Obstacles for marginalized group members in obtaining leadership positions: Threats and opportunities

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Astrid C. Homan, Yasmin Abbaszadeh
{"title":"Obstacles for marginalized group members in obtaining leadership positions: Threats and opportunities","authors":"Astrid C. Homan,&nbsp;Yasmin Abbaszadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rising to higher hierarchical positions is a struggle for those who do not fit the stereotypical leadership mold. Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs) associate leadership with dominant groups (e.g., white, male), which limits opportunities of non-prototypical individuals (e.g., women, ethnic minorities) to claim or be granted leadership roles. We first review evidence of the barriers members of non-prototypical groups encounter in leadership advancement, and subsequently explore theoretical mechanisms explaining why these barriers persist. Finally, we advocate for a shift from bias awareness and affirmative action as potential solutions to an opportunity-threat approach that speaks directly to the cognitive nature of leadership categorization. We propose that by fostering an opportunity mindset—one that promotes open and flexible thinking—rather than a threat mindset—defined by rigidity and narrowmindedness—the traditional ‘leader’ profile can be broadened and made more inclusive and as such will stimulate leadership claiming by and granting to non-prototypical individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101971"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24001842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising to higher hierarchical positions is a struggle for those who do not fit the stereotypical leadership mold. Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs) associate leadership with dominant groups (e.g., white, male), which limits opportunities of non-prototypical individuals (e.g., women, ethnic minorities) to claim or be granted leadership roles. We first review evidence of the barriers members of non-prototypical groups encounter in leadership advancement, and subsequently explore theoretical mechanisms explaining why these barriers persist. Finally, we advocate for a shift from bias awareness and affirmative action as potential solutions to an opportunity-threat approach that speaks directly to the cognitive nature of leadership categorization. We propose that by fostering an opportunity mindset—one that promotes open and flexible thinking—rather than a threat mindset—defined by rigidity and narrowmindedness—the traditional ‘leader’ profile can be broadened and made more inclusive and as such will stimulate leadership claiming by and granting to non-prototypical individuals.
边缘化群体成员获得领导职位的障碍:威胁与机遇
对于那些不符合传统领导模式的人来说,晋升到更高的职位是一场斗争。内隐领导理论(ILTs)将领导与优势群体(如白人、男性)联系在一起,这限制了非原型个体(如女性、少数民族)要求或被授予领导角色的机会。我们首先回顾了非原型群体成员在领导晋升中遇到障碍的证据,随后探讨了解释这些障碍持续存在的理论机制。最后,我们主张从偏见意识和平权行动作为潜在的解决方案转变为机会-威胁方法,直接谈到领导力分类的认知本质。我们建议,通过培养一种机会心态——一种促进开放和灵活思维的心态——而不是一种由僵化和狭隘所定义的威胁心态——传统的“领导者”形象可以被拓宽,变得更具包容性,这样就会刺激非原型个体的领导要求和授予。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信