Magnitude, determinants, and adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy among pregnant mothers in low- and middle-income countries: An umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gizachew Yilak, Tegene Atamenta Kitaw, Biruk Beletew Abate, Alemu Birara Zemariam, Addis Wondmagegn Alamaw, Eyob Shitie Lake, Mulat Ayele, Alemayehu Sayih Belay, Addisu Getie, Befkad Derese Tilahun
{"title":"Magnitude, determinants, and adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy among pregnant mothers in low- and middle-income countries: An umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gizachew Yilak, Tegene Atamenta Kitaw, Biruk Beletew Abate, Alemu Birara Zemariam, Addis Wondmagegn Alamaw, Eyob Shitie Lake, Mulat Ayele, Alemayehu Sayih Belay, Addisu Getie, Befkad Derese Tilahun","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on unintended pregnancies in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are inconsistent, posing challenges for preventive efforts. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the magnitude, determinants, and adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy among pregnant mothers in LMICs: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, as well as databases specific to systematic reviews, such as the Cochrane Database, have investigated the magnitude, risk factors, and adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy in LMICs. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. The estimates from the included studies regarding the magnitude and predictors of unintended pregnancy were then pooled and summarised using random-effects meta-analysis models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 systematic review and meta-analysis (SRM) studies involving 1 446 122 women. The summary estimate for the magnitude of unintended pregnancy was 28.38% (95% CI = 23.06-33.7%, I<sup>2</sup> = 100%). From the umbrella review, the reported factors and complications of statistical significance were as follows: maternal illiteracy (AOR = 3.79; 95% CI = 1.36-8.94), being unmarried (AOR = 12.98; 95% CI = 1.88-27.85), lack of communication with the husband about family planning (AOR = 3.43; 95% CI = 1.68-5.19), inability to attend antenatal care (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.62-2.17), never using family planning (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.62-2.17), maternal depression (AOR = 1.72; 95% CI = 0.81-2.64), stunting (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.25-2.48), and parity 3.83 (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.3-11.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pooled magnitude of unintended pregnancies in LMICs was high. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate family planning and maternal health care services to prevent unintended pregnancy. Additionally, interventions targeting rural, unmarried, less-educated, and adolescent women are important for preventing unintended pregnancies in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on unintended pregnancies in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are inconsistent, posing challenges for preventive efforts. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the magnitude, determinants, and adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy among pregnant mothers in LMICs: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, as well as databases specific to systematic reviews, such as the Cochrane Database, have investigated the magnitude, risk factors, and adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy in LMICs. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. The estimates from the included studies regarding the magnitude and predictors of unintended pregnancy were then pooled and summarised using random-effects meta-analysis models.

Results: We included 13 systematic review and meta-analysis (SRM) studies involving 1 446 122 women. The summary estimate for the magnitude of unintended pregnancy was 28.38% (95% CI = 23.06-33.7%, I2 = 100%). From the umbrella review, the reported factors and complications of statistical significance were as follows: maternal illiteracy (AOR = 3.79; 95% CI = 1.36-8.94), being unmarried (AOR = 12.98; 95% CI = 1.88-27.85), lack of communication with the husband about family planning (AOR = 3.43; 95% CI = 1.68-5.19), inability to attend antenatal care (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.62-2.17), never using family planning (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.62-2.17), maternal depression (AOR = 1.72; 95% CI = 0.81-2.64), stunting (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.25-2.48), and parity 3.83 (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.3-11.3).

Conclusions: The pooled magnitude of unintended pregnancies in LMICs was high. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate family planning and maternal health care services to prevent unintended pregnancy. Additionally, interventions targeting rural, unmarried, less-educated, and adolescent women are important for preventing unintended pregnancies in LMICs.

中低收入国家孕妇意外怀孕的程度、决定因素和不良后果:系统综述和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信