Hidden size: Size representations in implicitly coded objects.

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Cognition Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106041
Elif Memis, Gizem Y Yildiz, Gereon R Fink, Ralph Weidner
{"title":"Hidden size: Size representations in implicitly coded objects.","authors":"Elif Memis, Gizem Y Yildiz, Gereon R Fink, Ralph Weidner","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Its angular representation on the retina does not solely determine the perceived size of an object. Instead, contextual information is interpreted. We investigated the levels of processing at which this interpretation occurs. Combining three experimental paradigms, we explored whether masked and more implicitly coded objects are already size-rescaled. We induced object size rescaling using a modified variant of the Ebbinghaus illusion. In this variant, six dots altered the size of a central stimulus and served as inducers generating Object-Substitution Masking (OSM). Participants reported the average size of multiple circles using the size-averaging paradigm, allowing us to test the contribution of masked and non-masked central target circles. Our Ebbinghaus illusion variant altered perceived stimulus size and showed robust masking via OSM. Furthermore, size-averaging was sensitive enough to detect perceived size changes in the magnitude of the ones induced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. Finally, combining all three paradigms, we observed that masked and non-masked stimuli contributed to size averaging in a size-rescaled manner. In a control experiment testing the general effects of Ebbinghaus inducers, we observed a contrast-like effect on size averaging. Large inducers decreased the perceived average size, while small inducers increased it. In summary, our experiments indicate that context integration, induced by the Ebbinghaus illusion, alters size representations at an early stage. These modified size representations are independent of whether a target is recognisable. Moreover, perceived average size appears to be coded relative to surrounding perceptual groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"256 ","pages":"106041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Its angular representation on the retina does not solely determine the perceived size of an object. Instead, contextual information is interpreted. We investigated the levels of processing at which this interpretation occurs. Combining three experimental paradigms, we explored whether masked and more implicitly coded objects are already size-rescaled. We induced object size rescaling using a modified variant of the Ebbinghaus illusion. In this variant, six dots altered the size of a central stimulus and served as inducers generating Object-Substitution Masking (OSM). Participants reported the average size of multiple circles using the size-averaging paradigm, allowing us to test the contribution of masked and non-masked central target circles. Our Ebbinghaus illusion variant altered perceived stimulus size and showed robust masking via OSM. Furthermore, size-averaging was sensitive enough to detect perceived size changes in the magnitude of the ones induced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. Finally, combining all three paradigms, we observed that masked and non-masked stimuli contributed to size averaging in a size-rescaled manner. In a control experiment testing the general effects of Ebbinghaus inducers, we observed a contrast-like effect on size averaging. Large inducers decreased the perceived average size, while small inducers increased it. In summary, our experiments indicate that context integration, induced by the Ebbinghaus illusion, alters size representations at an early stage. These modified size representations are independent of whether a target is recognisable. Moreover, perceived average size appears to be coded relative to surrounding perceptual groups.

隐藏的尺寸:隐含编码对象中的尺寸表示。
它在视网膜上的角度表现并不仅仅决定物体的感知大小。相反,上下文信息被解释。我们研究了发生这种解释的处理水平。结合三个实验范例,我们探讨了遮罩和更隐式编码的对象是否已经大小缩放。我们使用艾宾浩斯错觉的一种改进变体诱导物体大小重新缩放。在这种变体中,6个点改变了中心刺激的大小,并作为诱发物产生对象替代掩蔽(OSM)。参与者报告了使用大小平均范式的多个圆的平均大小,允许我们测试蒙面和非蒙面中心目标圆的贡献。我们的艾宾浩斯错觉变体改变了感知刺激的大小,并通过OSM显示出强大的掩蔽。此外,尺寸平均足够敏感,可以检测到由艾宾浩斯错觉引起的感知尺寸变化的幅度。最后,结合这三种范式,我们观察到掩蔽和非掩蔽刺激对尺寸平均的影响以尺寸重新缩放的方式进行。在测试艾宾浩斯诱导剂一般效果的对照实验中,我们观察到尺寸平均的对比效应。大型诱导剂降低了感知的平均尺寸,而小型诱导剂则增加了感知的平均尺寸。总之,我们的实验表明,由艾宾浩斯错觉引起的情境整合在早期阶段改变了尺寸表征。这些修改后的大小表示与目标是否可识别无关。此外,感知到的平均尺寸似乎是相对于周围的感知群体进行编码的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信