Nothing Feels Better Than Home: Why Must Nursing-Led Integrated Care Interventions for Older People With Chronic Conditions in Hospital-At-Home Be Considered?
Rachid Akrour, Henk Verloo, Philip Larkin, Patrizia D'Amelio
{"title":"Nothing Feels Better Than Home: Why Must Nursing-Led Integrated Care Interventions for Older People With Chronic Conditions in Hospital-At-Home Be Considered?","authors":"Rachid Akrour, Henk Verloo, Philip Larkin, Patrizia D'Amelio","doi":"10.1111/opn.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hospitalisation of older adults with a chronic conditions is associated with higher risk of nosocomial infections, delirium, falls, functional decline and even early mortality (Richardson <span>2006</span>; Sharek et al. <span>2011</span>; Shepperd et al. <span>2017</span>; Sprivulis et al. <span>2006</span>; Vasilevskis et al. <span>2012</span>). Hospital-at-Home (HaH) interventions provide acute care treatments of a predetermined duration in the patient's home as an alternative to traditional hospital care. These interventions could shorten a hospital stay by enabling an early discharge or even becoming a complete substitution for hospital care. This would allow for continuity of acute care at home over a proscribed period of time (Gonçalves-Bradley et al. <span>2017</span>; Shepperd et al. <span>2016</span>; Shepperd and Iliffe <span>1998</span>). HaH interventions were developed to minimise, or even avoid, the potential iatrogenic effects of hospitalisation, improve patient and caregiver satisfaction, and reduce healthcare costs (Leong, Lim, and Lai <span>2021</span>). There is growing evidence from systematic reviews demonstrating the effectiveness of HaH interventions on patient outcomes with lower mortality, reduced readmissions and lengths of stay, lower risk of long-term care admission, lower depression and anxiety reduced costs, and improved patient satisfaction (Arsenault-Lapierre et al. <span>2021</span>; Caplan et al. <span>2012</span>; Conley et al. <span>2016</span>; Leong, Lim, and Lai <span>2021</span>). Patients with chronic diseases who presented to emergency departments and then received HaH interventions had lower risks of readmission and long-term admission. They also showed lower rates of depression and anxiety than patients who had received inpatient care (Arsenault-Lapierre et al. <span>2021</span>). Moreover, a meta-analysis and a scoping review showed that patients and caregivers had positive perceptions and experiences with HaH services (Chua et al. <span>2022</span>; Wang, Stewart, and Lee <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Older people with chronic conditions are prone to multiple specialist follow-ups, thereby generating significant care fragmentation (Le Couteur, Flicker, and Hilmer <span>2022</span>; Sadler et al. <span>2023</span>). Care fragmentation leads to adverse health outcomes and undermines patient's care experiences (Duan-Porter et al. <span>2020</span>), and contributes also to risks of medication errors (Daunt, Curtin, and O'Mahony <span>2023</span>; Squires et al. <span>2020</span>). Deficiencies in prioritising patient-centred care and in the multidisciplinary continuity of care have, nevertheless, been identified (Wang, Stewart, and Lee <span>2024</span>). In fact, the complex needs of an older people with multiple chronic conditions cannot be adequately addressed by a single healthcare professional; they require coordination and multidisciplinary collaboration (Araujo de Carvalho et al. <span>2017</span>; Larsen, Broberger, and Petersson <span>2017</span>). Thus, the World Health Organization recommends implementing integrated care models that ensure the continuity of care for older people with chronic conditions and minimise the fragmentation of care (World Health Organization <span>2017</span>). Care coordination supported by nurses in an integrated healthcare model is effective for older people (Prajankett and Markaki <span>2021</span>). Nurse-led intervention models demonstrated improved patient outcomes in terms of care coordination (Gabbard et al. <span>2021</span>; McParland, Johnston, and Cooper <span>2022</span>), primary and secondary prevention and management of chronic diseases (Beks et al. <span>2023</span>), hospital admissions (Imhof et al. <span>2012</span>), emergency room visits (Counsell et al. <span>2007</span>), mortality (Dorr et al. <span>2008</span>), physical functioning, nutritional status and quality of life (Kasa et al. <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Although recent decades have seen considerable scientific research on providing HaH interventions for older people with chronic conditions, there has been comparatively little investigation of those interventions specifically led by nurses. A literature and bibliometric search examining published articles in Medline Ovid SP up to February 21, 2024, using the search string in Appendix, comparing published studies involving HaH interventions in general and nurse-led interventions in HaH for older adults with chronic conditions showed a lack of published research on the impact of nurse-led interventions models in HaH (Figure 1).