Patient Education for CKD and Decision Support in Primary Care: Findings From the EPIK Pilot Study.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Julie Wright Nunes, Eve Kerr, Akinlolu Ojo, Corey Powell, Audrey Fan, F John Brinley, Anita Devine, Tammy Ellies, Katie Grzyb, Luis Garcia-Guzman, Tejpreet Nakai, Andrea Oliverio, Emily Chen, Angela Fagerlin
{"title":"Patient Education for CKD and Decision Support in Primary Care: Findings From the EPIK Pilot Study.","authors":"Julie Wright Nunes, Eve Kerr, Akinlolu Ojo, Corey Powell, Audrey Fan, F John Brinley, Anita Devine, Tammy Ellies, Katie Grzyb, Luis Garcia-Guzman, Tejpreet Nakai, Andrea Oliverio, Emily Chen, Angela Fagerlin","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects millions of people in the United States, yet effective interventions to address gaps in patient knowledge and engagement are not well-established. We developed and pilot tested a brief educational decision aid for patients with CKD who are being treated in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pilot quality improvement (QI) study of a decision aid intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting & participants: </strong>The decision aid was introduced and used in 1 of 2 general internal medicine primary care clinics for adult patients with CKD.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>An electronic medical record-based patient educational decision aid called the Encounter Decision Intervention (EDI) developed using QI methods and with input from patients and clinicians for use during primary care visits to address a CKD diagnosis and engage patients in their clinical management.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Perceived and objective CKD knowledge, CKD-specific stress, and patient satisfaction measured in both primary care clinics as assessed using validated surveys.</p><p><strong>Analytical approach: </strong>Fisher exact tests, t tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to detect univariable associations of outcomes with use of the EDI across primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four patients completed the study (37 in each clinic). There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the clinics. The group treated in the clinic that used the EDI had statistically significantly higher satisfaction with their clinicians, with clinician communication, and with their overall care. The patients reported high satisfaction with the EDI, and the clinicians reported favorable usability.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A nonrandomized comparison, small sample size, and possible differences across practice settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A new integrated educational decision aid was successfully implemented in a primary care setting. Pilot testing suggested that the EDI was associated with higher patient satisfaction with their primary care provider, with their clinician's communication, and with their overall care.</p><p><strong>Plain-language summary: </strong>Most patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD) are not aware of their illness. Few studies have explored whether patient education can increase patients' knowledge about CKD or influence patients' satisfaction with the care or communication they receive from their physicians. This study tested whether a short CKD education intervention implemented by the patient's physician was associated with patients' greater awareness of their CKD as well as their satisfaction with care and communication. This pilot study found that a decision aid for patients with CKD was implementable in a primary care setting. Patients who received CKD education felt more satisfied with their care and communication with their physicians compared with patients who did not receive the education.</p>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.10.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects millions of people in the United States, yet effective interventions to address gaps in patient knowledge and engagement are not well-established. We developed and pilot tested a brief educational decision aid for patients with CKD who are being treated in primary care settings.

Study design: Pilot quality improvement (QI) study of a decision aid intervention.

Setting & participants: The decision aid was introduced and used in 1 of 2 general internal medicine primary care clinics for adult patients with CKD.

Exposure: An electronic medical record-based patient educational decision aid called the Encounter Decision Intervention (EDI) developed using QI methods and with input from patients and clinicians for use during primary care visits to address a CKD diagnosis and engage patients in their clinical management.

Outcome: Perceived and objective CKD knowledge, CKD-specific stress, and patient satisfaction measured in both primary care clinics as assessed using validated surveys.

Analytical approach: Fisher exact tests, t tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to detect univariable associations of outcomes with use of the EDI across primary care clinics.

Results: Seventy-four patients completed the study (37 in each clinic). There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the clinics. The group treated in the clinic that used the EDI had statistically significantly higher satisfaction with their clinicians, with clinician communication, and with their overall care. The patients reported high satisfaction with the EDI, and the clinicians reported favorable usability.

Limitations: A nonrandomized comparison, small sample size, and possible differences across practice settings.

Conclusions: A new integrated educational decision aid was successfully implemented in a primary care setting. Pilot testing suggested that the EDI was associated with higher patient satisfaction with their primary care provider, with their clinician's communication, and with their overall care.

Plain-language summary: Most patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD) are not aware of their illness. Few studies have explored whether patient education can increase patients' knowledge about CKD or influence patients' satisfaction with the care or communication they receive from their physicians. This study tested whether a short CKD education intervention implemented by the patient's physician was associated with patients' greater awareness of their CKD as well as their satisfaction with care and communication. This pilot study found that a decision aid for patients with CKD was implementable in a primary care setting. Patients who received CKD education felt more satisfied with their care and communication with their physicians compared with patients who did not receive the education.

初级保健中的CKD患者教育和决策支持:来自EPIK试点研究的发现。
理由和目标:慢性肾脏病影响着美国数百万人,但解决患者知识和参与度差距的有效干预措施尚未确立。我们试图为在初级医疗机构接受治疗的慢性肾脏病患者开发并试点一种简短的教育决策辅助工具:研究设计:决策辅助干预的试点 QI 研究:在两个普通内科初级医疗诊所中的一个诊所为慢性肾脏病成年患者引入并使用了决策辅助工具:采用质量改进方法,根据患者和临床医生的意见,开发了一种基于 EMR 的患者教育决策辅助工具,称为 "就诊决策干预"(EDI),在初级保健就诊时使用,以解决慢性肾脏病诊断问题,并让患者参与临床管理:结果:在两个初级保健诊所中,通过对 CKD 知识的感知和客观性、CKD 特定压力和患者满意度进行有效调查,对结果进行评估:分析方法:采用费舍尔精确检验、t 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验来检测结果与各初级保健诊所使用 EDI 的单变量关联:74名患者完成了研究(每个诊所37名)。不同诊所的患者特征在统计学上没有明显差异。在使用电子数据交换系统的诊所接受治疗的一组患者对临床医生的沟通、整体护理和临床医生的满意度在统计学上明显更高。患者对电子数据交换系统的满意度较高,临床医生对其可用性表示满意:局限性:非随机比较,样本量小,不同实践环境可能存在差异:结论:一种新的综合教育决策辅助工具在基层医疗机构成功实施。试点测试表明,EDI 与患者对临床医生沟通、整体护理和初级保健提供者的更高满意度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信