Periodontal, occlusal, and aesthetic outcomes of missing maxillary lateral incisor replacement: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

International Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100957

Marco Migliorati, Arianna Zuffanti, Margherita Capuano, Luigi Canullo, Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio, Maria Menini

{"title":"Periodontal, occlusal, and aesthetic outcomes of missing maxillary lateral incisor replacement: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Marco Migliorati, Arianna Zuffanti, Margherita Capuano, Luigi Canullo, Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio, Maria Menini","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the best treatment alternatives for patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA) by comparing orthodontic space closure, implant and tooth supported dental prostheses by assessing studies that evaluated their periodontal, occlusal (function) and aesthetic results.Methods: The present systematic review was reported according to the indications of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) incorporating network meta-analysis, and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023487245). The PRISMA systematic search, without restriction on language or initial date, was carried out using electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and central register of controlled trials. To assess the aesthetic effects of the different treatment methods, an arm-based network meta-analysis was carried out.Results: The systematic search initially produced 1177 studies. At the end 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies used various methods of treatment for maxillary lateral incisor agenesis including orthodontic space closure, implant-supported and tooth-supported dental prostheses. Data were extracted from the articles selected, and a network meta-analysis was carried out.Conclusions: Within the limits of this network meta-analysis, no significant difference was found regarding the aesthetic results between orthodontic space closure or dental implant. Tooth-supported dental prostheses for MLIA reported worse scores in the periodontal indexes than orthodontic space closure treatment but the impact of orthodontic and prosthetic treatment on periodontal health remained contentious. Furthermore, no signs of TMJ dysfunction were observed in patients treated with either orthodontic space closure or prosthetic replacement.","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"23 1","pages":"100957"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the best treatment alternatives for patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA) by comparing orthodontic space closure, implant and tooth supported dental prostheses by assessing studies that evaluated their periodontal, occlusal (function) and aesthetic results.

Methods: The present systematic review was reported according to the indications of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) incorporating network meta-analysis, and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023487245). The PRISMA systematic search, without restriction on language or initial date, was carried out using electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and central register of controlled trials. To assess the aesthetic effects of the different treatment methods, an arm-based network meta-analysis was carried out.

Results: The systematic search initially produced 1177 studies. At the end 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies used various methods of treatment for maxillary lateral incisor agenesis including orthodontic space closure, implant-supported and tooth-supported dental prostheses. Data were extracted from the articles selected, and a network meta-analysis was carried out.

Conclusions: Within the limits of this network meta-analysis, no significant difference was found regarding the aesthetic results between orthodontic space closure or dental implant. Tooth-supported dental prostheses for MLIA reported worse scores in the periodontal indexes than orthodontic space closure treatment but the impact of orthodontic and prosthetic treatment on periodontal health remained contentious. Furthermore, no signs of TMJ dysfunction were observed in patients treated with either orthodontic space closure or prosthetic replacement.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

13.30%

发文量

审稿时长

26 days

期刊介绍： Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.