</p><p>It is important that future nursing research should focus on highlighting the role and impact of nurse-led interventions in HaH on the outcomes of older people and caregivers but also on health systems. Moreover, the effectiveness of nurse-led models in this domain requires rigorous evaluation through retrospective, prospective and interventional studies. This will enhance our understanding and increase our knowledge of HaH care options that can be proposed to older people with chronic conditions. It will also give policymakers and healthcare institutions arguments for expanding efficient, home-based, person-centred care for this population.</p><p>R.A. contributed to the design, data analysis and writing the article. P.D., H.V. and P.L. supervised, corrected and contributed to the editing of this article.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hospitalisation of older adults with a chronic conditions is associated with higher risk of nosocomial infections, delirium, falls, functional decline and even early mortality (Richardson 2006; Sharek et al. 2011; Shepperd et al. 2017; Sprivulis et al. 2006; Vasilevskis et al. 2012). Hospital-at-Home (HaH) interventions provide acute care treatments of a predetermined duration in the patient's home as an alternative to traditional hospital care. These interventions could shorten a hospital stay by enabling an early discharge or even becoming a complete substitution for hospital care. This would allow for continuity of acute care at home over a proscribed period of time (Gonçalves-Bradley et al. 2017; Shepperd et al. 2016; Shepperd and Iliffe 1998). HaH interventions were developed to minimise, or even avoid, the potential iatrogenic effects of hospitalisation, improve patient and caregiver satisfaction, and reduce healthcare costs (Leong, Lim, and Lai 2021). There is growing evidence from systematic reviews demonstrating the effectiveness of HaH interventions on patient outcomes with lower mortality, reduced readmissions and lengths of stay, lower risk of long-term care admission, lower depression and anxiety reduced costs, and improved patient satisfaction (Arsenault-Lapierre et al. 2021; Caplan et al. 2012; Conley et al. 2016; Leong, Lim, and Lai 2021). Patients with chronic diseases who presented to emergency departments and then received HaH interventions had lower risks of readmission and long-term admission. They also showed lower rates of depression and anxiety than patients who had received inpatient care (Arsenault-Lapierre et al. 2021). Moreover, a meta-analysis and a scoping review showed that patients and caregivers had positive perceptions and experiences with HaH services (Chua et al. 2022; Wang, Stewart, and Lee 2024).
Older people with chronic conditions are prone to multiple specialist follow-ups, thereby generating significant care fragmentation (Le Couteur, Flicker, and Hilmer 2022; Sadler et al. 2023). Care fragmentation leads to adverse health outcomes and undermines patient's care experiences (Duan-Porter et al. 2020), and contributes also to risks of medication errors (Daunt, Curtin, and O'Mahony 2023; Squires et al. 2020). Deficiencies in prioritising patient-centred care and in the multidisciplinary continuity of care have, nevertheless, been identified (Wang, Stewart, and Lee 2024). In fact, the complex needs of an older people with multiple chronic conditions cannot be adequately addressed by a single healthcare professional; they require coordination and multidisciplinary collaboration (Araujo de Carvalho et al. 2017; Larsen, Broberger, and Petersson 2017). Thus, the World Health Organization recommends implementing integrated care models that ensure the continuity of care for older people with chronic conditions and minimise the fragmentation of care (World Health Organization 2017). Care coordination supported by nurses in an integrated healthcare model is effective for older people (Prajankett and Markaki 2021). Nurse-led intervention models demonstrated improved patient outcomes in terms of care coordination (Gabbard et al. 2021; McParland, Johnston, and Cooper 2022), primary and secondary prevention and management of chronic diseases (Beks et al. 2023), hospital admissions (Imhof et al. 2012), emergency room visits (Counsell et al. 2007), mortality (Dorr et al. 2008), physical functioning, nutritional status and quality of life (Kasa et al. 2023).
Although recent decades have seen considerable scientific research on providing HaH interventions for older people with chronic conditions, there has been comparatively little investigation of those interventions specifically led by nurses. A literature and bibliometric search examining published articles in Medline Ovid SP up to February 21, 2024, using the search string in Appendix, comparing published studies involving HaH interventions in general and nurse-led interventions in HaH for older adults with chronic conditions showed a lack of published research on the impact of nurse-led interventions models in HaH (Figure 1).
It is important that future nursing research should focus on highlighting the role and impact of nurse-led interventions in HaH on the outcomes of older people and caregivers but also on health systems. Moreover, the effectiveness of nurse-led models in this domain requires rigorous evaluation through retrospective, prospective and interventional studies. This will enhance our understanding and increase our knowledge of HaH care options that can be proposed to older people with chronic conditions. It will also give policymakers and healthcare institutions arguments for expanding efficient, home-based, person-centred care for this population.
