The Effect of Using a Standardized Questionnaire on Sexual History Documentation and Testing to Diagnose Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Among Men Who have Sex with Men with HIV.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Danielle deMontigny Avila, Brooke Rabe, Arunmozhi Aravagiri, Martin Joseph, James Ray M Lim, Maryam Naveed, Raina Rappel, Berna Villanueva, Maithili Khandekar, Atehkeng Zinkeng, Sarah Yates, Lori E Fantry
{"title":"The Effect of Using a Standardized Questionnaire on Sexual History Documentation and Testing to Diagnose Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Among Men Who have Sex with Men with HIV.","authors":"Danielle deMontigny Avila, Brooke Rabe, Arunmozhi Aravagiri, Martin Joseph, James Ray M Lim, Maryam Naveed, Raina Rappel, Berna Villanueva, Maithili Khandekar, Atehkeng Zinkeng, Sarah Yates, Lori E Fantry","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Background: Most Neisseria gonorrhoea (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in men who have sex with men (MSM) are diagnosed at extragenital sites. However, testing at these sites is often lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine if a standardized questionnaire administered by physicians and clinical assistants improves documentation of sex activity and increases extragenital testing and diagnoses of GC and CT among MSM.Methods: A standardized sexual history questionnaire was implemented on 11/1/2022. Electronic medical records of 664 MSM with HIV, including 1064 encounters, were reviewed to compare pre- and post- implementation sexual history documentation, adequacy of documentation, extragenital GC and CT testing, and GC and CT diagnoses. Analysis included Chi-square and exact tests and logistic regression adjusting for physician cluster effects.Results: The standardized questionnaire was used by 53.7% of physicians and 85.9% of coordinators. Documentation of whether sexual activity occurred increased from 79.3% [95%confidence interval (CI) 0.758- 0.828] in the pre-intervention pre-COVID-19 period to 95.2% (95% CI 0.925-0.970) in the post-intervention period with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI 2.7-8.8). Specific questions about anal and oral sex increased from 42.0% to 88.1% (p < 0.001) and 23.7% to 88.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. Anal and pharyngeal testing increased from 14.4% to 20.2% (p = 0.040) and 17.2% to 23.3% (p = 0.045), respectively.Conclusions: This study demonstrates that using a standardized questionnaire during clinical encounters can improve documentation of sexual activity and testing for GC and CT at extragenital sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Most Neisseria gonorrhoea (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in men who have sex with men (MSM) are diagnosed at extragenital sites. However, testing at these sites is often lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine if a standardized questionnaire administered by physicians and clinical assistants improves documentation of sex activity and increases extragenital testing and diagnoses of GC and CT among MSM.Methods: A standardized sexual history questionnaire was implemented on 11/1/2022. Electronic medical records of 664 MSM with HIV, including 1064 encounters, were reviewed to compare pre- and post- implementation sexual history documentation, adequacy of documentation, extragenital GC and CT testing, and GC and CT diagnoses. Analysis included Chi-square and exact tests and logistic regression adjusting for physician cluster effects.Results: The standardized questionnaire was used by 53.7% of physicians and 85.9% of coordinators. Documentation of whether sexual activity occurred increased from 79.3% [95%confidence interval (CI) 0.758- 0.828] in the pre-intervention pre-COVID-19 period to 95.2% (95% CI 0.925-0.970) in the post-intervention period with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI 2.7-8.8). Specific questions about anal and oral sex increased from 42.0% to 88.1% (p < 0.001) and 23.7% to 88.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. Anal and pharyngeal testing increased from 14.4% to 20.2% (p = 0.040) and 17.2% to 23.3% (p = 0.045), respectively.Conclusions: This study demonstrates that using a standardized questionnaire during clinical encounters can improve documentation of sexual activity and testing for GC and CT at extragenital sites.

使用标准化问卷对性史记录和检测诊断淋病和衣原体感染的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信