In vitro toxicological evaluation of pouched portioned oral nicotine products.

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2024.1452274
Brian M Keyser, Robert Leverette, Reagan McRae, John Wertman, Tom Shutsky, Ken Szeliga, Patrudu Makena, Kristen G Jordan
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> toxicological evaluation of pouched portioned oral nicotine products.","authors":"Brian M Keyser, Robert Leverette, Reagan McRae, John Wertman, Tom Shutsky, Ken Szeliga, Patrudu Makena, Kristen G Jordan","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2024.1452274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Modern oral nicotine pouch products (ONPs) are a category of oral nicotine products which contain pharmaceutical-grade nicotine, flavors, and other food-grade ingredients but no tobacco leaf. Recent reports indicate that ONPs in general do not contain (or only at minimal levels) the harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) identified in cigarette smoke, suggesting their potential as alternative products for reducing harm from cigarette smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed <i>in vitro</i> toxicological effects of eight ONPs, designated as modern oral (MO) 1 to 8 along with an ONP, an oral tobacco (snus), and a combustible cigarette market comparator using established regulatory toxicological assays including Ames, <i>in vitro</i> micronucleus (ivMN), and neutral red uptake (NRU) assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MO test products 1-7 ZYN wintergreen, and General Snus white mint were negative for mutagenicity (Ames assay), genotoxicity (ivMN), and cytotoxicity (NRU). The combustible cigarette was positive in all three assays. The MO-8 test product was negative for mutagenicity; however, it was positive in the ivMN and NRU assays at concentrations either 42 to 135-fold based on the ivMN i to iv treatment schedule or 60-fold higher, respectively, when compared to combustible cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Thus, the MO test products are likely to be less harmful than combustible cigarettes and are alternatives to cigarettes. However, understanding of long-term effects of ONPs in general requires additional research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1452274"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1452274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Modern oral nicotine pouch products (ONPs) are a category of oral nicotine products which contain pharmaceutical-grade nicotine, flavors, and other food-grade ingredients but no tobacco leaf. Recent reports indicate that ONPs in general do not contain (or only at minimal levels) the harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) identified in cigarette smoke, suggesting their potential as alternative products for reducing harm from cigarette smoking.

Methods: We assessed in vitro toxicological effects of eight ONPs, designated as modern oral (MO) 1 to 8 along with an ONP, an oral tobacco (snus), and a combustible cigarette market comparator using established regulatory toxicological assays including Ames, in vitro micronucleus (ivMN), and neutral red uptake (NRU) assays.

Results: The MO test products 1-7 ZYN wintergreen, and General Snus white mint were negative for mutagenicity (Ames assay), genotoxicity (ivMN), and cytotoxicity (NRU). The combustible cigarette was positive in all three assays. The MO-8 test product was negative for mutagenicity; however, it was positive in the ivMN and NRU assays at concentrations either 42 to 135-fold based on the ivMN i to iv treatment schedule or 60-fold higher, respectively, when compared to combustible cigarettes.

Discussion: Thus, the MO test products are likely to be less harmful than combustible cigarettes and are alternatives to cigarettes. However, understanding of long-term effects of ONPs in general requires additional research.

袋装口服尼古丁产品的体外毒理学评价。
现代口服尼古丁袋产品(ONPs)是一类含有药用级尼古丁、香精和其他食品级成分,但不含烟叶的口服尼古丁产品。最近的报告表明,onp一般不含(或仅含有极少量)香烟烟雾中确定的有害和潜在有害成分(HPHCs),这表明它们有潜力成为减少吸烟危害的替代产品。方法:我们使用包括Ames、体外微核(ivMN)和中性红色摄取(NRU)试验在内的既定监管毒理学试验,评估了8种ONP(现代口服(MO) 1至8)以及一种ONP、一种口服烟草(snus)和一种可燃卷烟市场比较物)的体外毒理学效应。结果:MO试验产品1 ~ 7 ZYN冬青、General Snus白薄荷致突变性(Ames试验)、遗传毒性(ivMN)、细胞毒性(NRU)均为阴性。可燃香烟在所有三项检测中均呈阳性。MO-8试验产物致突变性阴性;然而,与可燃香烟相比,在ivMN i至iv处理方案的浓度为42至135倍或60倍时,它在ivMN和NRU检测中呈阳性。讨论:因此,MO测试产品可能比可燃香烟危害更小,是香烟的替代品。然而,一般来说,了解onp的长期影响需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信