Efficacy of caffeine as an ergogenic aid in multiple cycling time trials.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Ítalo Vinícius, Cayque Brietzke, Paulo Franco-Alvarenga, Gustavo Vasconcelos, Bryan Saunders, Tony Meireles Santos, Flávio Oliveira Pires
{"title":"Efficacy of caffeine as an ergogenic aid in multiple cycling time trials.","authors":"Ítalo Vinícius, Cayque Brietzke, Paulo Franco-Alvarenga, Gustavo Vasconcelos, Bryan Saunders, Tony Meireles Santos, Flávio Oliveira Pires","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05680-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence that caffeine supplementation is effective to improve performance in cycling time trials has been obtained in single rather than multiple time trials. We investigated whether 5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of caffeine enhanced performance in multiple 4 km cycling time trials (TT4km) conducted within the same day and across different days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After selection of eligible cyclists and familiarization with the TT4km, thirteen well-trained cyclists participated in a balanced placebo-controlled designed with two caffeine sessions (CAF-1 and CAF-2) and a placebo session. In each session, cyclists performed a baseline TT4km before caffeine, and two supplemented TT4km (50 min and 80 min after supplementation). Relative and absolute reliability were obtained through intraclass coefficient correlation and standard error of the measurement (SEM), respectively. The cyclists' performance responses to caffeine were classified as beneficial, unchanged, and adverse by calculating the change between caffeine and placebo relative to SEM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caffeine enhanced performance in the first supplemented TT4km in CAF-1 and CAF-2 (0.5% and 1.8%, respectively), although only CAF-2 was significantly different from placebo (p < 0.001). Analysis with grouped data showed good absolute and relative reliability of caffeine effects within and across days. However, analysis of individual data showed that 38% and 31% of the cyclists changed their classification of responsiveness to caffeine between the supplemented trials across days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the good reliability of caffeine to enhance performance in a single TT4km performed within and across days, individual analysis challenged the use of caffeine supplementation protocols based on grouped data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05680-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence that caffeine supplementation is effective to improve performance in cycling time trials has been obtained in single rather than multiple time trials. We investigated whether 5 mg.kg-1 of caffeine enhanced performance in multiple 4 km cycling time trials (TT4km) conducted within the same day and across different days.

Methods: After selection of eligible cyclists and familiarization with the TT4km, thirteen well-trained cyclists participated in a balanced placebo-controlled designed with two caffeine sessions (CAF-1 and CAF-2) and a placebo session. In each session, cyclists performed a baseline TT4km before caffeine, and two supplemented TT4km (50 min and 80 min after supplementation). Relative and absolute reliability were obtained through intraclass coefficient correlation and standard error of the measurement (SEM), respectively. The cyclists' performance responses to caffeine were classified as beneficial, unchanged, and adverse by calculating the change between caffeine and placebo relative to SEM.

Results: Caffeine enhanced performance in the first supplemented TT4km in CAF-1 and CAF-2 (0.5% and 1.8%, respectively), although only CAF-2 was significantly different from placebo (p < 0.001). Analysis with grouped data showed good absolute and relative reliability of caffeine effects within and across days. However, analysis of individual data showed that 38% and 31% of the cyclists changed their classification of responsiveness to caffeine between the supplemented trials across days.

Conclusions: Despite the good reliability of caffeine to enhance performance in a single TT4km performed within and across days, individual analysis challenged the use of caffeine supplementation protocols based on grouped data.

咖啡因在多次自行车计时赛中作为助力的功效。
导言:补充咖啡因可有效提高自行车计时赛成绩的证据是在单次而非多次计时赛中获得的。我们研究了在同一天和不同天进行的多次 4 公里自行车计时赛(TT4km)中,5 毫克/千克咖啡因是否能提高成绩:在挑选出符合条件的自行车运动员并熟悉 TT4km 后,13 名训练有素的自行车运动员参加了平衡安慰剂对照设计,其中包括两个咖啡因时段(CAF-1 和 CAF-2)和一个安慰剂时段。在每个环节中,自行车运动员在咖啡因之前进行一次基线 TT4km,然后进行两次补充 TT4km(补充后 50 分钟和 80 分钟)。相对可靠性和绝对可靠性分别通过类内系数相关性和测量标准误差(SEM)获得。通过计算咖啡因与安慰剂之间相对于 SEM 的变化,将自行车运动员对咖啡因的表现反应分为有益、无变化和不利:在 CAF-1 和 CAF-2 中,咖啡因提高了第一次补充 TT4km 的成绩(分别为 0.5% 和 1.8%),但只有 CAF-2 与安慰剂有显著差异(p 结论:尽管咖啡因的可靠性较好,但在第一次补充 TT4km 中,咖啡因提高了成绩:尽管咖啡因在单次 TT4 公里跑中提高成绩的可靠性很高,但个体分析对基于分组数据的咖啡因补充方案的使用提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信