Automating Racism: Is Use of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculator Associated with Inequity in Perinatal Service Delivery?

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicholas Rubashkin, Ifeyinwa V Asiodu, Saraswathi Vedam, Carolyn Sufrin, Miriam Kuppermann, Vincanne Adams
{"title":"Automating Racism: Is Use of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculator Associated with Inequity in Perinatal Service Delivery?","authors":"Nicholas Rubashkin, Ifeyinwa V Asiodu, Saraswathi Vedam, Carolyn Sufrin, Miriam Kuppermann, Vincanne Adams","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02233-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The clinical application of race-adjusted algorithms may perpetuate health inequities. We assessed the impact of the vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator, which was revised in 2021 to address concerns about equity. The original algorithm factored race and ethnicity and gave lower VBAC probabilities to Black and Hispanic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2019 to 2020, we conducted a multi-site, ethnographic study consisting of interviews and audio recordings of 14 prenatal visits. We used grounded theory to describe the social processes of racialization.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Across 4 sites, 12 obstetricians, 5 midwives, and 31 pregnant/postpartum patients participated. Seventy-four percent (N = 23) of the pregnant/postpartum individuals identified as racially minoritized, and the remaining 24% (N = 8) identified as White. We identified four processes that facilitated the \"automation\" of racism: adhering to strict cutoffs; the routine adoption of calculators; obfuscating the calculator; and the reflexive categorization of race and ethnicity. When clinicians adhered to strict cutoffs, they steered low-scoring Black and Hispanic patients toward repeat cesareans. If clinicians obfuscated the calculator, Black and Hispanic patients had to work to decode the role of race and ethnicity in their probabilities in order to pursue a VBAC. By reflexively categorizing race and ethnicity, the use of the calculator forced patients to choose a singular identity, even if it obscured the truth about their multi-faceted race or ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VBAC calculator's inclusion of race and ethnicity helped to automate racism by coding race into institutional practices and care interactions. This resulted in some clinicians discouraging or prohibiting Black and Hispanic patients from attempting a VBAC.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>To date, no empiric study has examined whether the VBAC calculator produced inequities in access to VBAC services and reproduced racism in care. The VBAC calculator resulted in fewer VBAC attempts among racially minoritized patients, denying them the opportunity to undergo labor and a vaginal birthing experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02233-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The clinical application of race-adjusted algorithms may perpetuate health inequities. We assessed the impact of the vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator, which was revised in 2021 to address concerns about equity. The original algorithm factored race and ethnicity and gave lower VBAC probabilities to Black and Hispanic patients.

Methods: From 2019 to 2020, we conducted a multi-site, ethnographic study consisting of interviews and audio recordings of 14 prenatal visits. We used grounded theory to describe the social processes of racialization.

Findings: Across 4 sites, 12 obstetricians, 5 midwives, and 31 pregnant/postpartum patients participated. Seventy-four percent (N = 23) of the pregnant/postpartum individuals identified as racially minoritized, and the remaining 24% (N = 8) identified as White. We identified four processes that facilitated the "automation" of racism: adhering to strict cutoffs; the routine adoption of calculators; obfuscating the calculator; and the reflexive categorization of race and ethnicity. When clinicians adhered to strict cutoffs, they steered low-scoring Black and Hispanic patients toward repeat cesareans. If clinicians obfuscated the calculator, Black and Hispanic patients had to work to decode the role of race and ethnicity in their probabilities in order to pursue a VBAC. By reflexively categorizing race and ethnicity, the use of the calculator forced patients to choose a singular identity, even if it obscured the truth about their multi-faceted race or ethnicity.

Conclusion: The VBAC calculator's inclusion of race and ethnicity helped to automate racism by coding race into institutional practices and care interactions. This resulted in some clinicians discouraging or prohibiting Black and Hispanic patients from attempting a VBAC.

Significance: To date, no empiric study has examined whether the VBAC calculator produced inequities in access to VBAC services and reproduced racism in care. The VBAC calculator resulted in fewer VBAC attempts among racially minoritized patients, denying them the opportunity to undergo labor and a vaginal birthing experience.

自动化种族主义:使用剖宫产后阴道分娩计算器与围产期服务提供的不公平有关吗?
目的:种族调整算法的临床应用可能使卫生不公平永久化。我们评估了剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)计算器的影响,该计算器于2021年进行了修订,以解决对公平的担忧。原始算法考虑了种族和民族因素,并给出了黑人和西班牙裔患者较低的VBAC概率。方法:从2019年到2020年,我们进行了一项多地点的民族志研究,包括14次产前访问的访谈和录音。我们用扎根理论来描述种族化的社会过程。结果:在4个站点,12名产科医生,5名助产士和31名孕妇/产后患者参与。74% (N = 23)的孕妇/产后个体被确定为少数种族,其余24% (N = 8)被确定为白人。我们确定了促进种族主义“自动化”的四个过程:坚持严格的界限;计算器的日常使用;混淆计算器;以及种族和民族的反身性分类。当临床医生坚持严格的限制时,他们会引导得分低的黑人和西班牙裔患者重复剖腹产。如果临床医生混淆了计算器,黑人和西班牙裔患者必须努力解码种族和民族在他们的概率中的作用,以便追求VBAC。通过反射性地对种族和民族进行分类,使用计算器迫使患者选择一个单一的身份,即使它掩盖了他们多方面的种族或民族的真相。结论:VBAC计算器包含种族和民族,通过将种族编码到机构实践和护理互动中,有助于使种族主义自动化。这导致一些临床医生不鼓励或禁止黑人和西班牙裔患者尝试VBAC。意义:迄今为止,没有实证研究检验VBAC计算器是否在获得VBAC服务方面产生了不平等,并在护理中再现了种族主义。VBAC计算器导致少数族裔患者的VBAC尝试减少,剥夺了他们接受分娩和阴道分娩体验的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信