R.A. contributed to the design, data analysis and writing the article. P.D., H.V. and P.L. supervised, corrected and contributed to the editing of this article.
患有慢性疾病的老年人住院与院内感染、谵妄、跌倒、功能衰退甚至早期死亡的高风险相关(Richardson 2006;Sharek et al. 2011;sheppard et al. 2017;Sprivulis等人,2006;Vasilevskis et al. 2012)。居家医院(HaH)干预措施在患者家中提供预定持续时间的急性护理治疗,作为传统医院护理的替代方案。这些干预措施可以缩短住院时间,使患者能够早日出院,甚至可以完全替代医院护理。这将允许在规定的时间内继续在家中进行急性护理(gon<s:1> alves- bradley等人,2017;sheppard et al. 2016;谢泼德和伊利夫1998)。开发HaH干预措施是为了尽量减少甚至避免住院的潜在医源性影响,提高患者和护理人员的满意度,并降低医疗保健成本(Leong, Lim, and Lai 2021)。越来越多来自系统评价的证据表明,HaH干预措施在降低患者死亡率、减少再入院率和住院时间、降低长期护理入院风险、降低抑郁和焦虑、降低成本和提高患者满意度方面的有效性(Arsenault-Lapierre等人,2021;Caplan et al. 2012;Conley et al. 2016;Leong, Lim, and Lai 2021)。慢性病患者在急诊科就诊后接受HaH干预的再入院和长期住院的风险较低。与接受住院治疗的患者相比,他们的抑郁和焦虑率也较低(Arsenault-Lapierre et al. 2021)。此外,一项荟萃分析和范围评估显示,患者和护理人员对健康护理服务有积极的看法和体验(Chua et al. 2022;Wang, Stewart, and Lee 2024)。患有慢性疾病的老年人容易接受多次专科随访,从而产生严重的护理碎片化(Le Couteur, Flicker和Hilmer 2022;Sadler et al. 2023)。护理碎片化会导致不良的健康结果,破坏患者的护理体验(Duan-Porter et al. 2020),也会增加用药错误的风险(Daunt, Curtin, and O'Mahony 2023;Squires et al. 2020)。然而,在优先考虑以患者为中心的护理和护理的多学科连续性方面存在缺陷(Wang, Stewart, and Lee 2024)。事实上,患有多种慢性疾病的老年人的复杂需求无法由一名卫生保健专业人员充分解决;它们需要协调和多学科合作(Araujo de Carvalho et al. 2017;Larsen, Broberger, and Petersson 2017)。因此,世界卫生组织建议实施综合护理模式,确保对患有慢性病的老年人的护理的连续性,并尽量减少护理的碎片化(世界卫生组织,2017年)。在综合医疗模式下,由护士支持的护理协调对老年人是有效的(Prajankett and Markaki 2021)。护士主导的干预模式在护理协调方面改善了患者的结果(Gabbard et al. 2021;McParland, Johnston, and Cooper, 2022)、慢性病的一级和二级预防和管理(Beks et al. 2023)、住院(Imhof et al. 2012)、急诊室就诊(Counsell et al. 2007)、死亡率(Dorr et al. 2008)、身体功能、营养状况和生活质量(Kasa et al. 2023)。尽管近几十年来已经有相当多的科学研究为患有慢性疾病的老年人提供HaH干预措施,但对护士专门领导的这些干预措施的调查相对较少。使用附录中的搜索字符串,对Medline Ovid SP上截至2024年2月21日发表的文章进行文献和文献计量学检索,比较已发表的研究,涉及一般的健康照护干预和护士主导的老年人慢性疾病健康照护干预,表明缺乏关于护士主导的健康照护干预模式对健康照护影响的已发表研究(图1)。重要的是,未来的护理研究应侧重于强调护士主导的健康照护干预对老年人和照护者的结果以及对卫生系统的作用和影响。此外,护士主导的模式在这一领域的有效性需要通过回顾性、前瞻性和干预性研究进行严格的评估。这将增强我们对可向患有慢性疾病的老年人提出的HaH护理方案的理解和知识。它还将为决策者和卫生保健机构提供理由,为这一人口扩大有效的、以家庭为基础的、以人为本的护理。参与了文章的设计、数据分析和撰写。p.d., H.V.和P.L.对本文的编辑进行了监督、更正和贡献。 作者声明无利益冲突。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.