Ngu Wah Than, D Mark Pritchard, David M Hughes, Carrie A Duckworth, Helen Wong, Muneeb Ul Haq, Rajaram Sripadam, Arthur Sun Myint
{"title":"Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) as a boost therapy after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer.","authors":"Ngu Wah Than, D Mark Pritchard, David M Hughes, Carrie A Duckworth, Helen Wong, Muneeb Ul Haq, Rajaram Sripadam, Arthur Sun Myint","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Radical surgery following neoadjuvant therapy is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. A Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) boost can alternatively be used to treat residual disease post neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation, especially in patients who are not suitable for or do not wish to have surgery. Its role has mostly been studied to date in low to intermediate-risk patients. We have now evaluated the utility of CXB-boost in high-risk rectal cancers after their tumours have been significantly downstaged by neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Oncological outcomes and treatment tolerability were evaluated in 328 patients based on rectal cancer treatment risk stratification: low/intermediate risk (cT1-3ab, N0-1, M0, no extramural invasion (EMVI), mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement >1mm) and high-risk (cT3cd-4/N2, M0, MRF≤1mm and/or EMVI positive).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With median follow-up of 33(IQR:15-54) months and median age of 73(IQR:62-80) years, no significant differences were found between low/intermediate and high-risk groups in clinical complete response (78% vs 73%, p=0.32), local regrowth (16.6% vs 22.4%, p=0.41), nodal (1.8% vs 5.8%, p=0.051) or regional (1.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.33) relapse, or post-radiation toxicities (p=0.16). However, the high-risk group had a higher distant relapse rate (21.2% vs 10.7%, p=0.01), with no significant differences in 3-year organ preservation (80% vs 87%, p=0.25), 5-year disease-free (DFS) (62% vs 64%, p=0.46), or overall (OS) survivals (67% vs 64%, p=0.88). Longer treatment time, treatment gap >24 weeks between therapies, and administration of a higher than standard CXB dose were newly identified factors that negatively impacted outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-risk rectal cancer patients treated with CXB-boost had more distant relapses, but comparable locoregional tumour control, organ preservation, DFS and OS to lower-risk patients, with acceptable toxicities. CXB-boost is therefore a viable option for selected high-risk rectal cancer patients. Timely reassessment, prompt referral, and CXB dose optimisation are crucial for improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Radical surgery following neoadjuvant therapy is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. A Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) boost can alternatively be used to treat residual disease post neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation, especially in patients who are not suitable for or do not wish to have surgery. Its role has mostly been studied to date in low to intermediate-risk patients. We have now evaluated the utility of CXB-boost in high-risk rectal cancers after their tumours have been significantly downstaged by neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation.
Materials and methods: Oncological outcomes and treatment tolerability were evaluated in 328 patients based on rectal cancer treatment risk stratification: low/intermediate risk (cT1-3ab, N0-1, M0, no extramural invasion (EMVI), mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement >1mm) and high-risk (cT3cd-4/N2, M0, MRF≤1mm and/or EMVI positive).
Results: With median follow-up of 33(IQR:15-54) months and median age of 73(IQR:62-80) years, no significant differences were found between low/intermediate and high-risk groups in clinical complete response (78% vs 73%, p=0.32), local regrowth (16.6% vs 22.4%, p=0.41), nodal (1.8% vs 5.8%, p=0.051) or regional (1.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.33) relapse, or post-radiation toxicities (p=0.16). However, the high-risk group had a higher distant relapse rate (21.2% vs 10.7%, p=0.01), with no significant differences in 3-year organ preservation (80% vs 87%, p=0.25), 5-year disease-free (DFS) (62% vs 64%, p=0.46), or overall (OS) survivals (67% vs 64%, p=0.88). Longer treatment time, treatment gap >24 weeks between therapies, and administration of a higher than standard CXB dose were newly identified factors that negatively impacted outcomes.
Conclusions: High-risk rectal cancer patients treated with CXB-boost had more distant relapses, but comparable locoregional tumour control, organ preservation, DFS and OS to lower-risk patients, with acceptable toxicities. CXB-boost is therefore a viable option for selected high-risk rectal cancer patients. Timely reassessment, prompt referral, and CXB dose optimisation are crucial for improving outcomes.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.