An explicit robust optimization framework for multipurpose cascade reservoir operation considering inflow uncertainty

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Shaokun He, YiBo Wang, Dimitri Solomatine, Xiao Li
{"title":"An explicit robust optimization framework for multipurpose cascade reservoir operation considering inflow uncertainty","authors":"Shaokun He, YiBo Wang, Dimitri Solomatine, Xiao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long-term water resource management involving multipurpose coordination requires robust decision-making in water infrastructure cases to cope with various types of uncertainties. Traditional robust optimization methods generally do not explicitly propagate input or parametric uncertainties into estimates of the robustness of solutions, which limits their ability to address uncertainty comprehensively across solution spaces. In this study, we introduce an explicit robust decision-making framework that blends multiobjective search, probabilistic analysis of robustness, and diagnostic verification tools to identify robust optimal solutions to external uncertainty. The proposed framework is illustrated on four diverse robustness formulations, which capture a wide variety of stakeholder attitudes from highly risk-averse to risk-neutral, for the primary operating objectives (hydropower production, water diversion, and hydrological alteration degree) in China's Hanjiang cascade reservoir system. By analyzing the Pareto front propagated from inflow uncertainty, it is found that optimal robust policies with a significantly higher degree of hydrological alteration are preferred in most formulations to achieve relatively lower joint uncertainty of hydropower and water diversion. These policies also yield sufficiently stable model performance in the case of an out-of-sample streamflow set during diagnostic verification. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of four different formulations suggests that a composite normalized robustness indicator (<ce:italic>NRI</ce:italic>) developed in this study to integrate various robustness metrics can achieve an effective balance for all considered objectives. These findings highlight the benefits of explicit robust optimization for managing hydrological uncertainties in multipurpose cascade reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term water resource management involving multipurpose coordination requires robust decision-making in water infrastructure cases to cope with various types of uncertainties. Traditional robust optimization methods generally do not explicitly propagate input or parametric uncertainties into estimates of the robustness of solutions, which limits their ability to address uncertainty comprehensively across solution spaces. In this study, we introduce an explicit robust decision-making framework that blends multiobjective search, probabilistic analysis of robustness, and diagnostic verification tools to identify robust optimal solutions to external uncertainty. The proposed framework is illustrated on four diverse robustness formulations, which capture a wide variety of stakeholder attitudes from highly risk-averse to risk-neutral, for the primary operating objectives (hydropower production, water diversion, and hydrological alteration degree) in China's Hanjiang cascade reservoir system. By analyzing the Pareto front propagated from inflow uncertainty, it is found that optimal robust policies with a significantly higher degree of hydrological alteration are preferred in most formulations to achieve relatively lower joint uncertainty of hydropower and water diversion. These policies also yield sufficiently stable model performance in the case of an out-of-sample streamflow set during diagnostic verification. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of four different formulations suggests that a composite normalized robustness indicator (NRI) developed in this study to integrate various robustness metrics can achieve an effective balance for all considered objectives. These findings highlight the benefits of explicit robust optimization for managing hydrological uncertainties in multipurpose cascade reservoirs.
考虑流入量不确定性的多用途梯级水库运行显式稳健优化框架
涉及多用途协调的长期水资源管理要求在水利基础设施案例中进行稳健决策,以应对各种类型的不确定性。传统的稳健优化方法一般不会明确地将输入或参数的不确定性传播到对解决方案稳健性的估计中,这限制了其在解决方案空间中全面应对不确定性的能力。在本研究中,我们引入了一个明确的稳健决策框架,该框架融合了多目标搜索、稳健性概率分析和诊断验证工具,可识别外部不确定性的稳健最优解。针对中国汉江梯级水库系统的主要运行目标(水电生产、引水和水文变化程度),提出了四种不同的稳健性公式,反映了从高度规避风险到风险中性的各种利益相关者态度。通过分析流入量不确定性所传播的帕累托前沿,发现在大多数公式中,水文改变程度明显较高的最优稳健政策更受青睐,从而实现相对较低的水电和引水联合不确定性。在诊断验证过程中出现样本外流量集的情况下,这些策略也能产生足够稳定的模型性能。此外,对四种不同方案的比较分析表明,本研究开发的综合归一化鲁棒性指标(NRI)整合了各种鲁棒性指标,可以有效平衡所有考虑的目标。这些发现凸显了显式鲁棒性优化在管理多用途梯级水库水文不确定性方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Modelling & Software
Environmental Modelling & Software 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
241
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信