Improved costs and turnaround time for Treponema pallidum detection utilising a real-time PCR assay developed for the Hologic Panther Fusion system.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Radhika Nagappan, Erasmus Smit, Saed Miri Nargesi, Gary McAuliffe
{"title":"Improved costs and turnaround time for Treponema pallidum detection utilising a real-time PCR assay developed for the Hologic Panther Fusion system.","authors":"Radhika Nagappan, Erasmus Smit, Saed Miri Nargesi, Gary McAuliffe","doi":"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aims of this study were to evaluate the performance and workflow characteristics of a laboratory-developed test to detect Treponema pallidum on the Hologic Panther Fusion system compared with an existing commercial assay. A Hologic Panther Fusion-based real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was optimised for T. pallidum (TP RT-PCR) using previously published primer and probe sequences and validated with a simplified preprocessing protocol. A total of 124 clinical and external quality assurance (EQA) samples were tested in parallel by the new method and the Viasure T. pallidum RT-PCR (Certest Biotech). Cross reactivity, limit of detection, PCR efficiency and coefficient of variation (CV) were measured. Simplified preprocessing methods involving either concentration or vortexing were compared with the existing overnight chemical/enzymatic preprocessing method for a subset of positive samples. Workflow impacts were assessed before and after implementation. The Panther Fusion T. pallidum assay correctly detected 65 of 65 (100%) positive clinical and EQA samples and 33 of 33 (100%) negative samples. No cross reactivity was observed for 45 of 45 (100%) samples. The limit of detection was 15 copies/reaction, and intrarun CV was <1.66%. The simplest preprocessing protocol detected 34 of 34 (100%) positive samples with an average Δ cycle threshold (Ct) <0.82 compared with the Viasure workflow. The new workflow reduced median turnaround time from 3.83 to 1.73 days (p<0.001) and estimated costs from US$35,004.96 to US$19,390.15 in the 3 months post-implementation. The laboratory-developed Panther Fusion T. pallidum assay is a sensitive and specific method for detection of syphilis and a cost-effective option to help improve workflow and turnaround time in a diagnostic laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":19915,"journal":{"name":"Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2024.09.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the performance and workflow characteristics of a laboratory-developed test to detect Treponema pallidum on the Hologic Panther Fusion system compared with an existing commercial assay. A Hologic Panther Fusion-based real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was optimised for T. pallidum (TP RT-PCR) using previously published primer and probe sequences and validated with a simplified preprocessing protocol. A total of 124 clinical and external quality assurance (EQA) samples were tested in parallel by the new method and the Viasure T. pallidum RT-PCR (Certest Biotech). Cross reactivity, limit of detection, PCR efficiency and coefficient of variation (CV) were measured. Simplified preprocessing methods involving either concentration or vortexing were compared with the existing overnight chemical/enzymatic preprocessing method for a subset of positive samples. Workflow impacts were assessed before and after implementation. The Panther Fusion T. pallidum assay correctly detected 65 of 65 (100%) positive clinical and EQA samples and 33 of 33 (100%) negative samples. No cross reactivity was observed for 45 of 45 (100%) samples. The limit of detection was 15 copies/reaction, and intrarun CV was <1.66%. The simplest preprocessing protocol detected 34 of 34 (100%) positive samples with an average Δ cycle threshold (Ct) <0.82 compared with the Viasure workflow. The new workflow reduced median turnaround time from 3.83 to 1.73 days (p<0.001) and estimated costs from US$35,004.96 to US$19,390.15 in the 3 months post-implementation. The laboratory-developed Panther Fusion T. pallidum assay is a sensitive and specific method for detection of syphilis and a cost-effective option to help improve workflow and turnaround time in a diagnostic laboratory.

本研究的目的是评估实验室开发的检测方法的性能和工作流程特点,与现有的商业检测方法相比,该方法可在Hologic Panther Fusion系统上检测苍白螺旋体。利用以前公布的引物和探针序列对基于Hologic Panther Fusion的苍白螺旋体实时聚合酶链反应检测法(TP RT-PCR)进行了优化,并通过简化的预处理方案进行了验证。新方法与 Viasure T. pallidum RT-PCR (Certest Biotech)同时检测了 124 份临床样本和外部质量保证(EQA)样本。对交叉反应性、检测限、PCR效率和变异系数(CV)进行了测量。针对部分阳性样本,将涉及浓缩或涡旋的简化预处理方法与现有的隔夜化学/酶预处理方法进行了比较。对实施前后的工作流程影响进行了评估。在 65 份临床和 EQA 阳性样本中,Panther Fusion T. pallidum 检测法正确检测出 65 份(100%)阳性样本;在 33 份阴性样本中,Panther Fusion T. pallidum 检测法正确检测出 33 份(100%)阳性样本。45 份样本中有 45 份(100%)未发现交叉反应。检测限为 15 个拷贝/反应,内部 CV 为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathology
Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
459
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Published by Elsevier from 2016 Pathology is the official journal of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). It is committed to publishing peer-reviewed, original articles related to the science of pathology in its broadest sense, including anatomical pathology, chemical pathology and biochemistry, cytopathology, experimental pathology, forensic pathology and morbid anatomy, genetics, haematology, immunology and immunopathology, microbiology and molecular pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信