Real-Time Pain Control Education After Outpatient General Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
William G Lee, Farin F Amersi, Monica Jain, Scott A Cunneen, Miguel Burch, Edward Phillips, Yufei Chen
{"title":"Real-Time Pain Control Education After Outpatient General Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"William G Lee, Farin F Amersi, Monica Jain, Scott A Cunneen, Miguel Burch, Edward Phillips, Yufei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioid-related morbidity and mortality continue to rise with surgery often serving as the first exposure to opioids for patients. Few interventions focus on real-time education in the outpatient setting while patients are experiencing pain. The effect of short-messaging service (SMS) surveys with real-time opioid-use education (SMSE) and without (SMS) on outpatient postoperative opioid use was studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blinded randomized controlled trial enrolled adults (≥18 y) who underwent outpatient general surgery procedures from January 1, 2020, to January 2, 2021. Participants received an automated daily SMS or SMSE for 10 d postoperatively. Primary outcomes included total opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and total pain scores. Data were gathered via real-time SMS patient responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty patients were randomized to SMS (n = 82) or SMSE (n = 78). Patient demographic/clinical characteristics and surgery type were similar. Between SMS and SMSE, there were no differences in total pain scores (25 [interquartile range (IQR): 25.0] versus 31 [IQR: 35.7], P = 0.291) or total OME used (15.5 mg [IQR: 37.5] versus 15.8 mg [IQR: 45.6], P = 0.762). Increased total OME correlated with younger age (P = 0.001), opioids prescribed (P = 0.001), and preoperative opioid use (P = 0.018). Higher patient satisfaction was observed in patients with lower total pain scores and OME used, with no difference in opioids prescribed (P = 0.352). Subgroup analysis revealed open hernia repair patients in the SMSE group had lower OME used (0 mg [IQR: 0] versus 14.2 mg [IQR: 11.6], P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-time opioid-use education via SMS did not lead to a difference in opioid use, but demonstrated a high acceptance rate as a mode of communication and feedback. This finding should encourage further optimization of the SMS tool to rapidly identify patients with inadequate pain control while promoting appropriate opioid use and disposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"305 ","pages":"118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Opioid-related morbidity and mortality continue to rise with surgery often serving as the first exposure to opioids for patients. Few interventions focus on real-time education in the outpatient setting while patients are experiencing pain. The effect of short-messaging service (SMS) surveys with real-time opioid-use education (SMSE) and without (SMS) on outpatient postoperative opioid use was studied.

Methods: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial enrolled adults (≥18 y) who underwent outpatient general surgery procedures from January 1, 2020, to January 2, 2021. Participants received an automated daily SMS or SMSE for 10 d postoperatively. Primary outcomes included total opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and total pain scores. Data were gathered via real-time SMS patient responses.

Results: One hundred sixty patients were randomized to SMS (n = 82) or SMSE (n = 78). Patient demographic/clinical characteristics and surgery type were similar. Between SMS and SMSE, there were no differences in total pain scores (25 [interquartile range (IQR): 25.0] versus 31 [IQR: 35.7], P = 0.291) or total OME used (15.5 mg [IQR: 37.5] versus 15.8 mg [IQR: 45.6], P = 0.762). Increased total OME correlated with younger age (P = 0.001), opioids prescribed (P = 0.001), and preoperative opioid use (P = 0.018). Higher patient satisfaction was observed in patients with lower total pain scores and OME used, with no difference in opioids prescribed (P = 0.352). Subgroup analysis revealed open hernia repair patients in the SMSE group had lower OME used (0 mg [IQR: 0] versus 14.2 mg [IQR: 11.6], P = 0.004).

Conclusions: Real-time opioid-use education via SMS did not lead to a difference in opioid use, but demonstrated a high acceptance rate as a mode of communication and feedback. This finding should encourage further optimization of the SMS tool to rapidly identify patients with inadequate pain control while promoting appropriate opioid use and disposal.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信