Comparing anesthesia protocols in high intensity focused ultrasound treatments: The HIFU-pain study.

Paolo Casoni, Emanuele Nanni, Matteo Pizzamiglio, Daniele Bissacco
{"title":"Comparing anesthesia protocols in high intensity focused ultrasound treatments: The HIFU-pain study.","authors":"Paolo Casoni, Emanuele Nanni, Matteo Pizzamiglio, Daniele Bissacco","doi":"10.1177/02683555241308044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>to compare different anesthesia protocols during High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for saphenous trunk (GSV/SSV) and/or varicosities incompetence treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>patients with GSV/SSV incompetence with varicose veins underwent HIFU under different anesthesia protocols. The primary endpoint was the pain score during HIFU using a 10-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 262 legs analyzed, main pain score was 1.03 ± 1.27. Intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments resulted in less procedural pain if compared with intradermal ± perivenous protocols (1.30 ± 0.19 vs 0.81 ± 0.09; <i>p</i> = .001). Conversely, perivenous injection decrease early complete recanalization rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary results suggest that HIFU is an almost pain-free procedure. Procedural pain could be further minimized by using specific intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments, despite perivenous anesthetic could improve postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555241308044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241308044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: to compare different anesthesia protocols during High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for saphenous trunk (GSV/SSV) and/or varicosities incompetence treatment.

Material and methods: patients with GSV/SSV incompetence with varicose veins underwent HIFU under different anesthesia protocols. The primary endpoint was the pain score during HIFU using a 10-point scale.

Results: Out of 262 legs analyzed, main pain score was 1.03 ± 1.27. Intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments resulted in less procedural pain if compared with intradermal ± perivenous protocols (1.30 ± 0.19 vs 0.81 ± 0.09; p = .001). Conversely, perivenous injection decrease early complete recanalization rate.

Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that HIFU is an almost pain-free procedure. Procedural pain could be further minimized by using specific intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments, despite perivenous anesthetic could improve postoperative outcomes.

背景:比较高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗隐静脉主干(GSV/SSV)和/或曲张静脉功能不全期间的不同麻醉方案。材料与方法:GSV/SSV功能不全和曲张静脉患者在不同麻醉方案下接受HIFU治疗。主要终点是HIFU治疗过程中的疼痛评分,采用10分制:结果:在分析的 262 条腿中,主要疼痛评分为 1.03 ± 1.27。皮内+口服麻醉与皮内+静脉注射相比,手术疼痛更轻(1.30 ± 0.19 vs 0.81 ± 0.09; p = .001)。相反,静脉周围注射降低了早期完全再通率:这些初步结果表明,HIFU 是一种几乎无痛的手术。结论:这些初步结果表明,HIFU 是一种几乎无痛的手术,通过使用特定的皮内+口服麻醉治疗可进一步减少手术疼痛,尽管静脉周围麻醉可改善术后效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信