Treatment Pressures and the Predicament of Family Care: A Grounded Theory Study With Relatives of People With a Serious Mental Health Condition.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Christin Hempeler, Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Georg Juckel, Sarah Potthoff
{"title":"Treatment Pressures and the Predicament of Family Care: A Grounded Theory Study With Relatives of People With a Serious Mental Health Condition.","authors":"Christin Hempeler, Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Georg Juckel, Sarah Potthoff","doi":"10.1177/10497323241300042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relatives are increasingly recognized as important in the care of people with a serious mental health condition, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Research indicates that in providing care, relatives use so-called treatment pressures, such as persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, or threats, to promote the treatment compliance of their family member. This grounded theory study investigated why relatives use treatment pressures by analyzing the experiences of relatives of people with a serious mental health condition before, during, and after mental health crises of their family member. We conducted 11 semi-structured, problem-centered interviews with such relatives in Germany between October 2019 and January 2020. Our analysis showed that the key category of relatives' experiences is a predicament characterized by feeling responsible to take action while experiencing a limited range of action. Relatives' perceived responsibility to take action had three dimensions: relatives' worries about their family member and other members of the family, societal norms and expectations, and the transfer of responsibility from the mental healthcare system to relatives. The limitation of relatives' scope of action also had three dimensions: their family member's opposition to treatment, legal criteria for involuntary commitment or treatment, and their dependency on mental healthcare professionals and the mental healthcare system. We reconstructed three different ways in which relatives may deal with this predicament: assuming responsibility for their family member's treatment, which involved exerting treatment pressures, staying out of their family member's mental health-related matters, and focusing on their own well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241300042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241300042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relatives are increasingly recognized as important in the care of people with a serious mental health condition, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Research indicates that in providing care, relatives use so-called treatment pressures, such as persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, or threats, to promote the treatment compliance of their family member. This grounded theory study investigated why relatives use treatment pressures by analyzing the experiences of relatives of people with a serious mental health condition before, during, and after mental health crises of their family member. We conducted 11 semi-structured, problem-centered interviews with such relatives in Germany between October 2019 and January 2020. Our analysis showed that the key category of relatives' experiences is a predicament characterized by feeling responsible to take action while experiencing a limited range of action. Relatives' perceived responsibility to take action had three dimensions: relatives' worries about their family member and other members of the family, societal norms and expectations, and the transfer of responsibility from the mental healthcare system to relatives. The limitation of relatives' scope of action also had three dimensions: their family member's opposition to treatment, legal criteria for involuntary commitment or treatment, and their dependency on mental healthcare professionals and the mental healthcare system. We reconstructed three different ways in which relatives may deal with this predicament: assuming responsibility for their family member's treatment, which involved exerting treatment pressures, staying out of their family member's mental health-related matters, and focusing on their own well-being.

治疗压力与家庭护理的困境:对严重精神疾病患者亲属的基础理论研究》。
人们越来越认识到,亲属在照顾患有严重精神疾病(如重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍或精神分裂症)的人方面发挥着重要作用。研究表明,在提供护理时,亲属使用所谓的治疗压力,如劝说、人际关系杠杆、引诱或威胁,以促进其家庭成员的治疗依从性。这一扎根理论研究通过分析患有严重精神疾病的亲属在其家庭成员精神健康危机之前、期间和之后的经历,调查了亲属为什么会使用治疗压力。2019年10月至2020年1月,我们在德国对这些亲属进行了11次半结构化、以问题为中心的访谈。我们的分析表明,亲属经历的关键类别是一种困境,其特征是感觉有责任采取行动,而经历的行动范围有限。亲属采取行动的感知责任有三个维度:亲属对其家庭成员和其他家庭成员的担忧,社会规范和期望,以及责任从精神卫生保健系统向亲属的转移。亲属诉讼范围的限制也有三个方面:其家庭成员对治疗的反对,非自愿承诺或治疗的法律标准,以及他们对精神保健专业人员和精神保健系统的依赖。我们重构了亲属应对这种困境的三种不同方式:承担家庭成员的治疗责任,这包括施加治疗压力,远离家庭成员的心理健康问题,以及关注自己的幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信