Empagliflozin to prevent worsening of left ventricular volumes and systolic function after myocardial infarction (EMPRESS‐MI)

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jaclyn Carberry, Mark C. Petrie, Matthew M.Y. Lee, Bethany Stanley, Katriona J.M. Brooksbank, Ross T. Campbell, Richard Good, Pardeep S. Jhund, Peter Kellman, Ninian N. Lang, M. Mitchell Lindsay, Kenneth Mangion, Roy S. Gardner, Patrick B. Mark, Barbara Meyer, Joanne O'Donnell, Vanessa Orchard, Aadil Shaukat, Stuart Watkins, Alex McConnachie, John J.V. McMurray, Paul Welsh, Naveed Sattar, Colin Berry, Kieran F. Docherty
{"title":"Empagliflozin to prevent worsening of left ventricular volumes and systolic function after myocardial infarction (EMPRESS‐MI)","authors":"Jaclyn Carberry, Mark C. Petrie, Matthew M.Y. Lee, Bethany Stanley, Katriona J.M. Brooksbank, Ross T. Campbell, Richard Good, Pardeep S. Jhund, Peter Kellman, Ninian N. Lang, M. Mitchell Lindsay, Kenneth Mangion, Roy S. Gardner, Patrick B. Mark, Barbara Meyer, Joanne O'Donnell, Vanessa Orchard, Aadil Shaukat, Stuart Watkins, Alex McConnachie, John J.V. McMurray, Paul Welsh, Naveed Sattar, Colin Berry, Kieran F. Docherty","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsPatients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) are considered to be at risk of progressive adverse cardiac remodelling which can lead to the development of heart failure and death. The early addition of a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to standard treatment may delay or prevent progressive adverse remodelling in these patients.Methods and resultsWe performed a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicentre trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following MI. Eligible patients were those ≥12 h and ≤14 days following acute MI, with an LVEF &lt;45% by MRI. Patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once a day or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular end‐systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVI) from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included measures of left ventricular and atrial volumes, left ventricular mass, LVEF, and high‐sensitivity troponin I (hs‐TnI) and N‐terminal prohormone of B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations. From October 2022 to January 2024, 105 eligible patients were randomized. The mean age was 63 ± 11 years and 90 (87%) were male. The mean LVEF was 34.8 ± 6.0%. In the placebo group, LVESVI decreased by 7.8 ± 16.3 ml/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, left ventricular end‐diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) did not change (−0.3 ± 18.7 ml/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and LVEF increased by 8.5 ± 7.4% at 24 weeks from baseline. Empagliflozin did not affect the change in LVESVI from baseline to 24 weeks (between‐group difference = 0.3 ml/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, 95% confidence interval −5.2 to 5.8; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.92). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin also had no effect on LVEDVI, LVEF, left atrial volume index, left ventricular mass index, NT‐proBNP, or hs‐TnI, but did increase haematocrit and reduced uric acid and weight.ConclusionsIn patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after an acute MI receiving contemporary standard of care, treatment with empagliflozin had no effect on cardiac volumes or LVEF compared with placebo. Progressive adverse cardiac remodelling did not occur in the majority of patients.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimsPatients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) are considered to be at risk of progressive adverse cardiac remodelling which can lead to the development of heart failure and death. The early addition of a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to standard treatment may delay or prevent progressive adverse remodelling in these patients.Methods and resultsWe performed a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicentre trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following MI. Eligible patients were those ≥12 h and ≤14 days following acute MI, with an LVEF <45% by MRI. Patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once a day or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular end‐systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVI) from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included measures of left ventricular and atrial volumes, left ventricular mass, LVEF, and high‐sensitivity troponin I (hs‐TnI) and N‐terminal prohormone of B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations. From October 2022 to January 2024, 105 eligible patients were randomized. The mean age was 63 ± 11 years and 90 (87%) were male. The mean LVEF was 34.8 ± 6.0%. In the placebo group, LVESVI decreased by 7.8 ± 16.3 ml/m2, left ventricular end‐diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) did not change (−0.3 ± 18.7 ml/m2) and LVEF increased by 8.5 ± 7.4% at 24 weeks from baseline. Empagliflozin did not affect the change in LVESVI from baseline to 24 weeks (between‐group difference = 0.3 ml/m2, 95% confidence interval −5.2 to 5.8; p = 0.92). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin also had no effect on LVEDVI, LVEF, left atrial volume index, left ventricular mass index, NT‐proBNP, or hs‐TnI, but did increase haematocrit and reduced uric acid and weight.ConclusionsIn patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after an acute MI receiving contemporary standard of care, treatment with empagliflozin had no effect on cardiac volumes or LVEF compared with placebo. Progressive adverse cardiac remodelling did not occur in the majority of patients.
恩格列净预防心肌梗死后左心室容量和收缩功能恶化(EMPRESS - MI)
急性心肌梗死(MI)后左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者被认为有进行性不良心脏重构的风险,这可能导致心力衰竭和死亡的发展。早期在标准治疗中加入钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂可能会延迟或防止这些患者的进行性不良重构。方法和结果我们采用心血管磁共振成像(MRI)进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心试验,研究对象是心肌梗死后出现左室收缩功能障碍的患者。符合条件的患者是急性心肌梗死后≥12小时,≤14天,MRI显示LVEF为45%的患者。患者被随机分配到恩格列净10mg /天或匹配安慰剂组。主要终点是左心室收缩期终末容积与体表面积(LVESVI)从基线到24周的变化。次要结局包括左室和心房容积、左室质量、LVEF、高敏感性肌钙蛋白I (hs - TnI)和B型利钠肽N端原激素(NT - proBNP)浓度的测量。从2022年10月到2024年1月,105名符合条件的患者被随机化。平均年龄63±11岁,男性90例(87%)。平均LVEF为34.8±6.0%。在安慰剂组,LVESVI降低了7.8±16.3 ml/m2,左室舒张末期容积指数(LVEDVI)没有变化(- 0.3±18.7 ml/m2), LVEF在24周时较基线增加了8.5±7.4%。恩帕列净不影响LVESVI从基线到24周的变化(组间差异= 0.3 ml/m2, 95%置信区间为- 5.2至5.8;P = 0.92)。与安慰剂相比,恩格列净对LVEDVI、LVEF、左心房容积指数、左心室质量指数、NT‐proBNP或hs‐TnI也没有影响,但确实增加了红细胞压积,降低了尿酸和体重。结论:急性心肌梗死后左室收缩功能障碍患者接受当代标准治疗,与安慰剂相比,恩格列净治疗对心脏容量或LVEF没有影响。大多数患者未发生进行性不良心脏重构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信