Individual Differences Underlying Preference for Processing Delay in Open-Fit Hearing Aids.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Borgný Súsonnudóttir, Borys Kowalewski, Georg Stiefenhofer, Tobias Neher
{"title":"Individual Differences Underlying Preference for Processing Delay in Open-Fit Hearing Aids.","authors":"Borgný Súsonnudóttir, Borys Kowalewski, Georg Stiefenhofer, Tobias Neher","doi":"10.1177/23312165241298613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In open-fit digital hearing aids (HAs), the processing delay influences comb-filter effects that arise from the interaction of the processed HA sound with the unprocessed direct sound. The current study investigated potential relations between preferred processing delay, spectral and temporal processing abilities, and self-reported listening habits. Ten listeners with normal hearing and 20 listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing impairments participated. Using a HA simulator, delay preference was assessed with a paired-comparison task, three types of stimuli, and five processing delays (0, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 ms). Spectral processing was assessed with a spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) task. Temporal processing was assessed with a gap detection task. Self-reported listening habits were assessed using a shortened version of the 'sound preference and hearing habits' questionnaire. A linear mixed-effects model showed a strong effect of processing delay on preference scores (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>η</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.30). Post-hoc comparisons revealed no differences between either the two shortest delays or the three longer delays (all <i>p</i> > .05) but a clear difference between the two sets of delays (<i>p</i> < .001). A multiple linear regression analysis showed SRD to be a significant predictor of delay preference (<i>p</i> < .01, <i>η</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.29), with good spectral processing abilities being associated with a preference for short processing delay. Overall, these results indicate that assessing spectral processing abilities can guide the prescription of open-fit HAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"28 ","pages":"23312165241298613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165241298613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In open-fit digital hearing aids (HAs), the processing delay influences comb-filter effects that arise from the interaction of the processed HA sound with the unprocessed direct sound. The current study investigated potential relations between preferred processing delay, spectral and temporal processing abilities, and self-reported listening habits. Ten listeners with normal hearing and 20 listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing impairments participated. Using a HA simulator, delay preference was assessed with a paired-comparison task, three types of stimuli, and five processing delays (0, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 ms). Spectral processing was assessed with a spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) task. Temporal processing was assessed with a gap detection task. Self-reported listening habits were assessed using a shortened version of the 'sound preference and hearing habits' questionnaire. A linear mixed-effects model showed a strong effect of processing delay on preference scores (p < .001, η2 = 0.30). Post-hoc comparisons revealed no differences between either the two shortest delays or the three longer delays (all p > .05) but a clear difference between the two sets of delays (p < .001). A multiple linear regression analysis showed SRD to be a significant predictor of delay preference (p < .01, η2 = 0.29), with good spectral processing abilities being associated with a preference for short processing delay. Overall, these results indicate that assessing spectral processing abilities can guide the prescription of open-fit HAs.

在开放式数字助听器(HA)中,处理延迟会影响梳状滤波器效应,梳状滤波器效应是由经过处理的助听器声音与未经处理的直达声相互作用产生的。本研究调查了首选处理延迟、频谱和时间处理能力以及自我报告的听力习惯之间的潜在关系。10 名听力正常的听众和 20 名轻度至中度感音神经性听力障碍的听众参加了此次研究。使用 HA 模拟器,通过配对比较任务、三种类型的刺激和五种处理延迟(0、0.5、2、5 和 10 毫秒)来评估延迟偏好。频谱处理通过频谱波纹辨别(SRD)任务进行评估。时间处理通过间隙检测任务进行评估。自我报告的听力习惯通过 "声音偏好和听力习惯 "问卷的简短版本进行评估。线性混合效应模型显示,处理延迟对偏好分数有很大影响(p η2 = 0.30)。事后比较显示,两个最短延迟或三个较长延迟之间没有差异(均 p > .05),但两组延迟之间有明显差异(p p η2 = 0.29),良好的频谱处理能力与偏好短处理延迟有关。总之,这些结果表明,对频谱处理能力的评估可以指导开放拟合 HAs 的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信