{"title":"Postoperative infection of the spine: management and outcomes at a single institution. A retrospective study.","authors":"Keyvan Mostofi, Kamran Shirbache, Gianluca Caragliano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is a potential complication of spine surgery and a significant cause of readmission and surgical revision. Furthermore, the presence of comorbidities, along with the rising frequency of spinal surgeries, may result in secondary infections, thereby elevating the risk of these infections and affecting overall health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the study authors' approach for preventing and managing postoperative infections in their center and identify the spine surgeries most susceptible to infection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective study of 2559 patients at a single clinical center who underwent various lumbar spine surgeries, including interlaminar device plus diskectomy, diskectomy, interlaminar device plus recalibration, unilateral recalibration, and bilateral recalibration, among others, between March 1, 2015, and March 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of these 2559 patients, 54 (2.11%) were readmitted due to infection and underwent reoperation. The most common isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus. Infection occurred in 1.9% of instrumentation surgeries and 2.3% of non-instrumentation surgeries; this difference was not statistically significant. Infected patients received empiric dual antibiotic therapy after sampling of the surgical site and before identification of the causative organisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate that comorbidities increase the risk of infection. However, the authors did not find that instrumentation in spinal surgery escalates this risk. Empiric dual antibiotic therapy was effective in managing SSI prior to identification of the microorganisms via culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"36 11","pages":"402-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a potential complication of spine surgery and a significant cause of readmission and surgical revision. Furthermore, the presence of comorbidities, along with the rising frequency of spinal surgeries, may result in secondary infections, thereby elevating the risk of these infections and affecting overall health.
Objective: To assess the study authors' approach for preventing and managing postoperative infections in their center and identify the spine surgeries most susceptible to infection.
Materials and methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study of 2559 patients at a single clinical center who underwent various lumbar spine surgeries, including interlaminar device plus diskectomy, diskectomy, interlaminar device plus recalibration, unilateral recalibration, and bilateral recalibration, among others, between March 1, 2015, and March 31, 2023.
Results: Of these 2559 patients, 54 (2.11%) were readmitted due to infection and underwent reoperation. The most common isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus. Infection occurred in 1.9% of instrumentation surgeries and 2.3% of non-instrumentation surgeries; this difference was not statistically significant. Infected patients received empiric dual antibiotic therapy after sampling of the surgical site and before identification of the causative organisms.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that comorbidities increase the risk of infection. However, the authors did not find that instrumentation in spinal surgery escalates this risk. Empiric dual antibiotic therapy was effective in managing SSI prior to identification of the microorganisms via culture.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.