How do Patient-Reported Outcomes Correlate with Real-Time Objective Measures of Function after Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective Study Using Daily Gait Metrics.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Kevin A Wu, David N Kugelman, Rahul K Goel, Eric S Dilbone, Sean P Ryan, Samuel S Wellman, Michael P Bolognesi, Thorsten M Seyler
{"title":"How do Patient-Reported Outcomes Correlate with Real-Time Objective Measures of Function after Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective Study Using Daily Gait Metrics.","authors":"Kevin A Wu, David N Kugelman, Rahul K Goel, Eric S Dilbone, Sean P Ryan, Samuel S Wellman, Michael P Bolognesi, Thorsten M Seyler","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) are essential for evaluating patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While wearable technologies offer objective measures of physical function through Apple HealthKit, their relationship with PROs in TKA patients is not well understood. We investigated the association between commonly used PROs and objective measures of physical function in patients undergoing TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 152 patients undergoing unilateral TKA, assessing PROs (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement [KOOS, JR] and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire [EQ-5D]) and objective HealthKit metrics (gait speed, step count, standing duration, steadiness, estimated six-minute walk test) before and at one, six, and 12 months after surgery. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to analyze the relationship between PROs and HealthKit metrics at each time point, adjusting for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements were observed in PROs post-TKA. The KOOS, JR scores improved from 52.1 ± 11.9 and rest preoperatively to 82.5 ± 13.2 at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.001), and EQ5D scores improved from 73.9 ± 17.8 to 85.7 ± 11.6 over the same period (P < 0.001). However, correlations between PROs and HealthKit metrics were consistently low (mean r = 0.2 to 0.3) and not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons at various operative time points. Notably, correlations among HealthKit metrics themselves remained high, indicating that objective measures were internally consistent but not strongly related to PROs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite their importance in patient-centered care, PROs may not fully reflect actual physical function. Clinicians should consider incorporating objective measures, such as those provided by HealthKit, into routine assessments to obtain a more comprehensive view of patient recovery post-TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.12.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) are essential for evaluating patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While wearable technologies offer objective measures of physical function through Apple HealthKit, their relationship with PROs in TKA patients is not well understood. We investigated the association between commonly used PROs and objective measures of physical function in patients undergoing TKA.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 152 patients undergoing unilateral TKA, assessing PROs (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement [KOOS, JR] and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire [EQ-5D]) and objective HealthKit metrics (gait speed, step count, standing duration, steadiness, estimated six-minute walk test) before and at one, six, and 12 months after surgery. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to analyze the relationship between PROs and HealthKit metrics at each time point, adjusting for multiple comparisons.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in PROs post-TKA. The KOOS, JR scores improved from 52.1 ± 11.9 and rest preoperatively to 82.5 ± 13.2 at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.001), and EQ5D scores improved from 73.9 ± 17.8 to 85.7 ± 11.6 over the same period (P < 0.001). However, correlations between PROs and HealthKit metrics were consistently low (mean r = 0.2 to 0.3) and not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons at various operative time points. Notably, correlations among HealthKit metrics themselves remained high, indicating that objective measures were internally consistent but not strongly related to PROs.

Conclusion: Despite their importance in patient-centered care, PROs may not fully reflect actual physical function. Clinicians should consider incorporating objective measures, such as those provided by HealthKit, into routine assessments to obtain a more comprehensive view of patient recovery post-TKA.

患者报告的结果与全膝关节置换术后功能的实时客观测量结果有何关联?使用每日步态指标的前瞻性研究。
简介:患者报告结果指标(PROs)对于评估接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者至关重要。虽然可穿戴技术通过苹果 HealthKit 提供了客观的身体功能测量方法,但它们与 TKA 患者的患者报告结果之间的关系还不十分清楚。我们研究了在接受 TKA 手术的患者中常用的 PROs 与身体功能客观测量值之间的关系:我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,涉及 152 名接受单侧 TKA 的患者,评估了术前、术后 1 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的 PROs(膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分、关节置换 [KOOS, JR] 和 EuroQol 五维问卷 [EQ-5D])和 HealthKit 客观指标(步速、步数、站立时间、稳定性、估计六分钟步行测试)。使用皮尔逊相关系数分析每个时间点的PROs和HealthKit指标之间的关系,并对多重比较进行调整:结果:TKA术后的PROs显著改善。KOOS、JR评分从术前的52.1±11.9分和休息评分提高到术后12个月的82.5±13.2分(P<0.001),同期EQ5D评分从73.9±17.8分提高到85.7±11.6分(P<0.001)。然而,PROs 和 HealthKit 指标之间的相关性始终较低(平均 r = 0.2 至 0.3),且在不同手术时间点进行多重比较调整后,相关性并不显著。值得注意的是,HealthKit 指标本身之间的相关性仍然很高,这表明客观指标具有内部一致性,但与 PROs 的相关性并不强:尽管PROs在以患者为中心的护理中非常重要,但它们可能无法完全反映实际的身体功能。临床医生应考虑将 HealthKit 等客观指标纳入常规评估,以便更全面地了解患者在 TKA 术后的恢复情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信