Insights into voluntary plasma donation: A study of motivators and obstacles.

Seyyede Fatemeh Shams, Mahtab Maghsudlu, Sedigheh Amini-Kafiabad, Amir Masoud Nazemi, Zohre Massaeli, Hayedeh Javadzadeh Shahshani, Leila Kasraian
{"title":"Insights into voluntary plasma donation: A study of motivators and obstacles.","authors":"Seyyede Fatemeh Shams, Mahtab Maghsudlu, Sedigheh Amini-Kafiabad, Amir Masoud Nazemi, Zohre Massaeli, Hayedeh Javadzadeh Shahshani, Leila Kasraian","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma-derived medicines (PDMs) are essential for treating various disorders and require large volumes of human plasma. The debate on voluntary and compensated plasma donation continues, while WHO advocating for voluntary donations. This study examines factors influencing plasma donation, focusing on the effectiveness of voluntary donation and identifying key motivators and barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This study was conducted in four blood centers. Two questionnaires were developed. The motivation questionnaire was administered to donors who had contributed plasma four times or more. The barrier questionnaire was distributed to donors who had donated only once. Chi-Square was used to compare variables and t-tests for means.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of participants, 245 frequent plasma donors completed the motivation questionnaire, and 664 one-time donors filled out the barrier survey. Altruism motivated frequent donors, while barriers included time constraints, preference for blood donation, and lack of awareness. Among frequent donors, 84.00% [CI 95%: 0.79-0.89] were willing to donate plasma or had no preference between donating plasma or blood, compared to 39.90% [CI 95%: 0.36-0.43] of one-time donors. Tendency to donate among one-time donors increased to 68.70% [CI 95%: 0.65-0.71], 93.40% [CI 95%: 0.91-0.95], and 43.50% [CI 95%: 0.40-0.47], when requested, friends needed PDMs, or compensation was offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased tendencies for plasma donation were reported when donors were directly approached by blood centers and friends required PDMs. Results challenge significance of monetary incentives in motivation of plasma donors, suggesting that fostering an understanding of crucial role of plasma donation proves more influential in driving contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94255,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2024.12.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Plasma-derived medicines (PDMs) are essential for treating various disorders and require large volumes of human plasma. The debate on voluntary and compensated plasma donation continues, while WHO advocating for voluntary donations. This study examines factors influencing plasma donation, focusing on the effectiveness of voluntary donation and identifying key motivators and barriers.

Methods and materials: This study was conducted in four blood centers. Two questionnaires were developed. The motivation questionnaire was administered to donors who had contributed plasma four times or more. The barrier questionnaire was distributed to donors who had donated only once. Chi-Square was used to compare variables and t-tests for means.

Results: Of participants, 245 frequent plasma donors completed the motivation questionnaire, and 664 one-time donors filled out the barrier survey. Altruism motivated frequent donors, while barriers included time constraints, preference for blood donation, and lack of awareness. Among frequent donors, 84.00% [CI 95%: 0.79-0.89] were willing to donate plasma or had no preference between donating plasma or blood, compared to 39.90% [CI 95%: 0.36-0.43] of one-time donors. Tendency to donate among one-time donors increased to 68.70% [CI 95%: 0.65-0.71], 93.40% [CI 95%: 0.91-0.95], and 43.50% [CI 95%: 0.40-0.47], when requested, friends needed PDMs, or compensation was offered.

Conclusions: Increased tendencies for plasma donation were reported when donors were directly approached by blood centers and friends required PDMs. Results challenge significance of monetary incentives in motivation of plasma donors, suggesting that fostering an understanding of crucial role of plasma donation proves more influential in driving contributions.

自愿捐献血浆的启示:动机和障碍研究。
背景:血浆源性药物(pdm)对于治疗各种疾病至关重要,需要大量的人血浆。关于自愿和有偿献血血浆的辩论仍在继续,而世卫组织则倡导自愿献血。本研究考察了影响血浆捐献的因素,重点关注自愿捐献的有效性,并确定了关键的激励因素和障碍。方法和材料:本研究在四个血液中心进行。编制了两份调查问卷。捐献血浆4次或4次以上的献血者参与了动机问卷调查。障碍调查表分发给只捐过一次血的捐献者。用卡方比较变量,用t检验均值。结果:在参与者中,245名频繁献血者完成了动机问卷,664名一次性献血者填写了障碍调查。利他主义激励了频繁的献血者,而障碍包括时间限制、献血偏好和缺乏意识。在频繁献血者中,84.00% [CI 95%: 0.79 ~ 0.89]愿意捐血浆或在捐血浆和献血之间没有选择,而在一次性献血者中,这一比例为39.90% [CI 95%: 0.36 ~ 0.43]。一次性捐献人的捐赠倾向增加到68.70% [CI 95%: 0.65-0.71], 93.40% [CI 95%: 0.91-0.95]和43.50% [CI 95%: 0.40-0.47],当朋友请求时,需要pdm或提供补偿。结论:当献血者被血液中心和需要pdm的朋友直接接触时,血浆捐献倾向增加。研究结果挑战了金钱激励对献血动机的重要性,表明培养对献血关键作用的理解在推动献血方面更有影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信