Marthe B L Mansour, Mathilde R Crone, Henk C van Weert, Niels H Chavannes, Kristel M van Asselt
{"title":"A Stop-Smoking Strategy After Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Dutch General Practice.","authors":"Marthe B L Mansour, Mathilde R Crone, Henk C van Weert, Niels H Chavannes, Kristel M van Asselt","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess whether brief stop-smoking advice given to women who smoke and visit their general practice for cervical cancer screening improves smoking cessation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>This two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 75 Dutch general practices. Participants in the intervention group received brief stop-smoking advice based on the Ask-Advise-Connect method, delivered by a practice assistant. Patient-reported outcomes were measured at 6 months: undertaking a serious quit attempt of at least 24 hours during follow-up (primary outcome), 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months, reduction in number of cigarettes smoked, increase in motivation to quit smoking, exposure to advice or support, and other psychological and behavioral measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in undertaking a serious quit attempt between the intervention (39.8% of n = 266) and control group (36.0% of n = 214), odds ratio 1.18 (95% confidence intervals: 0.80-1.72, p = .41). Neither did the point prevalence abstinence significantly differ between groups: 21.1% versus 16.3%, odds ratio 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-2.29, p = .21). Although nonsignificant, the direction of effects for the aforementioned outcomes was in favor of the intervention group. The reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked and increase in motivation to quit did not differ between groups. The uptake of cessation counseling was higher in the intervention (14.7%) than in the control group (2.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A brief stop-smoking strategy after the smear test for cervical screening might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting and seek cessation counseling, but a significant effect could not be demonstrated in this trial.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The results of this cluster-randomized trial suggest that brief advice to stop-smoking delivered by a practice assistant after routine cervical screening in general practice might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting, but a significant effect could not be proven. Also, women who receive advice show a higher uptake of professional cessation counseling compared to their controls. Providing brief advice after the cervical smear might therefore be a useful opportunistic approach to stimulate cessation in women who smoke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"805-814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether brief stop-smoking advice given to women who smoke and visit their general practice for cervical cancer screening improves smoking cessation outcomes.
Aims and methods: This two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 75 Dutch general practices. Participants in the intervention group received brief stop-smoking advice based on the Ask-Advise-Connect method, delivered by a practice assistant. Patient-reported outcomes were measured at 6 months: undertaking a serious quit attempt of at least 24 hours during follow-up (primary outcome), 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months, reduction in number of cigarettes smoked, increase in motivation to quit smoking, exposure to advice or support, and other psychological and behavioral measurements.
Results: There was no significant difference in undertaking a serious quit attempt between the intervention (39.8% of n = 266) and control group (36.0% of n = 214), odds ratio 1.18 (95% confidence intervals: 0.80-1.72, p = .41). Neither did the point prevalence abstinence significantly differ between groups: 21.1% versus 16.3%, odds ratio 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-2.29, p = .21). Although nonsignificant, the direction of effects for the aforementioned outcomes was in favor of the intervention group. The reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked and increase in motivation to quit did not differ between groups. The uptake of cessation counseling was higher in the intervention (14.7%) than in the control group (2.8%).
Conclusions: A brief stop-smoking strategy after the smear test for cervical screening might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting and seek cessation counseling, but a significant effect could not be demonstrated in this trial.
Implications: The results of this cluster-randomized trial suggest that brief advice to stop-smoking delivered by a practice assistant after routine cervical screening in general practice might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting, but a significant effect could not be proven. Also, women who receive advice show a higher uptake of professional cessation counseling compared to their controls. Providing brief advice after the cervical smear might therefore be a useful opportunistic approach to stimulate cessation in women who smoke.
期刊介绍:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco.
It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas.
Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.