Hazard perception performance and psychological factors of distracted drivers: what are the associations?

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Christopher N Watling, Grégoire S Larue
{"title":"Hazard perception performance and psychological factors of distracted drivers: what are the associations?","authors":"Christopher N Watling, Grégoire S Larue","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2437814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Distracted driving is a major contributor to crashes involving younger drivers. A considerable amount of evidence emphasizes the link between driver distraction, poorer driving performance and increased crash risk. However, limited research has examined the effects of mobile phone use on hazard perception performance, especially younger drivers. The focus of the current study was to determine the hazard perception decrements associated with performing a low-order secondary task with a mobile phone and to determine what psychological factors were associated with hazard perception performance decrements in younger drivers (aged 20-25 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 74 participants (men: 40, women: 34) who had an open driver license and were, on average, aged 22.89 (<i>SD</i> = 1.83) completed two hazard perception sessions (control and dual task). The dual task condition entailed participants completing the hazard perception task while concurrently performing a low-order visual distraction task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clear decrements in hazard perception (longer reaction times and more missed hazards) were observed when performing the low-order secondary task when compared to completing the hazard perception test without the distraction task. In addition, higher levels of self-reported problematic mobile phone use and perceiving multitasking while driving as easy were associated with larger hazard perception performance decrements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest drivers misperceive their ability to divide their attention when driving and their actual hazard perception performance which likely facilitates distracted driving. The current study adds to the extant empirical studies emphasizing the link between driver distraction and poorer driving performance, in this case, decrements in hazard perception performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2437814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Distracted driving is a major contributor to crashes involving younger drivers. A considerable amount of evidence emphasizes the link between driver distraction, poorer driving performance and increased crash risk. However, limited research has examined the effects of mobile phone use on hazard perception performance, especially younger drivers. The focus of the current study was to determine the hazard perception decrements associated with performing a low-order secondary task with a mobile phone and to determine what psychological factors were associated with hazard perception performance decrements in younger drivers (aged 20-25 years).

Methods: In total, 74 participants (men: 40, women: 34) who had an open driver license and were, on average, aged 22.89 (SD = 1.83) completed two hazard perception sessions (control and dual task). The dual task condition entailed participants completing the hazard perception task while concurrently performing a low-order visual distraction task.

Results: Clear decrements in hazard perception (longer reaction times and more missed hazards) were observed when performing the low-order secondary task when compared to completing the hazard perception test without the distraction task. In addition, higher levels of self-reported problematic mobile phone use and perceiving multitasking while driving as easy were associated with larger hazard perception performance decrements.

Conclusions: The findings suggest drivers misperceive their ability to divide their attention when driving and their actual hazard perception performance which likely facilitates distracted driving. The current study adds to the extant empirical studies emphasizing the link between driver distraction and poorer driving performance, in this case, decrements in hazard perception performance.

危险感知表现与分心司机心理因素:有何关联?
目的:分心驾驶是年轻司机撞车的主要原因。相当多的证据强调了驾驶员注意力分散、驾驶性能下降和撞车风险增加之间的联系。然而,有限的研究调查了手机使用对危险感知表现的影响,特别是年轻司机。当前研究的重点是确定与使用手机执行低阶次要任务相关的危险感知能力下降,并确定哪些心理因素与年轻司机(20-25岁)的危险感知能力下降有关。方法:74名持有开放式驾驶执照的参与者(男40人,女34人),平均年龄22.89岁(SD = 1.83),完成了两个危险感知会话(对照和双重任务)。双重任务条件要求参与者完成危险感知任务,同时执行低阶视觉分散任务。结果:与没有分心任务的危险感知测试相比,在执行低阶次要任务时,观察到危险感知明显下降(反应时间更长,错过的危险更多)。此外,高水平的自我报告有问题的手机使用和开车时认为容易多任务处理与更大的危险感知能力下降有关。结论:研究结果表明,司机误解了他们在驾驶时分散注意力的能力和他们实际的危险感知表现,这可能会导致分心驾驶。目前的研究增加了现有的实证研究,强调司机分心和较差的驾驶表现之间的联系,在这种情况下,危险感知表现的下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信