Identifying NH3 emission mitigation techniques from farm to field using a Bayesian network.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123636
N Dal Ferro, G Fabbri, F Gottardo, M Mencaroni, B Lazzaro, F Morari
{"title":"Identifying NH<sub>3</sub> emission mitigation techniques from farm to field using a Bayesian network.","authors":"N Dal Ferro, G Fabbri, F Gottardo, M Mencaroni, B Lazzaro, F Morari","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study addresses the challenge of reducing ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) emissions from agriculture by evaluating various mitigation techniques. The research utilized a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to integrate quantitative data on NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization reduction with qualitative stakeholder perceptions, aiming to identify the best available techniques (BATs) that balance environmental, economic, and socio-cultural factors for farmers in the Veneto region of Italy. The BBN framework established probabilistic dependencies between variables related to livestock, crop type, manure storage, fertilization management, and pedo-climatic conditions. Stakeholder opinions were quantified through a value elicitation process and combined with the BBN to create an integrated Influence Diagram (ID). Results indicated that effective NH<sub>3</sub> reduction requires a comprehensive approach across the entire agri-livestock supply chain. Based on the results obtained, no single technique clearly emerged as the primary focus, rather various areas would require improvement across the agri-livestock supply chain. However, if prioritizing techniques were necessary, efforts should concentrate on stable management of infirmary animals (HC<sub>Inf</sub>), overcrowding reduction by decreasing the number of animals on densely populated farms (OC<sub>-Animal</sub>), and optimization of protein in animal ration (FD<sub>Prot</sub>). These measures should be combined with effective manure application through slurry injection (INJ<sub>Slu</sub>) in the field. Stakeholders showed reluctance towards more expensive or innovative methods, indicating that socio-cultural perceptions and economic feasibility can heavily influence the adoption of new technologies although they proved to be among the most environmentally effective. The primary insight from applying the BBNs was that selecting effective techniques necessitates a multi-perspective approach to foster consensus among stakeholders throughout the agri-livestock supply chain.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"373 ","pages":"123636"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of reducing ammonia (NH3) emissions from agriculture by evaluating various mitigation techniques. The research utilized a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to integrate quantitative data on NH3 volatilization reduction with qualitative stakeholder perceptions, aiming to identify the best available techniques (BATs) that balance environmental, economic, and socio-cultural factors for farmers in the Veneto region of Italy. The BBN framework established probabilistic dependencies between variables related to livestock, crop type, manure storage, fertilization management, and pedo-climatic conditions. Stakeholder opinions were quantified through a value elicitation process and combined with the BBN to create an integrated Influence Diagram (ID). Results indicated that effective NH3 reduction requires a comprehensive approach across the entire agri-livestock supply chain. Based on the results obtained, no single technique clearly emerged as the primary focus, rather various areas would require improvement across the agri-livestock supply chain. However, if prioritizing techniques were necessary, efforts should concentrate on stable management of infirmary animals (HCInf), overcrowding reduction by decreasing the number of animals on densely populated farms (OC-Animal), and optimization of protein in animal ration (FDProt). These measures should be combined with effective manure application through slurry injection (INJSlu) in the field. Stakeholders showed reluctance towards more expensive or innovative methods, indicating that socio-cultural perceptions and economic feasibility can heavily influence the adoption of new technologies although they proved to be among the most environmentally effective. The primary insight from applying the BBNs was that selecting effective techniques necessitates a multi-perspective approach to foster consensus among stakeholders throughout the agri-livestock supply chain.

使用贝叶斯网络确定从农场到农田的NH3排放减缓技术。
本研究通过评估各种缓解技术,解决了减少农业氨(NH3)排放的挑战。该研究利用贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)将减少NH3挥发的定量数据与定性利益相关者的看法相结合,旨在为意大利威尼托地区的农民确定平衡环境、经济和社会文化因素的最佳可用技术(BATs)。BBN框架建立了与牲畜、作物类型、粪肥储存、施肥管理和土壤气候条件相关的变量之间的概率依赖关系。利益相关者的意见通过价值激发过程进行量化,并与BBN相结合,形成一个综合影响图(ID)。结果表明,有效减少NH3需要在整个农畜供应链中采取综合措施。根据所获得的结果,没有一种技术明确成为主要重点,而是在整个农业-畜牧业供应链的各个领域都需要改进。然而,如果有必要优先考虑技术,则应将努力集中在对医院动物的稳定管理(HCInf),通过减少人口密集农场的动物数量(OC-Animal)来减少过度拥挤(OC-Animal),以及优化动物口粮中的蛋白质(FDProt)。这些措施应与田间有效施肥(INJSlu)相结合。利益攸关方表示不愿采用更昂贵或更创新的方法,这表明社会文化观念和经济可行性会严重影响新技术的采用,尽管这些技术已被证明是最具环境效益的技术之一。应用bbn的主要见解是,选择有效的技术需要多视角的方法,以促进整个农业-畜牧业供应链的利益相关者之间的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信