Genomic imprinting and environmental epigenetics: Their influence on sheep reproductive traits across parities.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animal Reproduction Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107668
Fatemeh Tavasolian, Mohsen Gholizadeh, Hasan Hafezian
{"title":"Genomic imprinting and environmental epigenetics: Their influence on sheep reproductive traits across parities.","authors":"Fatemeh Tavasolian, Mohsen Gholizadeh, Hasan Hafezian","doi":"10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the impact of genomic imprinting on the genetic variance of composite reproductive traits across three parities in Baluchi sheep. The traits analyzed included litter mean weight per lamb born (LMWLB), litter mean weight per lamb weaned (LMWLW), total litter weight at birth (TLWB), and total litter weight at weaning (TLWW). We employed a univariate linear animal model for each trait, treating performance across parities as separate traits. Twenty-four animal models were assessed, incorporating direct additive genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, maternal permanent environmental effects, direct and maternal genetic covariances, as well as maternal and paternal imprinting. Model selection was based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). Direct heritability estimates for the traits were generally low, ranging from 0.039 ± 0.017 for LMWLW to 0.085 ± 0.028 for TLWW. TLWB and TLWW exhibited higher heritability than LMWLB and LMWLW in their respective parities. In the best model (model 24), maternal imprinting heritability estimates from the first to third parity were 0.059 ± 0.016, 0.060 ± 0.013, and 0.085 ± 0.021 for TLWB, 0.075 ± 0.021, 0.068 ± 0.025, and 0.048 ± 0.016 for LMWLB, 0.051 ± 0.013, 0.065 ± 0.019, and 0.068 ± 0.020 for TLWW, and, 0.072 ± 0.012, 0.057 ± 0.018 and 0.054 ± 0.011 for LMWLW, respectively. Paternal imprinting heritability estimates were consistently lower than maternal imprinting estimates, with values across parities ranging from 0.001 ± 0.024 to 0.019 ± 0.032 for TLWB, 0.005 ± 0.022-0.010 ± 0.019 for LMWLB, 0.012 ± 0.05-0.017 ± 0.05 for TLWW and, 0.013 ± 0.01-0.016 ± 0.01 for LMWLW. In conclusion, imprinting effects should be included in breeding programs to increase the accuracy of genetic evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7880,"journal":{"name":"Animal Reproduction Science","volume":"273 ","pages":"107668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Reproduction Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the impact of genomic imprinting on the genetic variance of composite reproductive traits across three parities in Baluchi sheep. The traits analyzed included litter mean weight per lamb born (LMWLB), litter mean weight per lamb weaned (LMWLW), total litter weight at birth (TLWB), and total litter weight at weaning (TLWW). We employed a univariate linear animal model for each trait, treating performance across parities as separate traits. Twenty-four animal models were assessed, incorporating direct additive genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, maternal permanent environmental effects, direct and maternal genetic covariances, as well as maternal and paternal imprinting. Model selection was based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). Direct heritability estimates for the traits were generally low, ranging from 0.039 ± 0.017 for LMWLW to 0.085 ± 0.028 for TLWW. TLWB and TLWW exhibited higher heritability than LMWLB and LMWLW in their respective parities. In the best model (model 24), maternal imprinting heritability estimates from the first to third parity were 0.059 ± 0.016, 0.060 ± 0.013, and 0.085 ± 0.021 for TLWB, 0.075 ± 0.021, 0.068 ± 0.025, and 0.048 ± 0.016 for LMWLB, 0.051 ± 0.013, 0.065 ± 0.019, and 0.068 ± 0.020 for TLWW, and, 0.072 ± 0.012, 0.057 ± 0.018 and 0.054 ± 0.011 for LMWLW, respectively. Paternal imprinting heritability estimates were consistently lower than maternal imprinting estimates, with values across parities ranging from 0.001 ± 0.024 to 0.019 ± 0.032 for TLWB, 0.005 ± 0.022-0.010 ± 0.019 for LMWLB, 0.012 ± 0.05-0.017 ± 0.05 for TLWW and, 0.013 ± 0.01-0.016 ± 0.01 for LMWLW. In conclusion, imprinting effects should be included in breeding programs to increase the accuracy of genetic evaluation.

基因组印记和环境表观遗传学:基因组印记与环境表观遗传学:它们对绵羊不同性别繁殖特征的影响
本研究旨在探讨基因组印记对俾路支绵羊三个等级的综合生殖性状遗传变异的影响。分析的性状包括每窝出生羔羊的平均体重(LMWLB)、每窝断奶羔羊的平均体重(LMWLW)、出生时的窝总重量(TLWB)和断奶时的窝总重量(TLWW)。我们对每个性状都采用了单变量线性动物模型,将不同妊娠期的表现视为不同的性状。我们评估了 24 个动物模型,其中包括直接加性遗传效应、母系遗传效应、母系永久环境效应、直接和母系遗传协方差以及母系和父系印记。模型选择基于阿凯克信息标准(AIC)。性状的直接遗传率估计值普遍较低,从 LMWLW 的 0.039 ± 0.017 到 TLWW 的 0.085 ± 0.028 不等。TLWB 和 TLWW 在各自的奇数中表现出比 LMWLB 和 LMWLW 更高的遗传率。在最佳模型(模型 24)中,TLWB 从第一至第三奇数的母系印记遗传力估计值分别为 0.059 ± 0.016、0.060 ± 0.013 和 0.085 ± 0.021,TLWWB 为 0.075 ± 0.021、0.TLWW分别为0.075±0.021、0.068±0.025和0.048±0.016,LMWLB分别为0.051±0.013、0.065±0.019和0.068±0.020,LMWLW分别为0.072±0.012、0.057±0.018和0.054±0.011。父系印记遗传率的估计值始终低于母系印记遗传率的估计值,不同奇数的值范围为:TLWB 0.001 ± 0.024 至 0.019 ± 0.032;LMWLB 0.005 ± 0.022-0.010 ± 0.019;TLWW 0.012 ± 0.05-0.017 ± 0.05;LMWLW 0.013 ± 0.01-0.016 ± 0.01。总之,应将印记效应纳入育种计划,以提高遗传评估的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Reproduction Science
Animal Reproduction Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Animal Reproduction Science publishes results from studies relating to reproduction and fertility in animals. This includes both fundamental research and applied studies, including management practices that increase our understanding of the biology and manipulation of reproduction. Manuscripts should go into depth in the mechanisms involved in the research reported, rather than a give a mere description of findings. The focus is on animals that are useful to humans including food- and fibre-producing; companion/recreational; captive; and endangered species including zoo animals, but excluding laboratory animals unless the results of the study provide new information that impacts the basic understanding of the biology or manipulation of reproduction. The journal''s scope includes the study of reproductive physiology and endocrinology, reproductive cycles, natural and artificial control of reproduction, preservation and use of gametes and embryos, pregnancy and parturition, infertility and sterility, diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. The Editorial Board of Animal Reproduction Science has decided not to publish papers in which there is an exclusive examination of the in vitro development of oocytes and embryos; however, there will be consideration of papers that include in vitro studies where the source of the oocytes and/or development of the embryos beyond the blastocyst stage is part of the experimental design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信