Fatemeh Tavasolian, Mohsen Gholizadeh, Hasan Hafezian
{"title":"Genomic imprinting and environmental epigenetics: Their influence on sheep reproductive traits across parities.","authors":"Fatemeh Tavasolian, Mohsen Gholizadeh, Hasan Hafezian","doi":"10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the impact of genomic imprinting on the genetic variance of composite reproductive traits across three parities in Baluchi sheep. The traits analyzed included litter mean weight per lamb born (LMWLB), litter mean weight per lamb weaned (LMWLW), total litter weight at birth (TLWB), and total litter weight at weaning (TLWW). We employed a univariate linear animal model for each trait, treating performance across parities as separate traits. Twenty-four animal models were assessed, incorporating direct additive genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, maternal permanent environmental effects, direct and maternal genetic covariances, as well as maternal and paternal imprinting. Model selection was based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). Direct heritability estimates for the traits were generally low, ranging from 0.039 ± 0.017 for LMWLW to 0.085 ± 0.028 for TLWW. TLWB and TLWW exhibited higher heritability than LMWLB and LMWLW in their respective parities. In the best model (model 24), maternal imprinting heritability estimates from the first to third parity were 0.059 ± 0.016, 0.060 ± 0.013, and 0.085 ± 0.021 for TLWB, 0.075 ± 0.021, 0.068 ± 0.025, and 0.048 ± 0.016 for LMWLB, 0.051 ± 0.013, 0.065 ± 0.019, and 0.068 ± 0.020 for TLWW, and, 0.072 ± 0.012, 0.057 ± 0.018 and 0.054 ± 0.011 for LMWLW, respectively. Paternal imprinting heritability estimates were consistently lower than maternal imprinting estimates, with values across parities ranging from 0.001 ± 0.024 to 0.019 ± 0.032 for TLWB, 0.005 ± 0.022-0.010 ± 0.019 for LMWLB, 0.012 ± 0.05-0.017 ± 0.05 for TLWW and, 0.013 ± 0.01-0.016 ± 0.01 for LMWLW. In conclusion, imprinting effects should be included in breeding programs to increase the accuracy of genetic evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7880,"journal":{"name":"Animal Reproduction Science","volume":"273 ","pages":"107668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Reproduction Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the impact of genomic imprinting on the genetic variance of composite reproductive traits across three parities in Baluchi sheep. The traits analyzed included litter mean weight per lamb born (LMWLB), litter mean weight per lamb weaned (LMWLW), total litter weight at birth (TLWB), and total litter weight at weaning (TLWW). We employed a univariate linear animal model for each trait, treating performance across parities as separate traits. Twenty-four animal models were assessed, incorporating direct additive genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, maternal permanent environmental effects, direct and maternal genetic covariances, as well as maternal and paternal imprinting. Model selection was based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). Direct heritability estimates for the traits were generally low, ranging from 0.039 ± 0.017 for LMWLW to 0.085 ± 0.028 for TLWW. TLWB and TLWW exhibited higher heritability than LMWLB and LMWLW in their respective parities. In the best model (model 24), maternal imprinting heritability estimates from the first to third parity were 0.059 ± 0.016, 0.060 ± 0.013, and 0.085 ± 0.021 for TLWB, 0.075 ± 0.021, 0.068 ± 0.025, and 0.048 ± 0.016 for LMWLB, 0.051 ± 0.013, 0.065 ± 0.019, and 0.068 ± 0.020 for TLWW, and, 0.072 ± 0.012, 0.057 ± 0.018 and 0.054 ± 0.011 for LMWLW, respectively. Paternal imprinting heritability estimates were consistently lower than maternal imprinting estimates, with values across parities ranging from 0.001 ± 0.024 to 0.019 ± 0.032 for TLWB, 0.005 ± 0.022-0.010 ± 0.019 for LMWLB, 0.012 ± 0.05-0.017 ± 0.05 for TLWW and, 0.013 ± 0.01-0.016 ± 0.01 for LMWLW. In conclusion, imprinting effects should be included in breeding programs to increase the accuracy of genetic evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Animal Reproduction Science publishes results from studies relating to reproduction and fertility in animals. This includes both fundamental research and applied studies, including management practices that increase our understanding of the biology and manipulation of reproduction. Manuscripts should go into depth in the mechanisms involved in the research reported, rather than a give a mere description of findings. The focus is on animals that are useful to humans including food- and fibre-producing; companion/recreational; captive; and endangered species including zoo animals, but excluding laboratory animals unless the results of the study provide new information that impacts the basic understanding of the biology or manipulation of reproduction.
The journal''s scope includes the study of reproductive physiology and endocrinology, reproductive cycles, natural and artificial control of reproduction, preservation and use of gametes and embryos, pregnancy and parturition, infertility and sterility, diagnostic and therapeutic techniques.
The Editorial Board of Animal Reproduction Science has decided not to publish papers in which there is an exclusive examination of the in vitro development of oocytes and embryos; however, there will be consideration of papers that include in vitro studies where the source of the oocytes and/or development of the embryos beyond the blastocyst stage is part of the experimental design.