Séverine Nozownik , Tacha Hicks , Patrick Basset , Vincent Castella
{"title":"Searching national DNA databases with complex DNA profiles: An empirical study using probabilistic genotyping","authors":"Séverine Nozownik , Tacha Hicks , Patrick Basset , Vincent Castella","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In most National DNA databases (NDNADB), only single source DNA profiles, and sometimes two-person DNA mixtures, can be searched provided a minimum number of loci (or alleles) is available. DNA profiles that do not meet these criteria (about 14 % of the traces analyzed in Western Switzerland) can be compared locally with candidates upon request from police services, used for one-off search, or remain unused. With the advent of probabilistic genotyping (PG), such complex DNA profiles can be compared to those stored in NDNADB based on likelihood ratios (LRs). In this pilot study, traces of known contributors and casework DNA profiles were used to evaluate the performance of the DBLR™ “Search database” tool in conjunction with the Swiss NDNADB. First, 40 DNA mixtures (2–5 contributors) from 15 volunteers were prepared in the wet laboratory. They were deconvoluted with STRmix™ and compared to a database containing the DNA profiles of these 15 volunteers, along with 174,493 person DNA profiles from the Swiss NDNADB (ground-truth experiments). Using LR thresholds of 10<sup>3</sup> and 10<sup>6</sup>, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 90.0 %/57.1 % and 99.9 %/100.0 %. For the lower LR threshold, this resulted in 52 adventitious associations out of more than 24 million pairwise comparisons. Second, 160 DNA mixture profiles from casework (2–4 contributors) that had previously been locally compared were searched with DBLR™ using the same conditions as for phase 1. With the 10<sup>3</sup> LR threshold, 380 associations were retrieved: 194 of these corresponded to expected associations, as they were previously made through the local comparisons with known persons, and 186 were new. With the 10<sup>6</sup> LR threshold, 199 associations were recovered of which 180 were expected and 19 new. This demonstrates that even with complex DNA profiles (up to 4 contributors) all expected associations were retrieved with a limited number of candidates per trace. Database searches of complex DNA mixtures allow for the generation of leads early in an investigation for DNA profiles that might otherwise remain underutilized. Next steps for the possible integration of DBLR™ or similar software within an operational context will require discussions on legal, financial, and technical aspects among stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 103208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324002047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In most National DNA databases (NDNADB), only single source DNA profiles, and sometimes two-person DNA mixtures, can be searched provided a minimum number of loci (or alleles) is available. DNA profiles that do not meet these criteria (about 14 % of the traces analyzed in Western Switzerland) can be compared locally with candidates upon request from police services, used for one-off search, or remain unused. With the advent of probabilistic genotyping (PG), such complex DNA profiles can be compared to those stored in NDNADB based on likelihood ratios (LRs). In this pilot study, traces of known contributors and casework DNA profiles were used to evaluate the performance of the DBLR™ “Search database” tool in conjunction with the Swiss NDNADB. First, 40 DNA mixtures (2–5 contributors) from 15 volunteers were prepared in the wet laboratory. They were deconvoluted with STRmix™ and compared to a database containing the DNA profiles of these 15 volunteers, along with 174,493 person DNA profiles from the Swiss NDNADB (ground-truth experiments). Using LR thresholds of 103 and 106, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 90.0 %/57.1 % and 99.9 %/100.0 %. For the lower LR threshold, this resulted in 52 adventitious associations out of more than 24 million pairwise comparisons. Second, 160 DNA mixture profiles from casework (2–4 contributors) that had previously been locally compared were searched with DBLR™ using the same conditions as for phase 1. With the 103 LR threshold, 380 associations were retrieved: 194 of these corresponded to expected associations, as they were previously made through the local comparisons with known persons, and 186 were new. With the 106 LR threshold, 199 associations were recovered of which 180 were expected and 19 new. This demonstrates that even with complex DNA profiles (up to 4 contributors) all expected associations were retrieved with a limited number of candidates per trace. Database searches of complex DNA mixtures allow for the generation of leads early in an investigation for DNA profiles that might otherwise remain underutilized. Next steps for the possible integration of DBLR™ or similar software within an operational context will require discussions on legal, financial, and technical aspects among stakeholders.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts.
The scope of the journal includes:
Forensic applications of human polymorphism.
Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies.
Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms.
Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications.
Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation.
Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest.
Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems.
DNA typing methodologies and strategies.
Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics.
Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches.
Standards in forensic genetics.
Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards.
Quality control.
Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies.
Criminal DNA databases.
Technical, legal and statistical issues.
General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.