized errors assessed during task. An after-task interview assessed individuals' self-evaluation of task difficulty and accuracy of performance.

Results: Individuals with ABI performed worse than controls on most measures of online SA. They were less likely to self-recognize errors and use self-monitoring strategies. They also tended to overestimate their performance and showed greater discrepancy between self-rated and actual performance. Moderation analyses show that better performance was significantly associated with greater strategy use among ABI individuals who were aware of their performance.

Conclusions: Online SA appears to moderate the use of cognitive strategies during functional cognitive performance after ABI. Therefore, it is important to include assessments of online SA and strategy use for individuals with ABI. Furthermore, these findings highlight the importance of focusing on SA and self-generated strategies as key goals of cognitive rehabilitation aimed at improving daily functioning after ABI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信