Using machine learning to detect noncredible cognitive test performance.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
John-Christopher A Finley, Anthony D Robinson, Jason R Soble, Violeta J Rodriguez
{"title":"Using machine learning to detect noncredible cognitive test performance.","authors":"John-Christopher A Finley, Anthony D Robinson, Jason R Soble, Violeta J Rodriguez","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2440085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Advanced algorithmic methods may improve the assessment of performance validity during neuropsychological testing. This study investigated whether unsupervised machine learning (ML) could serve as one such method. <b>Method:</b> Participants were 359 adult outpatients who underwent a neuropsychological evaluation for various referral reasons. Data relating to participants' performance validity test scores, medical and psychiatric history, referral reason, litigation status, and disability status were examined in an unsupervised ML model. The model was programmed to synthesize the data into an unspecified number of clusters, which were then compared to predetermined ratings of whether patients had valid or invalid test performance. Ratings were established according to multiple empirical performance validity test scores. To further understand the model, we examined which data were most helpful in its clustering decision-making process. <b>Results:</b> Similar to the clinical determination of patients' performance on neuropsychological testing, the model identified a two-cluster profile consisting of valid and invalid data. The model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy (area under the curve of .92 [95% CI .88, .97]) when referenced against participants' predetermined validity status. Performance validity test scores were the most influential in the differentiation of clusters, but medical history, referral reason, and disability status were also contributory. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings serve as a proof of concept that unsupervised ML can accurately assess performance validity using various data obtained during a neuropsychological evaluation. The manner in which unsupervised ML evaluates such data may circumvent some of the limitations with traditional validity assessment approaches. Importantly, unsupervised ML is adaptable to emerging digital technologies within neuropsychology that can be used to further improve the assessment of performance validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2440085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Advanced algorithmic methods may improve the assessment of performance validity during neuropsychological testing. This study investigated whether unsupervised machine learning (ML) could serve as one such method. Method: Participants were 359 adult outpatients who underwent a neuropsychological evaluation for various referral reasons. Data relating to participants' performance validity test scores, medical and psychiatric history, referral reason, litigation status, and disability status were examined in an unsupervised ML model. The model was programmed to synthesize the data into an unspecified number of clusters, which were then compared to predetermined ratings of whether patients had valid or invalid test performance. Ratings were established according to multiple empirical performance validity test scores. To further understand the model, we examined which data were most helpful in its clustering decision-making process. Results: Similar to the clinical determination of patients' performance on neuropsychological testing, the model identified a two-cluster profile consisting of valid and invalid data. The model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy (area under the curve of .92 [95% CI .88, .97]) when referenced against participants' predetermined validity status. Performance validity test scores were the most influential in the differentiation of clusters, but medical history, referral reason, and disability status were also contributory. Conclusions: These findings serve as a proof of concept that unsupervised ML can accurately assess performance validity using various data obtained during a neuropsychological evaluation. The manner in which unsupervised ML evaluates such data may circumvent some of the limitations with traditional validity assessment approaches. Importantly, unsupervised ML is adaptable to emerging digital technologies within neuropsychology that can be used to further improve the assessment of performance validity.

利用机器学习检测不可信的认知测试成绩。
目的:采用先进的算法方法提高神经心理测试的效度评估。这项研究调查了无监督机器学习(ML)是否可以作为一种这样的方法。方法:参与者为359名因各种转诊原因接受神经心理学评估的成年门诊患者。在无监督ML模型中检查与参与者的表现效度测试分数、医疗和精神病史、转诊原因、诉讼状态和残疾状态有关的数据。该模型被编程为将数据综合到未指定数量的集群中,然后将这些集群与预先确定的患者是否具有有效或无效的测试表现的评级进行比较。根据多个实证绩效效度测试分数建立评分。为了进一步理解该模型,我们检查了哪些数据在其聚类决策过程中最有帮助。结果:与临床确定患者在神经心理测试中的表现类似,该模型确定了由有效和无效数据组成的两簇概况。当参照参与者的预定效度状态时,该模型显示出出色的预测准确性(曲线下面积为0.92 [95% CI .88, 0.97])。效能效度测验成绩对分类影响最大,但病史、转诊原因和残疾状况也有影响。结论:这些发现证明了一个概念,即无监督机器学习可以使用在神经心理学评估中获得的各种数据准确地评估性能有效性。无监督机器学习评估此类数据的方式可以绕过传统有效性评估方法的一些限制。重要的是,无监督机器学习适用于神经心理学中新兴的数字技术,可用于进一步提高性能有效性的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信