Synergizing Intuitive Physics and Big Data in Deep Learning: Can We Obtain Process Insights While Maintaining State-Of-The-Art Hydrological Prediction Capability?

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Leilei He, Liangsheng Shi, Wenxiang Song, Jiawen Shen, Lijun Wang, Xiaolong Hu, Yuanyuan Zha
{"title":"Synergizing Intuitive Physics and Big Data in Deep Learning: Can We Obtain Process Insights While Maintaining State-Of-The-Art Hydrological Prediction Capability?","authors":"Leilei He, Liangsheng Shi, Wenxiang Song, Jiawen Shen, Lijun Wang, Xiaolong Hu, Yuanyuan Zha","doi":"10.1029/2024wr037582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have created insurmountable performance in prediction tasks for geoscientific problems yet are unable to derive process insights and answer specific scientific questions. The geoscience community faces a dilemma of reconciling process comprehension with high predictive accuracy. Here we introduce a deep process learning (DPL) approach empowering neural networks to deduce intrinsic processes from observable data, wherein the intuitive physics of geosystems is directly coupled within the deep learning (DL) architecture as structural prior. We aim to incorporate as raw common concepts as possible as macroscopic guidance: on the one hand, to reduce interference with DL's data adaptability. On the other hand, to allow the information flow of the model to converge along specific paths toward the target output, thus enabling the potential to gain process insights with limited supervision. Illustrating its application to precipitation-runoff modeling across the USA, DPL yields an ensemble median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.758 and Kling-Gupta efficiency of 0.778 with robust transferability, compared to 0.762 and 0.751 for the state-of-the-art DL model. The good match between internal representations of DPL and independent data sets of snow water equivalent and evapotranspiration, along with its superior capability for catchment water budget closures, demonstrates proficient process mastery. The study also highlights beneficial synergies from large-scale data collaboration, promoting the organic unity of process understanding and predictive performance. This work shows a promising avenue for learning processes from big data and will benefit geoscientific domains that remain concerned with process clarity in the era of AI.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have created insurmountable performance in prediction tasks for geoscientific problems yet are unable to derive process insights and answer specific scientific questions. The geoscience community faces a dilemma of reconciling process comprehension with high predictive accuracy. Here we introduce a deep process learning (DPL) approach empowering neural networks to deduce intrinsic processes from observable data, wherein the intuitive physics of geosystems is directly coupled within the deep learning (DL) architecture as structural prior. We aim to incorporate as raw common concepts as possible as macroscopic guidance: on the one hand, to reduce interference with DL's data adaptability. On the other hand, to allow the information flow of the model to converge along specific paths toward the target output, thus enabling the potential to gain process insights with limited supervision. Illustrating its application to precipitation-runoff modeling across the USA, DPL yields an ensemble median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.758 and Kling-Gupta efficiency of 0.778 with robust transferability, compared to 0.762 and 0.751 for the state-of-the-art DL model. The good match between internal representations of DPL and independent data sets of snow water equivalent and evapotranspiration, along with its superior capability for catchment water budget closures, demonstrates proficient process mastery. The study also highlights beneficial synergies from large-scale data collaboration, promoting the organic unity of process understanding and predictive performance. This work shows a promising avenue for learning processes from big data and will benefit geoscientific domains that remain concerned with process clarity in the era of AI.
人工智能(AI)方法在地质科学问题的预测任务中创造了难以逾越的性能,但却无法获得过程洞察力和回答具体的科学问题。地质科学界面临着如何协调过程理解与高预测精度的难题。在这里,我们介绍一种深度过程学习(DPL)方法,它赋予神经网络从可观测数据中推导内在过程的能力,其中地质系统的直观物理学作为结构先验直接耦合到深度学习(DL)架构中。我们的目标是将尽可能原始的普通概念作为宏观指导:一方面,减少对 DL 数据适应性的干扰。另一方面,让模型的信息流沿着特定路径向目标输出汇聚,从而在有限的监督下获得过程洞察力。DPL 模型在美国降水径流建模中的应用说明,DPL 模型的集合中位纳什-苏特克利夫效率为 0.758,克林-古普塔效率为 0.778,具有很强的可移植性,而最先进的 DL 模型的集合中位纳什-苏特克利夫效率为 0.762,克林-古普塔效率为 0.751。DPL 的内部表示与雪水当量和蒸散量的独立数据集之间的良好匹配,以及其在流域水预算闭合方面的卓越能力,显示了对过程的熟练掌握。该研究还强调了大规模数据协作的有益协同作用,促进了过程理解与预测性能的有机统一。这项工作为从大数据中学习过程提供了一条大有可为的途径,并将惠及在人工智能时代仍然关注过程清晰度的地球科学领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信