The Relationship of Pitch Discrimination with Segregation of Tonal and Speech Streams for Cochlear Implant Users.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Andres Camarena, Matthew Ardis, Takako Fujioka, Matthew B Fitzgerald, Raymond L Goldsworthy
{"title":"The Relationship of Pitch Discrimination with Segregation of Tonal and Speech Streams for Cochlear Implant Users.","authors":"Andres Camarena, Matthew Ardis, Takako Fujioka, Matthew B Fitzgerald, Raymond L Goldsworthy","doi":"10.1177/23312165241305049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cochlear implant (CI) users often complain about music appreciation and speech recognition in background noise, which depend on segregating sound sources into perceptual streams. The present study examined relationships between frequency and fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination with stream segregation of tonal and speech streams for CI users and peers with no known hearing loss. Frequency and F0 discrimination were measured for 1,000 Hz pure tones and 110 Hz complex tones, respectively. Stream segregation was measured for pure and complex tones using a lead/lag delay detection task. Spondee word identification was measured in competing speech with high levels of informational masking that required listeners to use F0 to segregate speech. The hypotheses were that frequency and F0 discrimination would explain a significant portion of the variance in outcomes for tonal segregation and speech reception. On average, CI users received a large benefit for stream segregation of tonal streams when either the frequency or F0 of the competing stream was shifted relative to the target stream. A linear relationship accounted for 42% of the covariance between measures of stream segregation and complex tone discrimination for CI users. In contrast, such benefits were absent when the F0 of the competing speech was shifted relative to the target speech. The large benefit observed for tonal streams is promising for music listening if it transfers to separating instruments within a song; however, the lack of benefit for speech suggests separate mechanisms, or special requirements, for speech processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"28 ","pages":"23312165241305049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165241305049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users often complain about music appreciation and speech recognition in background noise, which depend on segregating sound sources into perceptual streams. The present study examined relationships between frequency and fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination with stream segregation of tonal and speech streams for CI users and peers with no known hearing loss. Frequency and F0 discrimination were measured for 1,000 Hz pure tones and 110 Hz complex tones, respectively. Stream segregation was measured for pure and complex tones using a lead/lag delay detection task. Spondee word identification was measured in competing speech with high levels of informational masking that required listeners to use F0 to segregate speech. The hypotheses were that frequency and F0 discrimination would explain a significant portion of the variance in outcomes for tonal segregation and speech reception. On average, CI users received a large benefit for stream segregation of tonal streams when either the frequency or F0 of the competing stream was shifted relative to the target stream. A linear relationship accounted for 42% of the covariance between measures of stream segregation and complex tone discrimination for CI users. In contrast, such benefits were absent when the F0 of the competing speech was shifted relative to the target speech. The large benefit observed for tonal streams is promising for music listening if it transfers to separating instruments within a song; however, the lack of benefit for speech suggests separate mechanisms, or special requirements, for speech processing.

人工耳蜗使用者的音高辨别与音调和语音流分离的关系
人工耳蜗(CI)使用者经常抱怨背景噪声中的音乐欣赏和语音识别问题,而这取决于将声源分离成感知流。本研究考察了人工耳蜗使用者和未发现听力损失的同龄人的频率和基频(F0)辨别力与音调流和语音流分离之间的关系。研究分别测量了 1,000 Hz 纯音和 110 Hz 复合音的频率和 F0 分辨力。使用前导/滞后延迟检测任务测量纯音和复合音的音流分离度。Spondee 单词识别是在具有高水平信息掩蔽的竞争语音中进行测量的,要求听者使用 F0 对语音进行分离。根据假设,频率和 F0 分辨能力将解释音调分离和语音接收结果中的很大一部分差异。平均而言,当竞争音流的频率或 F0 相对于目标音流发生偏移时,CI 用户在音调音流分离方面获得了很大的收益。线性关系占 CI 用户音流分离和复杂音调辨别测量之间协方差的 42%。相反,当竞争语流的 F0 相对于目标语流发生偏移时,则不存在这种益处。在音调流中观察到的巨大益处,如果能转移到歌曲中乐器的分离上,则对音乐聆听大有裨益;然而,在语音方面缺乏益处则表明,语音处理需要单独的机制或特殊的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信