Towards better care: Comprehensive review of patient-reported patient engagement instruments in healthcare.

IF 2.9 2区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108601

Minjuan Wu, Xiane Jia, Yichao Zhang, Wenjun Chen

{"title":"Towards better care: Comprehensive review of patient-reported patient engagement instruments in healthcare.","authors":"Minjuan Wu, Xiane Jia, Yichao Zhang, Wenjun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Patient engagement is widely recognized as essential for improving healthcare quality and reducing costs; however, its formal evaluation presents significant challenges. The aim of this review was to assess instruments for measuring patient engagement in healthcare from the patients' perspective and to evaluate their psychometric properties.Methods: A systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of patient-reported questionnaires assessing patient engagement. Studies published up to August 4, 2024, were included and appraised using the COSMIN checklist.Results: Forty-one studies were included in this review. The most commonly used content to describe patient engagement were 'preference', 'experiences', 'willingness', and 'informative feedback'. Few patient engagement questionnaires were designed for specific populations and lack theoretical foundation.Conclusion: Further research is essential to develop valid, reliable, and feasible methodologies for assessing patient engagement within the framework of ongoing care quality improvement.Practice implications: Evaluating patient engagement instruments aids in developing reliable and valid tools that better align with patient needs and preferences.","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"132 ","pages":"108601"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patient engagement is widely recognized as essential for improving healthcare quality and reducing costs; however, its formal evaluation presents significant challenges. The aim of this review was to assess instruments for measuring patient engagement in healthcare from the patients' perspective and to evaluate their psychometric properties.

Methods: A systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of patient-reported questionnaires assessing patient engagement. Studies published up to August 4, 2024, were included and appraised using the COSMIN checklist.

Results: Forty-one studies were included in this review. The most commonly used content to describe patient engagement were 'preference', 'experiences', 'willingness', and 'informative feedback'. Few patient engagement questionnaires were designed for specific populations and lack theoretical foundation.

Conclusion: Further research is essential to develop valid, reliable, and feasible methodologies for assessing patient engagement within the framework of ongoing care quality improvement.

Practice implications: Evaluating patient engagement instruments aids in developing reliable and valid tools that better align with patient needs and preferences.

查看原文本刊更多论文

实现更好的护理：全面回顾医疗保健领域的患者参与工具。

目的：患者参与被广泛认为是提高医疗质量和降低成本的必要条件；然而，其正式评价提出了重大挑战。本综述的目的是从患者的角度评估用于测量患者参与医疗保健的工具，并评估其心理测量特性。方法：根据PRISMA指南进行系统回顾，以评估患者报告的评估患者参与的问卷的心理测量特性。截至2024年8月4日发表的研究被纳入并使用COSMIN清单进行评估。结果：本综述纳入了41项研究。描述患者参与最常用的内容是“偏好”、“经验”、“意愿”和“信息反馈”。针对特定人群设计的患者参与问卷很少，缺乏理论依据。结论：进一步的研究是必要的，以开发有效的，可靠的，可行的方法来评估患者参与的框架内持续的护理质量的改善。实践意义：评估患者参与工具有助于开发可靠和有效的工具，更好地符合患者的需求和偏好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

5.60

自引率

11.40%

发文量

384

审稿时长

46 days

期刊介绍： Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.