{"title":"Obstacles for marginalized group members in obtaining leadership positions: Threats and opportunities","authors":"Astrid C. Homan, Yasmin Abbaszadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rising to higher hierarchical positions is a struggle for those who do not fit the stereotypical leadership mold. Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs) associate leadership with dominant groups (e.g., white, male), which limits opportunities of non-prototypical individuals (e.g., women, ethnic minorities) to claim or be granted leadership roles. We first review evidence of the barriers members of non-prototypical groups encounter in leadership advancement, and subsequently explore theoretical mechanisms explaining why these barriers persist. Finally, we advocate for a shift from bias awareness and affirmative action as potential solutions to an opportunity-threat approach that speaks directly to the cognitive nature of leadership categorization. We propose that by fostering an opportunity mindset—one that promotes open and flexible thinking—rather than a threat mindset—defined by rigidity and narrowmindedness—the traditional ‘leader’ profile can be broadened and made more inclusive and as such will stimulate leadership claiming by and granting to non-prototypical individuals.","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rising to higher hierarchical positions is a struggle for those who do not fit the stereotypical leadership mold. Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs) associate leadership with dominant groups (e.g., white, male), which limits opportunities of non-prototypical individuals (e.g., women, ethnic minorities) to claim or be granted leadership roles. We first review evidence of the barriers members of non-prototypical groups encounter in leadership advancement, and subsequently explore theoretical mechanisms explaining why these barriers persist. Finally, we advocate for a shift from bias awareness and affirmative action as potential solutions to an opportunity-threat approach that speaks directly to the cognitive nature of leadership categorization. We propose that by fostering an opportunity mindset—one that promotes open and flexible thinking—rather than a threat mindset—defined by rigidity and narrowmindedness—the traditional ‘leader’ profile can be broadened and made more inclusive and as such will stimulate leadership claiming by and granting to non-prototypical individuals.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology