An integral assessment of carbon and nitrogen emissions in dairy cattle production systems: Comparing dynamic process-based greenhouse gas emissions factors with IPCC Tier 1 and Tier 2 approaches in confinement and pasture-based systems

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Latifa Ouatahar, Barbara Amon, André Bannink, Thomas Amon, Jürgen Zentek, Jia Deng, David Janke, Sabrina Hempel, Pierre Beukes, Tony van der Weerden, Dominika Krol, Gary J. Lanigan
{"title":"An integral assessment of carbon and nitrogen emissions in dairy cattle production systems: Comparing dynamic process-based greenhouse gas emissions factors with IPCC Tier 1 and Tier 2 approaches in confinement and pasture-based systems","authors":"Latifa Ouatahar, Barbara Amon, André Bannink, Thomas Amon, Jürgen Zentek, Jia Deng, David Janke, Sabrina Hempel, Pierre Beukes, Tony van der Weerden, Dominika Krol, Gary J. Lanigan","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of greenhouse gases (GHG) and nitrogen (N) emissions is essential for climate change mitigation. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides guidelines for GHG quantification at both national and global levels. However, the IPCC Tier 1 (T1) and Tier 2 (T2) estimates, mostly used in national inventories, rely on generic emission factors (EFs) and empirical equations that are not suitable for case-specific assessments on individual farms. Thus, a more advanced Tier 3 (T3) methodology is needed to reflect the impact of key factors on emissions and reveal the effect of emission mitigation measures. Here we compare the IPCC T1 and T2 estimates to results from a cascade of process-based (PB) models referred to as T3 approach, for farm-level emissions. The results showed that the estimates from PB models differ significantly from those of the IPCC T1 and T2 estimates and allow more capability to predict variation. Moreover, PB models account for temporal changes and the underlying mechanisms responsible for GHG and N emissions. These models can be adopted for case-specific GHG assessment and project future mitigation strategies under different climate scenarios, regional contexts and on-farm management. Additional to the known applicability of PB models to estimate enteric methane and soil emissions, the present study demonstrates for the first time in Germany and Europe the effectiveness of Manure-DNDC model in simulating ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) barn emissions, highlighting the potential for using PB models in case-specific GHG and N assessments for the whole manure management chain. Overall, this study presents options for a methodology in case-specific GHG assessment that can capture the effect of climate change and mitigation measures.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144479","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of greenhouse gases (GHG) and nitrogen (N) emissions is essential for climate change mitigation. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides guidelines for GHG quantification at both national and global levels. However, the IPCC Tier 1 (T1) and Tier 2 (T2) estimates, mostly used in national inventories, rely on generic emission factors (EFs) and empirical equations that are not suitable for case-specific assessments on individual farms. Thus, a more advanced Tier 3 (T3) methodology is needed to reflect the impact of key factors on emissions and reveal the effect of emission mitigation measures. Here we compare the IPCC T1 and T2 estimates to results from a cascade of process-based (PB) models referred to as T3 approach, for farm-level emissions. The results showed that the estimates from PB models differ significantly from those of the IPCC T1 and T2 estimates and allow more capability to predict variation. Moreover, PB models account for temporal changes and the underlying mechanisms responsible for GHG and N emissions. These models can be adopted for case-specific GHG assessment and project future mitigation strategies under different climate scenarios, regional contexts and on-farm management. Additional to the known applicability of PB models to estimate enteric methane and soil emissions, the present study demonstrates for the first time in Germany and Europe the effectiveness of Manure-DNDC model in simulating ammonia (NH3) and methane (CH4) barn emissions, highlighting the potential for using PB models in case-specific GHG and N assessments for the whole manure management chain. Overall, this study presents options for a methodology in case-specific GHG assessment that can capture the effect of climate change and mitigation measures.

Abstract Image

评估温室气体(GHG)和氮气(N)排放对减缓气候变化至关重要。政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)提供了国家和全球层面的温室气体量化指南。然而,IPCC 第一级(T1)和第二级(T2)估算大多用于国家清单,依赖于通用排放因子(EF)和经验方程,不适合对单个农场进行具体评估。因此,需要更先进的第三级 (T3) 方法来反映关键因素对排放的影响,并揭示减排措施的效果。在此,我们将 IPCC T1 和 T2 估算值与基于过程(PB)的级联模型(称为 T3 方法)得出的农场级排放结果进行了比较。结果表明,PB 模型的估算结果与 IPCC T1 和 T2 的估算结果差别很大,而且预测变化的能力更强。此外,PB 模型还考虑了时间变化以及温室气体和氮排放的基本机制。这些模型可用于特定情况下的温室气体评估,并预测不同气候情景、地区背景和农场管理下的未来减排策略。除了已知的 PB 模型适用于估算肠道甲烷和土壤排放量之外,本研究还首次在德国和欧洲展示了 Manure-DNDC 模型在模拟氨气 (NH3) 和甲烷 (CH4) 谷仓排放方面的有效性,突出了在整个粪肥管理链中使用 PB 模型进行特定案例温室气体和氮排放评估的潜力。总之,本研究为针对具体情况的温室气体评估方法提供了可选方案,该方法可捕捉到气候变化和减缓措施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信