Effect of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on Live Birth Rate in Young Women With Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicentre Randomised Trial
Hengyu Guan, Yaqiong He, Yao Lu, Jiaan Huang, Yuan Wang, Qinling Zhu, Jia Qi, Wen Lin, Steven R. Lindheim, Zhe Wei, Ying Ding, Yun Sun
{"title":"Effect of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on Live Birth Rate in Young Women With Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicentre Randomised Trial","authors":"Hengyu Guan, Yaqiong He, Yao Lu, Jiaan Huang, Yuan Wang, Qinling Zhu, Jia Qi, Wen Lin, Steven R. Lindheim, Zhe Wei, Ying Ding, Yun Sun","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the benefit of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in recurrent implantation failure (RIF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Eight academic fertility centres in China, 2018–2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 485 infertile women aged < 38 years were evaluated. They had a history of two or more unsuccessful embryo transfer cycles with at least three good-quality embryos that had been transferred cumulatively and underwent a single blastocyst transfer with or without PGT-A. Those with thin endometrium or recurrent pregnancy loss were excluded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients were categorised into PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups. All pregnancies were followed to delivery. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were obtained from obstetric and neonatal medical records. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to adjust for potential confounding factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>LBR per embryo transfer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result(s)</h3>\n \n <p>There was no significant difference in LBR between the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups both before (39.1% vs. 41.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.760) and after (39.1% vs. 40.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.862) PSM. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models revealed no beneficial effect of PGT-A on LBR per embryo transfer (crude odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.49–1.69; adjusted odds ratio: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.53–2.03). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications was not significantly different between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with RIF aged < 38 years do not benefit from PGT-A. Thus, factors other than genetic abnormalities may contribute to this clinical conundrum.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S2","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the benefit of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
Design
Secondary analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Setting
Eight academic fertility centres in China, 2018–2020.
Population
Overall, 485 infertile women aged < 38 years were evaluated. They had a history of two or more unsuccessful embryo transfer cycles with at least three good-quality embryos that had been transferred cumulatively and underwent a single blastocyst transfer with or without PGT-A. Those with thin endometrium or recurrent pregnancy loss were excluded.
Methods
Patients were categorised into PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups. All pregnancies were followed to delivery. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were obtained from obstetric and neonatal medical records. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to adjust for potential confounding factors.
Main Outcome Measures
LBR per embryo transfer.
Result(s)
There was no significant difference in LBR between the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups both before (39.1% vs. 41.5%, p = 0.760) and after (39.1% vs. 40.6%, p = 0.862) PSM. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models revealed no beneficial effect of PGT-A on LBR per embryo transfer (crude odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.49–1.69; adjusted odds ratio: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.53–2.03). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications was not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusions
Patients with RIF aged < 38 years do not benefit from PGT-A. Thus, factors other than genetic abnormalities may contribute to this clinical conundrum.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.